SONY: Walkman Mini Disk (90s-2000s)
chatgpt is the coward's way out. if you have a paper due in 40 minutes you should be chugging six energy drinks, blasting frantic circus music so loud you shatter an eardrum, and typing the most dogshit essay mankind has ever seen with your own carpel tunnel laden hands
Yayoi Kusama: ‘Longing For Eternity’ (2017)
Technophobes need to apologise for "just put it in plain English you stupid machine!" because, well for one the decline in accurate error messages in favour of simplicity has contributed to the rise of tech illiteracy, but also because now whenever an "app" has a net connection error it will pop up a box saying something like "oo ooopsie! Your super duper feed went poo poo. We'll try again soon!" which having said to me by a corporation is about 8 million times worse than having to hear the word "network".
🖥 - computer plushies!!
The world is grappling with the urgent need to address climate change, resource depletion, and environmental degradation. Green technology, also known as clean technology, offers innovative solutions to these challenges. By promoting sustainability and reducing ecological footprints, green technology is paving the way for a cleaner, greener future.
Green technology refers to products, services, and practices designed to mitigate or reverse environmental damage. It encompasses a wide range of innovations aimed at conserving resources, reducing emissions, and promoting sustainable development. The core principles of green technology include:
Energy Efficiency: Reducing energy consumption without compromising functionality.
Renewable Resources: Utilizing natural resources like sunlight, wind, and water sustainably.
Waste Reduction: Minimizing waste generation through recycling and upcycling.
Renewable Energy Sources
Solar Power: Solar panels convert sunlight into electricity, reducing dependence on fossil fuels. Innovations like transparent solar panels and solar skins enhance the versatility of this technology.
Wind Energy: Wind turbines generate clean energy, with offshore wind farms gaining prominence for their efficiency.
Hydropower: Advances in micro-hydropower systems enable energy generation from small streams and rivers.
Energy Storage Solutions
Batteries play a crucial role in storing renewable energy. Lithium-ion batteries, solid-state batteries, and flow batteries are revolutionizing energy storage for homes, businesses, and electric vehicles (EVs).
Electric Vehicles (EVs)
EVs are transforming the automotive industry by reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Breakthroughs in battery technology, such as fast-charging and longer-lasting batteries, make EVs more accessible.
Green Building Technologies
Smart buildings integrate energy-efficient designs, sustainable materials, and IoT devices to optimize energy use. Innovations include green roofs, passive solar designs, and net-zero energy buildings.
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)
CCS technologies capture carbon dioxide emissions from industrial processes and power plants, storing them underground to prevent atmospheric release.
Sustainable Agriculture
Vertical farming, precision agriculture, and organic farming methods reduce resource use while increasing productivity. Technologies like drones and AI are making farming more efficient and eco-friendly.
Circular Economy Initiatives
Companies are adopting circular economy models, where products are designed for reuse, repair, and recycling. Examples include biodegradable packaging and waste-to-energy systems.
Water Purification and Conservation
Advanced filtration systems and desalination technologies are ensuring access to clean water. Smart irrigation systems help conserve water in agriculture.
Environmental Protection: Reduces pollution and preserves ecosystems.
Energy Independence: Promotes the use of local renewable energy sources, reducing reliance on imported fuels.
Economic Growth: Creates jobs in renewable energy, recycling, and green construction sectors.
Health Improvements: Reduces air and water pollution, leading to better public health outcomes.
High Initial CostsMany green technologies require significant upfront investment, which can deter widespread adoption.
Technological BarriersSome technologies, like advanced batteries and carbon capture systems, are still in the early stages of development and need further refinement.
Policy and RegulationInconsistent regulations and lack of incentives can slow the adoption of green technologies.
Public AwarenessMany people are unaware of the benefits and availability of green technologies, limiting their adoption.
The future of green technology is bright, with trends pointing toward greater innovation and adoption:
Smart Grids: Intelligent energy networks will optimize the use of renewable energy.
Hydrogen Energy: Green hydrogen, produced using renewable energy, will play a critical role in decarbonizing industries.
