ENTJ: busy bonding with fellow viewer(s)
INTJ: *I knew it [3000x]*
ENTP: distracted by popcorn, occasional impromptu voice-over
INTP: *figures out the entire cast on their second screen*
I recently took the La Haye’s Temperament Analysis Test. I got “Phlegmatic-Melancholic”. I’d say it’s pretty accurate.
The bible is incredibly edited. If it fits together, which is heavily does not, it's because someone arranged it to be that way. Books that didn't match up were discarded. It's nothing more than a collection of short stories, cultivated in a vain attempt to convince generations of people to pass judgement on others. There's not a shred of evidence a word of it is anything more than personal delusion. Believing is just buying into that delusion.
Actually, the Bible is the most authenticated ancient text known to man. What does that mean? A lot of things actually…
The Bible has the smallest time gap between the time it was first written and the earliest manuscripts we have. That is VERY important when we are dealing with ancient documents because it greatly increases probability of reliability. We are going to take a few moments to compare the New Testament to other ancient historical accounts that are considered trustworthy and reliable. I usually just link to this whole video but I felt like throwing in pictures this time because I’m Extra like that
By historical comparison, the earliest manuscripts we have of the New Testament were written in a shockingly short time span from when the original document was penned - a mere 50 years. But there is so much more…
Every single manuscript out of the 24,633 we have of the New Testament alone matches up virtually perfectly, which means they were copied, not edited. They were not perpetuated like a game of telephone, they are true to their original content. How does that compare to the works of other ancient text? Look how many we have of Caesar, Plato, and Tacitus in comparison to the New Testament:
The next closest in regards to the number of manuscripts we have would be Homer’s Iliad with a total of 643 manuscripts
That still leaves the Bible leading by 23,990 manuscripts.
The foundational points of Caesar’s life, the preservation of the Iliad, and the reliability of Tacitus’ writings are considered rock solid. We believe those events happened, we believe the stories told are ones the authors wrote. So why do we doubt the Bible which is FAR more trustworthy than anything else we have? 643 x 38.31 to be exact.
So internally it’s accurate, but what about externally? How do we know it is not simply the writers perpetuating a lie? Glad you asked! Next slide…
Apart from the Bible, we have 9 non-Christian outside sources and 33 Christian outside sources. That brings us to a total of 42 outside sources affirming the events and authenticity of the Bible. Compare that to the second place who would be Caesar of which we only have ten outside sources documenting his life.
We don’t doubt the events of Caesar’s life, we don’t say that there is no evidence to prove the words about him are true, we don’t claim that these other books are so heavily edited that we can no longer believe anything they say is accurate. So why do we doubt the Bible is true?
The Bible blows everything else away. It passes every test of authenticity by a massive amount. If we disregard the validity of the Bible, we have to discard everything we claim to know about ancient history because the Bible is the absolute highest standard for historical accuracy. That’s a fact. (You can watch the whole video including why the four eye-witness gospel accounts are important here)
What INTJs do with ENFPs
I found this in an MBTI group on Facebook btw
INTJ (Me) : Hey, dude. When is our meeting time again?
INFP (Bestfriend) : IT STARTS WITH ...
INTJ and INFP: ... ONE THING! I DONT KNOW WHY!
INTJ: ...
INFP: ...
INTJ: ... But no, seriously...
This made me realize that hawkmoth should just have at least one day without akumatizing people. Just take a break from villany.
for @perditaalottachocolate-blog
What happens if you just go with the flow? No planning.
Most of the time, I only go with the flow when a competent leader is present. And I assist/ mentor him/her whenever I can. But there are times that I go with the flow and I just mentally criticize almost everything an incompetent leader does. And if I am dissatisfied of his leadership, I take control or I just leave and do my own thing.But upon back reading my answer. It kinda sounds as if, I'm still planning ahead, huh?I guess, if I had to shut off my "planning module" I guess I'd just end up day dreaming or just looking at the flowers/clouds. Thinking about my friends and family. Or I'd just go to sleep.
Gabriel: ...And I don't want to see you talking to anyone of my fucking family, ever again!
Jesse: hehe. Dad said the F word.
Genji: hehe. Family.
Praise be to God for this masterpiece. A painting only you can create.
wait for it, i promise it’s worth it
I love the idea of having an ENFP gf/future waifu. But somehow Im not physically attracted to the ENFPs around me. Maybe I'm just being too stupid.
MBTI Types: Summary
just another INTJ. Open to interviews and questions. If I can't understand the question I wont answer it. sorry in advance.
147 posts