That problem being, there is a history of their depiction of sapphic relationships being toxic, abusive and deadly. And I wouldn’t have as much of an issue with it, if it was a once or twice kind of thing… but this is a pattern.
I wasn't planning on releasing this meta piece, but I got into a really salty space this morning and here we are.
I will publicly share it in a few weeks, but if you enjoy my work and would like access sooner, you may consider becoming a patron!
Check it out here
furry archives (heights not to scale)
the way people are inclined to believe jonah magnus who doesn’t believe in fate/bloodlines and who longed to become an immaterial extension of a fear ‘deity’ is more likely to be tory-aligned than og!elias who was raised to believe he is better and more deserving simply because he is a bouchard is honestly. very strange
apologist? not necessarily. explainer? perhaps. understander? intimately. enjoyer? greatly. sexualizer? frequently,
When i say words of affirmation is my love language what i mean is "You are a living chronicle of terror.You are prepared. You are ready. You are marked. The power of the Ceaseless Watcher flows through you, and the time of our victory is here."
Ooooooo elias bouchard you are so annoying to me.
love how s1-2 jon was just like ‘oh i’ll have a word with elias about this’
messing around with jonah’s design
bad internet take and awful character analysis arent real they cant hurt me
they/them/any | 20 | jonah magnus’ correspondent, casual dragon age enjoyer | eng/ukr
190 posts