Well, shit. I didn’t think of it like that but now that you mention it...
Sex Education is one of the first shows where I don't ship the male bestfriends with each other and i think that's largely because the show developed its female characters just as strongly as it developed its male characters
u ever see someone with extremely fucked up views (or actions) and think wowww if a couple of things in my life went the tiniest bit differently that would have been me
star wars i have been through this song and dance before and i grow weary of it
Note: this is regarding the lore made up by tumblr collaboratively about a fake Martin Scorsese film. See the post that started it all and fake poster.
Goncharov was released in 1973. It was written by Matteo JWHJ 0715 and directed (?) and/or possibly co-written by Martin Scorsese. Scorsese’s big name helped popularize the film, but as a result JWHJ 0715’s significant contribution is often overlooked
Goncharov was forgotten and was actually difficult to acquire for many years. This may have been due to corporations hoarding rights and access, the actually mafia targeting distribution of the film, other factors, or a combination of these. This led to pirating of the film, which allegedly led to pirating discourse surrounding the film
There are talks of a Goncharov II or remake
Goncharov is a mafia boss in Naples of Russian origin. His wife/fiancée is named Katya, also of Russian origin. Goncharov may or may not have fled Russia, and may or may not have been pursued by someone trying to get him back to Russia, possibly to face legal justice. One such person trying to do this could be Valery Michailov
Valery Michailov in Katya’s sister. He may resent Goncharov due to his relationship with his sister and due to Goncharov being wanted by the Russian government. He is somewhat patriotic, possibly a former government worker or soldier.
Katya’s last name is either Michailova or Goncharova (although possibly with the wrong suffix). Her relationship with Goncharov is strained, tense, and possibly loveless. She ends up betraying him in the end. This is often seen as a subversion on the typical tropes for women in mafia movies.
At some point, Katya is on a bridge with Goncharov. At some point, Katya points a gun at Goncharov. At some point, Katya is injured on a boat/in a boathouse.
Katya is amicable with someone named Sofia, who has brown hair. She also has subtextual homoerotic tension with her
Sofia may be working class/poorer than many of the other characters are.
Goncharov has subtextual homoerotic tension with someone named Andrey. Andrey is Goncharov’s old friend/best friend/nemesis/enemy/competitor. There is at least one instance of one of them trying to kill the other.
Ice pick Joe is played by John Cazale, making this his 6th movie. He has a famous 10 minute scene with Katya, and at some point dies, also possibly at the hands of Katya.
Mario Ambrosini works with Goncharov, possibly as a lackey or number two. At some point in the middle of the story, he betrays Goncharov and Goncharov tells him that he “never wants to see [Mario] again”. It is unclear what happens to him after that. Mario also has a relationship with Andrey that some have described as “fascinating”. It is unclear how.
There is a clock motif in Goncharov, and a general theme regarding “running out of time” before death. There are a few characters who seem at the very least subconsciously aware of the fact that they have little time until their death. The film also deals with the theme of fate, of death and tragedy being and inevitable thing for these characters.
Goncharov dies at the end of the movie, due to someone’s betrayal.
Goncharov (1973) was heavily influenced by the American Cold War propaganda of the time. Some argue that it plays right into the stereotypes of Russians, others say it is a clever subversion of the propaganda and stereotypes of the time.
Feel free to add more/expand/add alternative information!
Did someone order a tall glass of haikyuu shitposting? No? You’re getting it anyways biTC H
So I’m seeing people in deep denial that louis mural is not a rainbow. So I’m here as the logical guidance you’ve all been looking for to help make less of a fool of yourselves.
So firstly no. No it’s not a rainbow. It’s actually a tv test pattern. Here’s the proof:
These are the colours of a test pattern:
Here are the colours on louis mural:
Oh would you look at that... the same.
Now here’s the colours in a rainbow:
Now lets look back at the mural:
Completely different.
A rainbow follows the Roy g biv pattern, there is no other order for a rainbow to exist. Rainbows in nature are Roy g biv and rainbows on pride flags are too. So people can stop saying “the mural is so loud” “I’m so proud of Louis” “they’re going to be free soon” because that’s not what it is. It’s not a signal, it’s not a sign, it’s a design that has to do with a broken tv, look it even has static to go with it. You can still be proud of Louis but be proud of his album, his music NOT his sexuality which this has NOTHING to do with.
Thank you for coming to me ted talk and make sure to stream walls on the 31st of January.
Bro Merlin is my comfort show & I’m in the midst of a rewatch and it’s LEAVING NETFLIX? God hates me Frl 😭
Okay so Apple Music has Louis comments on the album and some of the songs the commentary I’m so,,, ah. Like the:
“I can remember that feeling of being 18 and meeting the person you might spend the rest of your life with”