not even lukewarm but cold take: if you're a childfree woman that experiences opposite sex attraction you should only be with men that are VEHEMENTLY child-free. Men who get a vasectomy or refuse to have any sort of sex without protection. Any man that's on the fence while you're strongly convinced about the fact that you do not want children, will eventually turn on you and want children.
look I'm not even on the "you gotta always vote" train but it is funny how the people who didn't vote for harris are like...able to conceive of voting as a collective action when it comes to them not voting, but then uhm also it's just one vote in a blue state it doesn't even matter guys. okay which is it is it a collective act or like an individual nothing matters thing to do like does voting matter enough for not voting to matter or does voting not matter enough for not voting to not matter like which is it š¤
āFeminists think the goals of Traās and MtFs are unconnected-ā and you spent an entire book giving me really good reasons to continue to think that. This book says that the reason males are misogynistic is their fear of being perceived as feminine, therefore feminism should focus on helping males out of that brain hole. And the thing is⦠Feminism has tried that. Libfem bullshit has BEEN babying men and blaming women for males cruelty for supposedly being the people who wonāt let them hold purses or whatever the fuck.
Has it worked? I wouldnāt say so. I look around and still see women suffering. I think the reason males are misogynistic is because they benefit from a hierarchical system that treats women as property. I think this happens regardless of any secondary factors. Iāve seen too many feminine males defend pornography to think defense of pornography comes from some place of self loathing instead of their desire to get off no matter what. The goal of radical feminists is female liberation from a system that sees them as the property of males. The goal of ātrans feminismā is the liberation of femininity from the shackles of masculinity. I can say thatās a fine goal, but they are so fundamentally different that they require different movements.
The appeal to tradition is so funny- the amount of people who the past was good for is so small. "It's been around for ages" a lot of terrible shit has! Slavery wasn't a new invention, it existed for ages. Marital rape existed for ages. Dictatorships and monarchies existed for ages. The past is filled with hot garbage.
I mean, āall work is slavery under capitalismā is REALLY compatible with āāsex workā is bad.ā Like, the obvious logical points would be āall work is coerced/slavery in a system where you have to work to eat and live -> coerced sex is rape -> āsex workā is rape and should be abolished.ā Itās inconsistent to say, āall work is bad⦠Except for āsex workā. Without a really good reason why this is the one kind thatās not coercive.
i hate when iām talking to a leftist about why i hate prostitution as a feminist and they hit me with the āall work is slavery under capitalism, you just have a moralistic view of sexā as if iād disagree.
capitalism is literally antithetical to radical feminism, and i was socialist before i was a radical feminist.
also, why wouldnāt i have a moralistic view of sex? i have a moralistic view of everything; i think everything we do is political, and that includes the kind of sex we have and the rape we find socially acceptable. duh.
⦠Tbh it feels weird to judge any female celebrity for being mediocre while males get to be as boring as they want and make millions from it (and get to be the ones in charge of the industry at large)
Iām thinking about a stray post that I saw a while back that went something like, āYou donāt think of āprivilegeā when you think of gay malesā in the context of male privilege. And it kind of makes me think about⦠How privilege is talked about at all. Iād say a major element of privilege is blindness towards the ways it benefits you. Itās not just that youāre able bodied, itās that you donāt have to have to worry about any kind of accommodations being made for you to exist in public because the world was already made with your needs as a central focus as an example. In that sense, itās easier to look at the ways a person knows they are disadvantaged. So Gay Males are noticeably discriminated against on the basis of their homosexuality, and thatās the first thing a person will think about when they hear Gay Male. What NO ONE thinks is, āthatās a gay male, heāll never have to worry about being forced to give birth. Thatās a gay man, he lives in a world where seat belts were made with his safety in mind.ā And thatās usually fine, the ways that gay males benefit from manhood isnāt something that always needs to be brought up- the same way that a white womanās whiteness is not always relevant to the conversation.
HOWEVER, it becomes a problem when weāre talking about misogyny and people start pretending oppression exists as one scale instead of multiple axes. Admittedly this is VERY Intersectionalism 101 (and people understand this concept weirdly well when weāre talking about rich white women) but it still feels like it needs to be stated on this site.
I want to make something really clear that I think Anti-Choice people have failed to understand that Pro Choicers definitely saw coming.
An exception for Rape, Life of the Mother, and Incest mean nothing when you have to prove it in a court of law, or get a team of lawyers and judges to sign off on it which can take weeks or even months.
Weeks a person dying hasn't got. Women are now dying. Actually dying. Because hospitals legally could not save their lives until they could wake up a judge and get their lawyers, and another sides lawyers awake and up and figured out if it was actually necessary or not. All people with no understanding of medicine, and no attatchment to the person suffering who simply doesn't want to die.
There's a lot more I could cover, like the increase in illegal abortion, abortion tourism, the massive increase in infant abandonment... but I'm going to leave it here.
People are dying. People who should be alive. Who would be alive if abortion was legal and the hospital could have simply treated their patient without waiting for a dozen men with no medical experience in another building to decide if their patient actually needs treatment or not. And yes they do have to wait. Because if they don't they get charged with murder for trying to save a life.
Your policies are killing people. Not theoretical people. Not fetuses with no conscious thought or pain. Adults with lives. Teenagers with a whole life ahead of them. Mothers with children who need them. Real people with conscious thought, with fear, with pain. People who meet every definition of personhood.
I mean. 150 years is a long time from now- everyone on this site would be dead for sure. The average human lifespan is about 70 so itād be I guess another 3 generations? 3 generations where women who were silenced by the Taliban can speak, where no one is forced to give birth and every child is wanted, where significantly less people are raped (as rape is seen akin to torture), where no girls undergo genitalia mutilation, no girls are forced into marriage, women around the world are free to pursue education and no assumption is made about their competence. The death of the Quiverfull movement and no girl ever again told she exists to be a helpmeet, nor that she is the cause of the worldās ills or that her body tempts males who do not have the ability to control themselves.
And thatās the shit Iām thinking of now- the shit that matters to me personally. The world could end in 3 lifetimes anyway at least this apocalyptic scenario makes less people suffer before the end.
if you could automatically delete all misogyny in the world: like it never existed in the first place, from all cultures and across all aspects of life, but at the cost of human life existing only for the next 150 years, would you? You get rid of no more issues, capitalism and racism still exist, but misogyny doesn't, from the most violent to the most banal, but in 150 years humanity will cease to exist, not painfully or violently, just cease to exist, would you do it?
-š
It does worry me sometimes when Iām going through blogs and find a kid in Radfem spaces. I donāt interact with them and but I sincerely hope these girls are staying safe. Never post your face or body, always use a pseudonym, if someoneās making them feel unsafe or sexually harassing them have an adult they can talk to, know they donāt owe strangers anything etc.
I have preestablished biases and beliefs about the world, I acknowledge that and am willing to adjust with new information shared.
188 posts