All social media discourse basically boils down to, "Your moral argument is based on a gross oversimplification, but if I point this out, people will accuse me if defending the bad thing"
When you dress as sherlock and feel weird the whole day
spirk using telepathy to keep each other alive. kirk, desperate, psy-null and untrained, reaching clumsily into spock's dying mind and pulling, dragging spock's essence into himself, wrenching him forceably from the very jaws of death and holding him there through sheer strength of will, saying you can't die, i won't let you, you can't leave me, i need you, and binding him to life and to himself until it's impossible to fully separate them. spock, more skilled, carefully managing each one of kirk's vital signs - keeping his heart beating steady, his lungs drawing breath, his temperature within a safe range, all while suppressing kirk's pain, and at the same trying, vainly, to keep their minds from tying themselves inexorably together, but they're pressed too close and he can't, and he hopes that kirk will forgive him, for bonding them like this (he will, of course he will), but the alternative, letting kirk die, was - unthinkable.
I bought this organ off Etsy I like to jab it with my screwdriver.
yes we all know about medieval jesters waging psychological warfare in times of combat, but wait there’s more!
at the beginning of battles they would ride in on horseback, juggling swords or lances, and taunt & bait the opposition. soldiers would get so angry they would break rank & weaken formations just to try to kill the fool
STAR TREK: THE NEXT GENERATION (1987-1994) “All Good Things…” (7.25/7.26)
Reading like the monster The Monster at the End of This Book, thrilling.
Bed against zero walls: You're a freak
Bed against one wall: Acceptable, but you can do better
Bed against two walls: Perfect
Bed against three walls: Do you live in a closet?
Bed against four walls: How???
Bed against five walls: What? That makes no sense...
Bed against six walls: Stop...
Bed against seven walls: I said stop!
Bed against eight walls: What are you doing?! That's too many walls!
Bed against nine walls: We've gone too far, I don't think we're in normal reality anymore...
Bed against ten walls: Hello? Is anybody there? How are there walls all perpendicular to one another?
Bed against eleven walls: We're definitely not in normal reality anymore
Bed against twelve walls: I think we're the only ones here. Just me and the bed.
Bed against thirteen walls: It's weirdly... cozy over here.
Bed against fourteen walls: Could this have been what I wanted all along? Solitude?
Bed against sixteen walls: Wait, Did you see that? We skipped 15.
Bed against twenty walls: No, this is definitely too much. Somebody get me out of here!
Bed against twenty eight walls: The skips are getting bigger, the walls are closing in...
Bed against forty walls: They're suffocating me...
Bed against sixty walls: Help...
Bed against one hundred walls: ...help.
Bed against two hundred walls: ...
Bed against five hundred walls: . . .
Bed against one thousand walls: . . .
Bed against five thousand walls: . . .
Bed against twenty thousand walls:
Bed against one hundred thousand walls:
Bed against five hundred thousand walls:
Bed against one million walls:
Bed against one billion walls:
Bed against one trillion walls:
Bed against one quadrillion walls: . . .
Bed against one quintillion walls: . . .
Bed against one sextillion walls: . . .
Bed against one nonillion walls: ...good night.
I like when gods look like spirals and snakes and shit I like to think about the different types of gods like ones that are directly connected to humans are more human and the more creator, forces of nature, types are just fucked up little guys
"The transition from [the barter system to currency] is hard to understand; how can human cravings be fetishized into pieces of metal? The answer is elegant because it reveals not only the origin of money, but its character even today. Money was and still is literally sacred: 'It has long been known that the first markets were sacred markets, the first banks were temples, the first to issue money were priests or priest-kings.' The first coins were minted and distributed by temples because they were medallions inscribed with the image of their god and embodying his protective power. Containing such manna, they were naturally in demand, not because you could buy things with them but vice-versa: since they were popular, you could exchange them for other things.
The consequence of this was that 'now the cosmic powers could be the property of everyman, without even the need to visit temples: you could now traffic in immortality in the marketplace.' This eventually led to the emergence of a new kind of person, 'who based the value of his life — and so of his immortality — on a new cosmology centered on coins.' A new meaning system arose, which our present economic system makes increasingly the meaning-system. 'Money becomes the distilled value of all existence ... a single immortality symbol, a ready way of relating the increase of oneself to all the important objects and events of one's world.'
If we replace 'immortality' with 'becoming real,' the point becomes Buddhist: beyond its usefulness as a medium of exchange, money has become modern humanity's most popular way of accumulating Being, of coping with our gnawing intuition that [the ego does] not really exist. Suspecting that the sense of self is a groundless construction, we went to temples and churches to ground ourselves in God; now we ground ourselves financially.
The problem is that the true meaning of this meaning-system is unconscious, which means, as usual, that we end up paying a heavy price for it. The value we place on money karmically rebounds back against us: the more we value it, the more we use it to evaluate ourselves."
- David Loy, from "Buddhism and Money: The Repression of Emptiness Today." Buddhist Ethics and Modern Society: An International Symposium, edited by Charles Wei-hsun Fu and Sandra A. Wawrytko, 1991.