Season 1:

He’s so alsbcksjdb

Bran is the kid who doesn’t do shit in a group project and still gets an A

Nicknames For The Romantic Poets

-Mary “Original Goth Queen” Shelley

-Percy “Thinks Byron’s weird but is going to go with it anyway” Shelley

-Lord “Totally wants Percy to notice his bisexual ass” Byron

-William “Call Me Turdsworth One More Time” Wordsworth

-John “Small bean, Please Protect” Keats

-Samuel “Lowkey Gay For Wordsworth” Coleridge

Yes, exactly!! I’ve always loved fenhawke but they came to mean even more to me after getting out of an abusive relationship myself, and I admire Fenris’s arc so so much more. He really is probably my favorite DA character next to Zevran

Oh handshake and a hug anon, I am also a survivor of abuse and sending all my love to you. 

One of the things that I really love about DA:2 is how much not only does Hawke change, but also how much companions change and develop. They are their own people, away from Hawke.

Aveline doesn’t need Hawke in order to become Guard Captain. Anders doesn’t need Hawke in order to start the revolution. Merrill doesn’t need Hawke in order to repair the eluvian. Varric was always eventually going to find someone to go to the Deep Roads. Sebastian was going to track down the mercenaries if no one else did. I’ve no doubt Fenris would have accomplished what he wanted on his own as well but a key thing to this is - Hawke helps. 

They don’t have a magic solution, they don’t immediately fix things. Aveline asks Hawke to help her on a suspicious patrol. Anders asks Hawke to help him find ingredients. Sebastian asks Hawke to come with him to the Harimann estate. Merrill asks Hawke to help her talk to the Keeper. Varric asks Hawke to come to the Deep Roads.

The companions follow Hawke because Hawke has asked for their help and because they are friends. They don’t do things and change because of Hawke. 

They all subtly develop over the course of the game, having and pursuing their own goals as well as helping each other. In the beginning, Fenris charges into Danarius’s mansion yelling he’s not afraid but by the third act - Fenris asks Hawke for their help, tells them it would mean a lot to him, and admits that he is afraid.

Kim Jonghyun 

Romantic poets’ dnd classes

William Wordsworth - Druid. Absolutely obsessed with nature. Will spend hours staring at a single tree believes in nothing except the power of nature. 

Dorothy Wordsworth - fighter. She gets shit done herself. Respects nature and all but a little more grounded than her brother. 

Coleridge - warlock. Oh boy. His whole thing is the power of the imagination, being wishy washy with religion, opium addict, really erratic but also incredibly likeable. He would totally make a pact. 

Keats - grave Cleric. A literal doctor. But a doctor who had to deal with watching his family die from disease. Has a very complicated relationship with death, pretty emo but also a puppy dog. Keats is bae. 

Lord Byron - bard. Need I say more? 

Percy Shelley - rogue. Politically radical and just a social mess. 

Mary Shelley - wizard. Too good for Percy and just a genius. Fascinated by magic and wants to test her limits all the time and DELIVERS. 

Bonus novelist:

Jane Austen - Tough choice but I think she suits bard best. Witty and observant, knows what to say when, detail oriented, never forgets.

I’m writing a book about two characters falling in love while dealing with there different mental health problems. As someone who has mental health problems, I want to be real about it but I’m also scared I’m moving my story too fast. Any tips on how to check if your story is going to fast

The general pacing of story typically relies on the depth of events, which is not to be confused with number of events. They are related, however. You can have:

A story with a lot of events that goes into depth of the events (longer story, slower pace)

A story with a lot of events that does not go into depth (longer story, faster pace)

A story with fewer events that goes into depth  of the events(shorter story, slower pace)

A story with fewer events that does not go into depth (shorter story, faster pace)

None of those are necessarily bad, but the kind of story and specific plot the writer has in mind can help determine which place on the + chart that the story should fall. Ideally, the pacing should actually vary per what the event is, but there will still be an overall trend. A story shouldn’t give as much attention to a pit stop as it would to the climax. 

Here’s a post on pacing individual scenes. (link embedded)

Checking for pacing can be a little tough, since a lot of the skill comes from general experience with many types of stories, which contributes to knowing how things should be and how to get them there. You ask specifically about checking for a fast pace, so here are some tips, but they are in no way a substitute for a beta reader who has fresh eyes and can give you an objective evaluation:

Look at the word count of your scenes, then look at the context of that word count. If your important scenes have similar word count to the less-important ones, your story may be too fast. Important scenes should naturally have more exploration which would slow them down.

