If I’m Being I Don’t Feel The Ship Of Jasper And Spinel But I Like That Jasper Is Like “Oh You

Writing Notes: Metafiction

Metafiction - a self-conscious literary style in which the narrator or characters are aware that they are part of a work of fiction.

Often most closely associated with postmodern prose, it involves a departure from standard narrative conventions, in which a self-aware narrator infuses their perspective into the text to create a fictional work that comments on fiction.

This kind of fictional writing can appear in novels, short stories, plays, video games, film, and television.

Characteristics of Metafiction

Breaking the fourth wall: Breaking this boundary between writer and reader blurs the lines between real life and fiction. Metafiction often directly addresses the reader, openly questioning the narrator’s own story.

Self-reflexive: Authors use self-reflexivity, or self-consciousness, to reflect on their own artistic processes, drawing the audience’s attention away from the story and allowing them to question the content of the text itself.

Experimental: Metafiction is often experimental in nature, fusing a number of different techniques together to create an unconventional narrative. Metafiction can also experiment with the role of the narrator and their relationship to the fictional characters in the story.

The main purpose of metafiction is to highlight the dichotomy between the real world and the fictional world of a novel.

Metafiction can be used to parody literary genre conventions, subvert expectations, reveal truths, or offer a view of the human condition.

Often used in postmodernist fiction to comment on the world that our character inhabits, metafiction helps give a work of text more significance by providing an outward, exploratory look of a self-contained world.

Examples of Metafiction in Literature

The Canterbury Tales (1387): Geoffrey Chaucer’s classic anthology of interconnected stories that parody the conventional elements of fiction. Chaucer blends linguistic styles and rhetorical devices to craft a collection of stories within the overall story, regularly breaking the fourth wall to address the audience directly and apologize for any offense the narrative may cause.

Don Quixote (1605): Miguel de Cervantes Don Quixote is essentially a book about books. In the prologue, Cervantes breaks the fourth wall by commenting on his process of writing the book, in which he urges the reader to make up their own mind about the written text. The ensuing novel discusses the adventures of the protagonist, Don Quixote, who has gone mad from reading too many chivalric romance stories.

Giles Goat-Boy (1966): John Barth’s fourth novel is a prime example of the metafiction characteristic of postmodernism, featuring several fictional disclaimers in the beginning and end, arguing that the book was not written by the author and was instead given to the author on a tape or written by a computer.

The French Lieutenant's Woman (1969): Written by John Fowles, The French Lieutenant’s Woman is a historiographic metafiction novel about a love story between a gentleman and a governess in the Victorian era. The book features a narrator who becomes part of the story and offers several different ways to end the story.

Slaughterhouse Five (1969): In Slaughterhouse Five, Kurt Vonnegut includes his own voice as a character in this non-linear narrative. The main character has been “unstuck in time,” oscillating between the present and the past with no control over his movement, emphasizing the senseless nature of war.

Gravity’s Rainbow (1973): This story by Thomas Pynchon is the poster child of postmodern literature, using a complex, fragmented structure to cover various subjects such as culture, science, social science, profanity, and literary propriety. In this particular narrative, Pynchon questions history and how it gets created, and also how it affects both society and the individual.

Source ⚜ More: References ⚜ Writing Resources PDFs

You're my angel! 🪽 sticker sheet

idol worship

didn't in make it in time for tsubomi day, so mezato day it is!

bnha/mha, my criticisms.

the order in which i put them does not imply I think some of these issues are worse or not as bad as others, it's just the order I think of them in.

1- bakugou katsuki. a bully who doesn't change, but gets worse. from suicide baiting, to attempted murder, and is consistently forgiven and encouraged by every character in the entire story and the fandom.

2- the sexism in the story and fandom. (I went on a whole rant about this but I don't want to write too much about it because it enrages me)

3- fanservice. and the fact that when a male character is used for fanservice it empowers them (male characters uniforms being broken, exposing muscular chests, while female character's exposure does not flaunt their strength, just beauty and sex appeal, even teenagers.)

4- THE FACT THAT THE ONLY TRANS CHARACTERS ARE EITHER A VILLAIN WHO DIED OR A SIDE CHARACTER.

5- character annihilation for the sake of the plot. fuck the plot. characters matter more.

6- eraserhead's shitty teaching and how the fandom sees him as a good teacher or even a father figure.

7- quirkless discrimination and how unadressed it was and how izuku just got over it after a bit in high school even with his lifelong abuser there.

8- 1-A abandonning izuku and before that forcing him to come with them to UA, endangering those sheltering there.

9- Eri being rescued from those who used her only to be used in a different way but it's fine because using a child for her quirk is moral if the heroes do it. 10- bad representation of teenagers and children.

