me when my disabilities disable me:
Let's have some love for the angels that weren't holy.
Let's have some love for the angels that fell.
Let's have some love for the angels that questioned things.
Let's have some love for angels that don't fall into the human definition of "good".
Let's have some love for the angels that hated their jobs.
Let's have some love for the angels that didn't look like a stereotypical angel.
Let's have some love for the angels that longed to be human.
Let's have some love for the angels that felt like they should be damned instead.
Let's have some love for the angels that broke rules.
Let's have some love for the angels that don't fit with the "be not afraid" and scared the shit out of people on purpose.
Let's have some love for the angels that were friends with demons.
Let's have some love for the angels.
partly nonhuman bcuz trauma, partly nonhuman bcuz autistic, partly nonhuman bcuz i am weird, partly nonhuman bcuz thats just how it is
woke up feeling very ouppy today. goodmorning
I bring a kinda nonhuman vibe to the function that they don't like...
me: I have GOT to get weirder!
also me when I do get weirder: *visibly shaking* I'm going to be killed with hammers by everyone for being a freak.
i get that they're TRYING to be supportive but it truly irks me when a human says "don't hate on therians! they're just kids playing pretend!" vro i want to be taken seriously as a hyena and not just a kid with a playful imagination can you PLEASE stop talking
im going to take my fingers and shut your mouth with them as i would shut the beak of a bird
another one! because i have a similar question for fellow alterhumans
i (as a pet regressor & therian) would say yes unless they tell me otherwise, since i don’t really see pet regression as a “societally normal” part of humanity. but of course if someone told me it isn’t for them that’s completely fair. everyone’s different!
feel free to explain your thoughts in the comments/reblogs
been procrastinating making this but "here goes nothing" as they say for some reason
worried this is obvious, or everyone has been subconsciously meaning what I fear they mean
But, it's true so...
Here's to the otherlinkers
Not just the copinglinkers
But the funlinkers
The aeslinkers
The supportlinkers
The otherlinkers who are in-between those labels
The otherlinkers who feel none of those labels can describe why they link/they link for another reason
To ALL the otherlinkers
It seems like (this could just be me, idk) in a lot positivity posts saying that otherlinkers are valid and no lesser then therians, otherkins and fictionkins, there is a switch between using the term copinglink and otherlink, as if they are synonyms. But they aren't. One is a subset of the other, which includes alot more in it's definition. If you only mean copinglink, and are excluding the rest of us linkers, then say so. And if you aren't, then be a bit more careful on your wording, please. I am losing it slightly with this, my anxious brain can't handle the fact I have no idea over where everyone stands on this, yet I want to know
Otherlinkers are extremely valid and awesome, and are no less then voluntary identities. No matter why they link, only the linker gets to decide if they are any less then, with there link types, just how polykins can have kintypes that are more important to them than others, etc.