Check to see if you’re telling, not showing, specifically for things that matter. Telling speeds stories up, and while it isn’t always a bad thing since some things need to be summarized, too much can make a story too fast. Showing helps make scenes more vivid and interesting, and naturally slows pacing because it takes up much more room.

A bit more about show, don’t tell (link embedded)

Three Signs That Mean You’re Telling, Not Showing (link embedded)

Do you have intermediate scenes between major events? Some stories don’t need them, particularity plot-focused ones, but a romance should be more character-focused and therefore should have intermediate scenes.They’re typically less-meaningful scenes than direct plot events, but can help show the depth of characters and help set up major events in the story, particularly if an occurrence needs some form of set-up to make sense and not seem like it’s overly convenient or coming out of nowhere.

Do you have subplots and actual obstacles? Subplots and other obstacles naturally slow down pacing, so a story without them is going to move along very quickly. The key to working well with subplots and obstacles is that they have to tie into the main plot and they actually have to provide struggle for the characters.They are not to be treated as “filler”.

What’s your ratio of dialogue-description-exposition? A well-balanced story is a well-paced one, and dialogue should only be about 40-60% of the story. Any more and it’s very likely that a story would be read too quickly and fail to . D-D-E should be interwoven throughout a story and each scene.

Can you picture the scene with what you write? Related to the previous point, description helps give the reader a mental image of what’s happening. Only read what you’ve written, not how you imagined the scene to play out, then evaluate if you can properly envision the setting, characters, and occurrences. Not enough description often means too fast of a pace.

Good luck with your pacing!

Thinking of asking a question? Please read the Rules and Considerations to make sure I’m the right resource, and check the Tag List to see if your question has already been asked.

Brooklyn Nine-Nine characters as D&D classes/races

Jake: human fighter (who is probably based entirely off that main guy from die hard)

Boyle: dwarf cleric

Amy: elf wizard

Rosa: half orc rogue

Gina: tiefling warlock

Holt: human paladin (possibly a self insert being a black gay man in a position of power)

Terry: DM (he’s a writer and knows fantasy tropes and stuff he’d be a great DM) 

feel free to add on with other suggestions/headcanons!!

The Romantic Poets as people at my apartment complex

Blake: The old guy on the first floor who covers all his windows with newspaper and paints all his terra cotta pots bright red. He’s never spoken to me or anyone else, to my knowledge, but he’s been there longer than anyone. On a different level entirely.

Wordsworth: The next door neighbor with the most beautiful patio in the complex. He’s got all kinds of beautiful plants that are healthy, no matter how much everyone else’s are dying. Very chill, but don’t cross him. Has been here forever and has been known to get salty with the management when a repair takes too long.

Coleridge: That one guy a couple years back who we all thought had died because his mail was piling up outside his door, but as it turned out, he was really just asleep for two whole days (?????) and felt really bad for making everyone worry. Wherever he is, I hope he’s alive.

Byron: That young professional guy who broadly hinted that he had had sex on top of one of the washing machines in the laundry area, but wouldn’t say which one. (He may or may not have been messing with me.) Never seemed to work, but dressed really well and took Ubers everywhere. Actually pretty funny, but I wouldn’t want to go on a trip with him or anything. Sat on the balcony smoking a hookah.

Shelley: The friendly, yet constantly disheveled upstairs neighbor who worked for a local nonprofit and was always playing records at weird hours of the night. Walked very loudly and sang in the shower. Every night at approximately eight o’clock he’d laugh a singular laugh at something (”HA!”) and then he’d go to bed. He was pretty cool, just odd. Down for Nazi-punching.

Keats: That male nurse on the far side of the complex who snuck in a cat a couple years ago and probably has like a squillion of them now. Has one plant that is struggling for survival, but he’s doing his best with it. Always seems nice, but is low key intimidating. Has names for all the raccoons who forage in the dumpsters, and can be seen checking out the furniture that people discard.

Cool Tip

If you are like me and always need to be working on something to keep your anxiety under control, during this quarentine why not helping scientists by looking at pictures of some neat penguins? or even galaxies?  There’s this site call Zooniverse, where you can help on scientific projects by analyzing pictures and data!  Right now my favorite project has returned, called Penguin Watch (where yeah, you get to watch penguins, it’s amazing)

you basically have to analyse photos looking for penguins, their chicks, eggs or even predators and human interaction But there are lots of interesting projects you can help in areas such as biology, physics, history or even art: 

Oh and the best part, some institutions even accept it as volunteering/service hour requirements for graduation and scholarships!! It’s helping me a lot during this time, so I thought it was worth sharing