Yeah I Noticed It Too...

No one wants to believe dear.

But New Year is already here.

So listen closely to my word. I don't want you to be hurt.

I hope you'll be healthy, satisfied and full of cheer in this whole New Year. 😉

To @therealjacksepticeye @gabsmolders and their communities.

😂😂😂😂😂

Anti soon. Inspired post: x

Anti is missing his gauges, Dark is missing his tie… And this post by Jack makes me suspicious that that’s important. 

What if that wasn’t Anti and Dark? Jack said Anti and Dark couldn’t meet. What if that’s still true? And Mark set up Dark as a legitimately dangerous, creepy manipulator. A video like this seems slightly out of character, even if he did remain serious during it.

What if that video was what it was? It was Mark’s 18 million sub video, his big collab with other youtubers, some fun times! Jokes all around, poke fun at the audience, at the concept of dark youtubers, of Dark and Anti. They didn’t have their proper costumes because they’re mocking them. 

So, then. What happens when the real Anti and Dark show up? Gauges and tie and all, both furious that they were made a mockery of?

So I've been thinking

We all know how in the Bio Inc. video, Dr. Schneeplestein says “I need your HELP! SAVE him, SAVE jacks-ANTI”

This has been confusing a lot of people, but one thing Sean did really stood out to me.

When going through art in his fanart video, he fluidly said Jack when he was talking about Anti and went on like nothing was wrong.

What if this whole time, we’ve been trying to save the wrong person? What if the real one that needs help…is Anti?

@fear-is-nameless @schneeplestein-protection-squad @chase-brody-protection-squad @anti-support-group What are your thoughts on this?

@therealjacksepticeye

It’s the adorable @therealjacksepticeye and cute @wiishu

with the wittle itty bitty septic sam!

#Saveyourinternet

The European Commission and the European Parliament really disappointed me and I'm sure that I'm not alone. Because they are saying that they are trying to protect smaller authors and creators in the Europe, but in fact their current version of the article 13 could destroy thousands of them. Yes, I know the article 13 should protect film studios, musicians, writers and others artists from the illegal distribution of their works. So for an example there shouldn't be web sides where is a possibility to download movies, songs, books or another artistic works for free, because that's illegal. There should be only web sides, which have a contract with the company or directly an artist who own mentioned product and I agree with this. But what about our youtubers a lot of them could be destroyed and why? Just because of the current version of the article 13 doesn't think about exceptions. Thousands of people across the Europe could lose their jobs, because of this. The article 13 says that people can't work with things, which they didn't create. But what about "let's players", because they didn't create games, which they are playing. But when we think about that they aren't doing anything wrong or illegal, because they bought games or got them from developers. When we're watching "Let's plays or gaming video" from "gamer" we can hear him/her to talk about the game quality. In fact by playing and talking about games they make an advertising to the developers and gaming industry. So I think that there should be a better definition for them. Another category are reaction videos or reviews, because there could be some troubles too so there are another missing definitions. The same problem is with tutorials, educational videos or various types of compilations, because there we need some definitions as well. And finaly special categories like parodies, covers or karaoke which should have some special rules. Right now the Article 13 is so poorly defined that it's in conflict with freedom of an expression and human rights. So I hope that together with EU we will find a solution that will be good for everyone.

What if we're being played...?

@therealjacksepticeye Okay, so I know that the whole Anti thing is cooled down for now (i think??) but just hear me out for a sec.

I have a feeling Anti is playing us. He has been all this time.

I’ve noticed a lot of posts exclaiming that we should be trying to save Anti. That he’s misunderstood and needs love. And while I’m CERTAINLY NOT opposed to these theories…what if that’s exactly what he wants? What if it’s part of an elaborate scheme to get us on his side? His thing is to want to be in control. And, in a way, he kind of is. I mean, the whole community goes batshit nuts at any mention of him. We’re always theorizing (which is, ironically, what I’m doing now) and finding hints. We make fanart and fanfiction and edits. We give him attention. But one thing we do seem to be adamant about as a community is saving, specifically the egos.

So, what if Anti is using that trait we possess as a community to his advantage, and is trying to trick us into saving him and turning against you and the egos, thus turning us completely into his puppets? He already seems to have us at the tip of his finger. He knows we want to help but we don’t know how (“If you want him back so badly, then why don’t YOU save him?!”). Using this confusion, maybe he’ll try to trick us to save the wrong guy, and then when we realize our fatal error, it will be too late, and he can sit and laugh and claim we let it happen while we mourn, defeated and disheartened.

What if Anti isn’t as chaotic and impulsive as we see him? What if there really is a method to his madness? Maybe he has everything all carefully planned out, and is preparing for phase two?

Something feels too fishy about his sudden disappearance, and I plan on finding out what.

@therealjacksepticeye Happy birthday to our silent boy JJ. 😉

Y̠̖҉̶͞O̴̧͚̪̫͟͞U͖̱̗̳ ̵̨̳̖̀Ś͘T̩O̵̝̲̳͏P͖̭̤̱͜P̨͇̣͕̬͘É̢̡̻̩̬͞D̗̥̟͓ ̯̫P͈̺̕͟À̰̹̠̬́͟Y̝̬͏̧͟͝I̟N̙G̡̺̱̪ ̪̀Ą̶͘̕T̳̜̳́͟͡҉T͙̗̪͇É̛̮͠Ņ̛̕͢T͓̫͚̲͠I̸̹̤͉̺͢͏O̗ͅN̬!̛͟ @therealjacksepticeye

There is something for you @markiplier