me, looking back on it all:
࣪ . ◌ 𓈒 ࿙࿚۪᤺࿙࿚۪᤺࿙࿚۪᤺ 📿 bios
pessoa de Deus (Luffy)
"nami você limpa sua casa ou paga alguém pra limpar? é pro meu tcc" nami respondeu: quando a casa fica suja eu compro outra
feminista até falarem mal de trafalgaf law
"eu uso o deboche pq violência ainda é crime" posted by zoro 1 seg
boa hancock postou: destruída? sim. desarrumada? jamais!
We don’t talk about this Starbucks feminism enough.
WATCH ALL OF THIS!!!!
Grim-> fica "possuído"
Yuu: SANGUE DE JESUS TEM PODERRR MAS TEM PODERRRRRRR
I know we are all like "people in caveman times would drill holes in their head to relieve headaches" andwe go oh that's so stupid that's so dumb but like. then I get a headache and I'm like.ooooh I get it I get it. Grug prepare the drill.
The New York Times, however, does have rules and norms. Schwartz had no prior reporting experience. Her reporting partner Gettleman explained the basics to her, Schwartz said in a podcast interview on January 3, produced by Israel’s Channel 12 and conducted in Hebrew.
Gettleman, she said, was concerned they “get at least two sources for every detail we put into the article, cross-check information. Do we have forensic evidence? Do we have visual evidence? Apart from telling our reader ‘this happened,’ what can we say? Can we tell what happened to whom?”
Schwartz said she was initially reluctant to take the assignment because she did not want to look at visual images of potential assaults and because she lacked the expertise to conduct such an investigation.
This is stunning.
The fear among Times staffers who have been critical of the paper’s Gaza coverage is that Schwartz will become a scapegoat for what is a much deeper failure. She may harbor animosity toward Palestinians, lack the experience with investigative journalism, and feel conflicting pressures between being a supporter of Israel’s war effort and a Times reporter, but Schwartz did not commission herself and her nephew to report one of the most consequential stories of the war. Senior leadership at the New York Times did.
Schwartz said as much in an interview with Israeli Army Radio on December 31. “The New York Times said, ‘Let’s do an investigation into sexual violence’ — it was more a case of them having to convince me,” she said. Her host cut her off: “It was a proposal of The New York Times, the entire thing?”
“Unequivocally. Unequivocally. Obviously. Of course,” she said. “The paper stood behind us 200 percent and gave us the time, the investment, the resources to go in-depth with this investigation as much as needed.”
The whole piece is quite long, please go read it yourself, it's quite definitive.
we’re really out here living in an AI dystopian hellscape and this shit has just begun… the future is grim…