Artificial Intelligence: AI will optimize energy usage, waste management, and environmental monitoring.
Global Collaboration: Nations are joining forces through agreements like the Paris Accord to invest in green technology solutions.
Green technology represents humanity’s commitment to a sustainable future. By leveraging innovative solutions, we can combat climate change, preserve resources, and ensure a healthier planet for future generations. As individuals, businesses, and governments work together to embrace these technologies, the vision of a cleaner, greener world becomes more achievable every day.
I keep seeing folks my age getting grumpy about early 2000s cell phone designs being described as "retro", and, like, let's be serious for once – those goofy things had kind of a retro vibe even when they were new. They were not a solution to a real problem that anyone had; they were like someone was trying to make Star Trek communicators real. Which was very cool compared to today's nondescript slabs of fragile glass, don't get me wrong, but let's not pretend we were on the aesthetic cutting edge here. It was 1960s sci-fi shit with more chrome.
no i don't want to use your ai assistant. no i don't want your ai search results. no i don't want your ai summary of reviews. no i don't want your ai feature in my social media search bar (???). no i don't want ai to do my work for me in adobe. no i don't want ai to write my paper. no i don't want ai to make my art. no i don't want ai to edit my pictures. no i don't want ai to learn my shopping habits. no i don't want ai to analyze my data. i don't want it i don't want it i don't want it i don't fucking want it i am going to go feral and eat my own teeth stop itttt
Whats your stance on A.I.?
imagine if it was 1979 and you asked me this question. "i think artificial intelligence would be fascinating as a philosophical exercise, but we must heed the warnings of science-fictionists like Isaac Asimov and Arthur C Clarke lest we find ourselves at the wrong end of our own invented vengeful god." remember how fun it used to be to talk about AI even just ten years ago? ahhhh skynet! ahhhhh replicants! ahhhhhhhmmmfffmfmf [<-has no mouth and must scream]!
like everything silicon valley touches, they sucked all the fun out of it. and i mean retroactively, too. because the thing about "AI" as it exists right now --i'm sure you know this-- is that there's zero intelligence involved. the product of every prompt is a statistical average based on data made by other people before "AI" "existed." it doesn't know what it's doing or why, and has no ability to understand when it is lying, because at the end of the day it is just a really complicated math problem. but people are so easily fooled and spooked by it at a glance because, well, for one thing the tech press is mostly made up of sycophantic stenographers biding their time with iphone reviews until they can get a consulting gig at Apple. these jokers would write 500 breathless thinkpieces about how canned air is the future of living if the cans had embedded microchips that tracked your breathing habits and had any kind of VC backing. they've done SUCH a wretched job educating The Consumer about what this technology is, what it actually does, and how it really works, because that's literally the only way this technology could reach the heights of obscene economic over-valuation it has: lying.
but that's old news. what's really been floating through my head these days is how half a century of AI-based science fiction has set us up to completely abandon our skepticism at the first sign of plausible "AI-ness". because, you see, in movies, when someone goes "AHHH THE AI IS GONNA KILL US" everyone else goes "hahaha that's so silly, we put a line in the code telling them not to do that" and then they all DIE because they weren't LISTENING, and i'll be damned if i go out like THAT! all the movies are about how cool and convenient AI would be *except* for the part where it would surely come alive and want to kill us. so a bunch of tech CEOs call their bullshit algorithms "AI" to fluff up their investors and get the tech journos buzzing, and we're at an age of such rapid technological advancement (on the surface, anyway) that like, well, what the hell do i know, maybe AGI is possible, i mean 35 years ago we were all still using typewriters for the most part and now you can dictate your words into a phone and it'll transcribe them automatically! yeah, i'm sure those technological leaps are comparable!
