Glory In Bloodshed

Gyaru nails 🌸ᕙ(˵◕ω◕˵✿)つ

this really happened guys, the courtroom artist sent it to me, he said the whole court went wild too got the idea from @genomynt, here's the post!

hydrangea armor by hallofstars

maybe it's cuz i'm crazy, but isn't it weird that the ppl who say "trans men/mascs want to be men but not be treated as men" see "treating someone as a man" in the exact same way misogynists treat women?

like, in their opinions trans men/mascs should be:

seen but not heard

support others while not expecting anything in return

be ok with being marginalized in our own spaces

not talk about our issues, especially mental health and reproductive health

live in a very strict standard of beauty

not be too masculine

don't overshadow anyone ever

have our accomplishments and historical figures be dismissed and forgotten

not communicate our trauma or discomfort

not set boundaries

not talk about the realities of our lives and bodies

like, i'm sure i've heard all this before

Ngl I think I could get on board with Dragodile if most of the content wasn’t weird sexist and transphobic genderbend stuff

terminally online schizo rant incoming. “puriteen” is just what Epic Bacon Faillennials call little girls who are negatively responding to or critiquing the hegemonic culture of sex. as someone in this age group, i rebuke this part of my culture. the “sex positivity” mindset has simply entrenched male supremacy, rape culture, and the sexual subordination of women, because it flattens, obfuscates, and ignores how exploitation and abuse occurs. younger women and girls are contending with the fact that the predominant model of “consent” and “choice” are insufficient tools to assess sexual violence, and these concepts have been used to endorse said violence. liberal feminism has done nothing but condition women and girls into complying with male supremacy by eroticizing both women’s oppression and male power, and more and more people are unraveling this to the chagrin of the Epic Bacon demographic that pioneered this toothless ideology. “ruthless criticism of all that exists, ruthless both in the sense of not being afraid of the results it arrives at and in the sense of being just as little afraid of conflict with the powers that be”—leftists happily apply this marxist concept to everything except what makes them orgasm. curious and revealing, indeed.

thus, the “puriteens” insult is an attempt to shame girls back into compliance, to be silent about the terms by which men have sexual access to women, a grim reality they see play out on a daily basis both online and off. both the left and the right agree that patriarchy is compatible with the world they want to build or maintain, and as a result, the feminist insistence on the abolition of patriarchy is the most radical, most revolutionary demand on earth. women’s allies and enemies want them to remain in chains. hell, many women want to be in chains. unfortunately, your friends lied to you when they said patriarchy is right wing. it transcends the political compass as no one can imagine a world without it. leftists only oppose capitalism and wage labor and slavery and racism and queerphobia and imperialism and ableism and war and the prison industrial complex because these systems of exploitation victimize men. men are humans, women are not, so they find misogyny permissible. things are much worse than you think, milady.

and as a result of all this, leftists are not beyond calling women and girls sexually dysfunctional, crazy, or not sufficiently fucked enough for opposing their own sexual subordination. something is wrong with you if you can identify, even through millions of layers of progressive-sounding obfuscation and gaslighting, women’s sexual subordination. men who complain about having less sexual access to women are coddled, catered to, thought to be victims of a “loneliness epidemic” that can only be solved by women’s submission or else they can’t help but engage in femicide, while the women who oppose said submission are called “puritans,” prudes, hysterical, underfucked, fascists and insane. i can’t count the number of times i’ve said that actual puritans were not even anti-sex—they supported men’s sexual dominance over women. the insult is ahistorical, but its function is to cast feminist critique of sex as wrong by likening it to being right wing. the right obviously isn’t anti-sex either, nor do they take kindly to feminism. all of that is to say, “puriteen” is primarily a misogynistic silencing tactic.

under the strict regime of heterosexuality, women and girls will be cast as mentally ill if they have class consciousness. having class consciousness as a woman renders you the ultimate enemy that must be neutralized, because we can’t have women opposing their duty as property. if women became human beings, that would just upend the earth, destroying the foundations of society, which is exactly what I and my brand of girlypops desire. girls who are called “puriteens” may make analytical errors, as we all do, but they are met with so much hostility because they actually do attempt to criticize all that exists, including the sexual cultural that is objectively organized through male supremacy, and they do attempt to commit the one transgression that eclipses all other transgressions—believing that women are human. to that i say, godspeed, puriteens, become even woker, shake the table, do not be silenced by these geriatric gooners and their 50 gigabytes of furry inflation porn. critical support to all puriteens of the world.

a woman will see a game about raping women and be like "wow, its absolutely disgusting that someone made a game about raping women, i dont think a game platform should be selling a game about raping women" and people online will scream at her and call her a pro-censorship puritan fascist

a fated pair of star-crossed bunnies 🩷🐇