11- HORRIBLE representation of people of colour. mirko is an angry and violent character who is blunt in her words. Rock Lock is also an angry character, and any very reasonable suggestions and remarks he has are ignored. it is a very common trope to have black characters always be angry, and while yes they can be, it speaks a lot about the writer that your only black characters fit the stereotype.

11- idolisation of america.

12- endeavours "redemption"

13- lack of quirkless characters (what happened to 20% of the population?)

14- mineta's entire existence

15- shit pacing

16- shit plot

17- shit characters

The best part of the London Special was when Ladybug said "Its London time!" and spent 99% of the special being anywhere but London.

Happy Holidays 🎁🎄🎁

قائمةالحملات الموثقة والمعتمدة

هام: غزة – لأصحاب الحملات الموثقة والموجودين في قائمة انتظار التوثيق

هذا المنشور يتناول النقاط التالية:

1. طلبات التوثيق الجديدة: الآلية المتبعة للتوثيق السريع.

لضمان السرعة والسهولة في إضافة الحملات إلى قوائمنا، مع الحفاظ على المصداقية في التحقق، سنعتمد أسلوبًا جديدًا في التوثيق، كالآتي:

كيفية تقديم الطلب:

يُرجى إرسال رسالة لحسابنا في @gazavetters تتضمن التفاصيل التالية:

✓ اسم صاحب الحملة (باللغة الإنجليزية)

✓ رقم الجوال أو الهوية الوطنية

✓ رابط الحملة

✓ جديد: صورة حديثة تجمع الأشخاص المذكورين في تفاصيل الحملة (لا يشترط ظهور جميع الأفراد، لكن يُفضل أن تكون الصورة تمثل نصف الأشخاص المذكورين في الحملة على الأقل). يجب أن تكون الصورة في مكان معلوم مثل خيمتك، منزلك، أو أي مكان له علاقة بتفاصيل الحملة. كما يُشترط وجود ورقة مكتوب عليها gazavetters وتاريخ اليوم.

ملاحظة مهمة : الاشخاص الي يرسلون صور مرة بدون ورقة ومرة ورقة لحالها .. يقراء هالشىء ١٠مرات

صورة حديثة للاشخاص المذكورين بالقصة في الخيمة او بيت او اية مكان يوحي ويثبت انك في غزة مع ورقة مكتوب عليها تاريخ اليوم واسم gazavetters في نفس الصورة والصورة بالاسفل اشبه للكلام الي مش مفهوم للبعض

ملاحظة مهمة:

يُرجى إرسال جميع البيانات المذكورة أعلاه متتالية في رسالة واحدة. سنعمل بسرعة كبيرة على توثيق الحملات المرسلة إلينا والموجودة في قوائم الانتظار.

2. القواعد والقوانين وضوابط الاستخدام السليم للتطبيق: لتجنب الإضرار بالآخرين أو الإساءة لأي شخص، وما يترتب على المخالفين من عقوبات. (على الأقل للقائمة الخاصة بنا، وسنسعى لتطبيقها أيضًا على القوائم الموثوقة الأخرى بالتنسيق مع أصدقائنا المسؤولين عنها).

وذلك لحماية الحملات وضمان احترام الآخرين وعدم الإضرار بالمجتمع الداعم، نُؤكد على الالتزام بالقواعد التالية:

1. عدم التعليق بطلب المساعدة في منشورات الآخرين:

لا يجوز استخدام منشورات الآخرين، سواء المتعلقة بفلسطين أو بموضوعات أخرى، لنشر تعليقات استغاثة أو طلب مساعدة. هذا السلوك يضر بالجميع، وقد يؤدي إلى حظر أصحاب الحملات أو إغلاق التعليقات على المنشورات، مما يسيء إلى صورة الحملات الفلسطينية عامة.

2. عدم ابتزاز المدونات الداعمة وغير الداعمة:

تلقينا شكاوى من مدونات أجنبية حول محاولات ابتزاز وشتم. أي شخص يثبت قيامه بذلك سيُعاقب بتدابير صارمة لضمان عدم تكرار هذه السلوكيات.

3. الامتناع عن الإشارة (منشن) إلى المدونات المُغلقة للتواصل:

عند الحاجة، يُمكنك ذكر المدونات في منشوراتك فقط وبطريقة محترمة، دون إحراج أو تهديد.

4. عدم نشر منشورات تهديد أو اتهام للمدونات:

لا يحق لك اتهام أو تهديد أي مدونة لم تستجب لطلبك.

