The Argument

1k notes!?? Is this a ‘welcome back’ ?

they were surprised he finally put moderate effort into something

Happy Birthday, Ink!!!

Small animation for my boy, Ink. Inspired by one of the @comyet illustrations. I hope you like it ❤️

Ink!Sans belongs to @myebi / @comyet

hes so silly

Ink!sans belongs to @comyet

Its the kids turn!! ⸜(˃ ᵕ ˂ )⸝

i put way too much effort in this

Don't worry they're still FAR from the conventional nuclear family lmao

PJ is by @/7goodangel

Gradient is by @/askcomboclub

Template by @/unu-nunu-art

Error and Fresh by @/loverofpiggies

Ink by @/comyet

Design notes under!

Design Notes for PJ:

-Error patches up the tears on his scarf! Very nice of him to do.

-All the art materials he has stashed on his belt are for food. He likes to snack on em often.

-Because of Error's..."tolerance" of him, he has more strings that he can use. He's got enough to form legs.

-Fresh gifts him magical ink durable Heely shoes! Instead of shedding footprints all over the place, he can instead heely/skate around and leave behind lines. He's creative on using it during battles. He would never admit it, but he appreciates the gift.

Design Notes for Gradient:

-I based his outfit off ye old web aesthetics like Cyber Grunge,,, I really liked the big pants look on him.

-I placed his scarf on his neck to match with his family, but also to match Template's scarf hehe, a little sign of his influence.

-You can't see it but his laptop bag has a ton of pins and merch of random dated internet references.

-His shoes looking old design Ink's shoes were complete accident but I liked it enough to keep anyway. Maybe Ink gave it to him and he spiced it up!

your color

textless in reblogs

ink - comyet / mye bi

error - thecrayonqueen / loverofpiggies

skeletons sure do like the bits in this fandom

I did it.. Yay.. _(:,3 」∠)_

Geno Sans belongs to CrayonQueen

Reaper Sans belongs to Ren

※FELLSWAP COMIC SETTING※ We will keep consummating the whole story step by step.

Link to the CATALOG

I greatly apologize if you've been asked about this topic before, but I would like to say that I still believe in Ink despite what happened in Underverse. My personal theory is that he was just lonely, and didn't know what else to do but try to bring his old friend back. My point is, no matter how many people say he doesn't deserve the love and attention he gets, Ink will always be the quirky little cinnamon roll I've come to know and love in my eyes! I wish you and Ink a great day today!

Thank you so much love! This is so nice of you to take the time to write this! <3 This addresses something that bothers me in fandoms: some people are very binary in appreciating characters. They tend to like characters and justify their liking by the fact that the characters have good morals and qualities, and that their flaws can relatively passed off as cute. So when a character appears as flawed and deceiving, they don’t want to be affiliated with this image of a character as something they like. Which is the whole problem.

Ink can be terribly selfish and disconnected. He can be calculating and distant. But he can also be very helpful, motivational and happy-go-lucky. He has the choice to be whatever he wants. This is what makes him feel off, yet at the same time, it can make him very endearing. He deals with emotions in a very unusual way: he’s not just a devil in disguise. (Well I mean people who only look at Underverse will never hear me out about this but that’s fine lmao)What I mean is, people tend to reject flawed characters. I think he should get love and attention because he’s flawed and complex, not because he looks like a pure angel with flaws that can be quieted down. Believing that characters without any fault are the only characters you’re entitled to appreciate because otherwise it’d feel “wrong” is very sad. I ADORE writing characters dealing with their flaws because it inspires me to do the same. Shutting this process down, even though it’s just on “harmless fictional characters”, prevents you from seeing character writing in a very very wide and resourceful perspective.