Some of y’all act like labels are some holy thing defined by god and that they can never change definitions or have flexible meanings.
there is this fascinating thing that comes out in some branches of tma discourse that reveals a kind of fucky mindset that a lot of people have, and it's the idea that if an action is justified then all of its negative outcomes can be written off as negligible, or the vice versa, that if something had negative outcomes then it couldn't have been justified. I see this a lot in georgie discourse, where people can't seem to hold at once in their heads that it is completely within a person's rights to cut off a friend for the sake of their own safety and it can (and most likely will) really suck for that friend and make them feel done wrong by and abandoned while leaving them worse off with less support. the core weirdness of that awful melanie take was the idea that she didn't have the right to be traumatized or feel upset at jon for the bullet surgery because there was no other way, which is a take so antithetical to everything tma tries to express and to, like, the everyday realities of real life that it genuinely boggles my mind. really How do you end up thinking like that. I want to know.
aroace spec jonelias... save me...
aroace spec jonelias
save me aroace spec jonelias
every time someone calls jude a terf or elias a tory a fairy dies somewhere
Keep reading
It's a unique type of frustration when you agree that a character is deeply flawed but other people keep missing what's actually wrong with them and assigning them new flaws that they don't even have it's like free my man he did none of that. He did a bunch of other shit tho.
I'm not scared anymore
Elias please this deeply traumatized him
my work for ukrainian dragon age artzine (@/lunavisua on twitter)
i love merrill character very much and was very glad to draw her!
they/them/any | 20 | jonah magnus’ correspondent, casual dragon age enjoyer | eng/ukr
190 posts