عقوبات المخالفين:

في حال مخالفة القواعد، سيتم وضع ملاحظات بجانب اسم الحملة في القوائم، مثل:

"احذر التعامل مع هذه الحملة بسبب سوابق ابتزاز الناشرين".

"احذر التعامل مع هذه الحملة بسبب سوابق إزعاج الناشرين المتكرر".

"احذر التعامل مع هذه الحملة بسبب سوابق نشر استغاثته على منشورات الآخرين".

"احذر التعامل مع هذه الحملة بسبب سوابق تهديد الأشخاص".

ستُكتب هذه الملاحظات باللون الأحمر وبوضوح.

ملاحظة ختامية:

الالتزام بهذه القواعد يُساهم في تقديم صورة محترمة ومشرّفة عن فلسطين وغزة. كن داعمًا بطريقة تليق بحاجتك للمساعدة دون الإضرار بسمعتك أو سمعة بلدك.

list of vetted & approved campaign

Important: Gaza – For Verified Campaign Owners and Those on the Verification Waiting List

This post addresses the following points:

1. New Verification Requests: Streamlined Verification Process

To ensure speed and ease in adding campaigns to our lists while maintaining credibility, we are introducing a new verification method as follows:

How to Submit Your Request:

Please send a message to our account on "gazavetters" containing the following details:

✓ The campaign owner's name (in English).

✓ Phone number or national ID.

✓ Campaign link.

✓ New Requirement: A recent photo showing the individuals mentioned in the campaign details. (It is not necessary to include all individuals, but the photo should represent at least half of the people mentioned.) The photo should be taken in a recognizable location, such as your tent, home, or any place related to the campaign details. Additionally, a piece of paper with "GazaVetters" and today's date written on it must be visible in the photo.

Important Note:

Please send all the above-mentioned details in one message. We will expedite the verification process for campaigns submitted to us, especially those on the waiting list.

2. Rules, Regulations, and Proper Use of the Platform

To avoid harm or offense to others and to ensure fairness, the following rules must be adhered to. Violators may face penalties within our list, and we will coordinate with trusted lists to extend enforcement:

1. No Commenting to Seek Assistance on Others' Posts:

It is prohibited to use others’ posts, whether about Palestine or other topics, to comment with pleas or requests for help. This behavior harms everyone and could result in campaign owners being banned or comment sections being closed, tarnishing the reputation of Palestinian campaigns in general.

2. No Harassment or Blackmailing of Supporting or Non-Supporting Accounts:

We have received complaints from foreign accounts about attempts at blackmail or insults. Anyone found guilty of such behavior will face strict penalties to prevent recurrence.

3. Do Not Tag (Mention) Closed Accounts to Communicate:

If necessary, you may mention accounts respectfully in your posts without embarrassment or threats.

4. Do Not Post Threatening or Accusatory Content About Accounts:

You are not allowed to accuse or threaten any account that has not responded to your request.

Penalties for Violations:

If any of these rules are violated, notes will be added beside the campaign's name in the lists, such as:

"Avoid this campaign due to prior incidents of blackmailing publishers."

"Avoid this campaign due to repeated nuisance to publishers."

"Avoid this campaign due to prior incidents of seeking help in others' posts."

"Avoid this campaign due to previous threats to individuals."

These notes will be written in red and clearly displayed.

Final Note:

Adherence to these rules contributes to presenting a respectful and honorable image of Palestine and Gaza. Support in a manner that reflects your need for assistance without tarnishing your reputation or that of your country.

proship adults need to be searched

like i cant. i expect this from a teenager but a damn near grown adult… this is weird justification. if ur using two creeps to JUSTIFY ur interests, find a new interest 😭 holy shit.

like even if ur a pro shipper this is weird. someone give this woman medical attention like now

Bakugou stans who hate Endeavor and Endeavor stans who hate Bakugou make me laugh.

Because when you get down to it, they both benefit from the same things: in-universe privilege, narrative advantages, and plot manipulation. Their arcs enable each other in a way, they're both abusers being given more exposure and grace than their victims. They're both constantly being propped and accepted by the other characters despite being horrible people.

Criticizing one and not the other is obtuse. They're cut from the same exact cloth, the issues with their characters are nearly identical. And the focus of both their characters contribute to the overarching problem of MHA; not only pandering to abusers but pandering to those born privileged and who knowingly abused that privilege. And neither had to face actual repercussions without being protected by the author.

The only difference between them is in the literal sense; Endeavor is a worse person morally while Bakugou is a worse character narratively.

They both still suck ass

Iida and Tokoyami are so funny because you know neither one of them can stand Bakugou's ass but Iida will hold his tongue for Izuku's sake and Tokoyami will openly insult Bakugou for Izuku's sake