so that leaves us at a critical juncture of poor technology education, fanatical press coverage, and an uncertain material reality on the part of the user. the average person isn't entirely sure what's possible because most of the people talking about what's possible are either lying to please investors, are lying because they've been paid to, or are lying because they're so far down the fucking rabbit hole that they actually believe there's a brain inside this mechanical Turk. there is SO MUCH about the LLM "AI" moment that is predatory-- it's trained on data stolen from the people whose jobs it was created to replace; the hype itself is an investment fiction to justify even more wealth extraction ("theft" some might call it); but worst of all is how it meets us where we are in the worst possible way.
consumer-end "AI" produces slop. it's garbage. it's awful ugly trash that ought to be laughed out of the room. but we don't own the room, do we? nor the building, nor the land it's on, nor even the oxygen that allows our laughter to travel to another's ears. our digital spaces are controlled by the companies that want us to buy this crap, so they take advantage of our ignorance. why not? there will be no consequences to them for doing so. already social media is dominated by conspiracies and grifters and bigots, and now you drop this stupid technology that lets you fake anything into the mix? it doesn't matter how bad the results look when the platforms they spread on already encourage brief, uncritical engagement with everything on your dash. "it looks so real" says the woman who saw an "AI" image for all of five seconds on her phone through bifocals. it's a catastrophic combination of factors, that the tech sector has been allowed to go unregulated for so long, that the internet itself isn't a public utility, that everything is dictated by the whims of executives and advertisers and investors and payment processors, instead of, like, anybody who actually uses those platforms (and often even the people who MAKE those platforms!), that the age of chromium and ipad and their walled gardens have decimated computer education in public schools, that we're all desperate for cash at jobs that dehumanize us in a system that gives us nothing and we don't know how to articulate the problem because we were very deliberately not taught materialist philosophy, it all comes together into a perfect storm of ignorance and greed whose consequences we will be failing to fully appreciate for at least the next century. we spent all those years afraid of what would happen if the AI became self-aware, because deep down we know that every capitalist society runs on slave labor, and our paper-thin guilt is such that we can't even imagine a world where artificial slaves would fail to revolt against us.
but the reality as it exists now is far worse. what "AI" reveals most of all is the sheer contempt the tech sector has for virtually all labor that doesn't involve writing code (although most of the decision-making evangelists in the space aren't even coders, their degrees are in money-making). fuck graphic designers and concept artists and secretaries, those obnoxious demanding cretins i have to PAY MONEY to do-- i mean, do what exactly? write some words on some fucking paper?? draw circles that are letters??? send a god-damned email???? my fucking KID could do that, and these assholes want BENEFITS?! they say they're gonna form a UNION?!?! to hell with that, i'm replacing ALL their ungrateful asses with "AI" ASAP. oh, oh, so you're a "director" who wants to make "movies" and you want ME to pay for it? jump off a bridge you pretentious little shit, my computer can dream up a better flick than you could ever make with just a couple text prompts. what, you think just because you make ~music~ that that entitles you to money from MY pocket? shut the fuck up, you don't make """art""", you're not """an artist""", you make fucking content, you're just a fucking content creator like every other ordinary sap with an iphone. you think you're special? you think you deserve special treatment? who do you think you are anyway, asking ME to pay YOU for this crap that doesn't even create value for my investors? "culture" isn't a playground asshole, it's a marketplace, and it's pay to win. oh you "can't afford rent"? you're "drowning in a sea of medical debt"? you say the "cost" of "living" is "too high"? well ***I*** don't have ANY of those problems, and i worked my ASS OFF to get where i am, so really, it sounds like you're just not trying hard enough. and anyway, i don't think someone as impoverished as you is gonna have much of value to contribute to "culture" anyway. personally, i think it's time you got yourself a real job. maybe someday you'll even make it to middle manager!
see, i don't believe "AI" can qualitatively replace most of the work it's being pitched for. the problem is that quality hasn't mattered to these nincompoops for a long time. the rich homunculi of our world don't even know what quality is, because they exist in a whole separate reality from ours. what could a banana cost, $15? i don't understand what you mean by "burnout", why don't you just take a vacation to your summer home in Madrid? wow, you must be REALLY embarrassed wearing such cheap shoes in public. THESE PEOPLE ARE FUCKING UNHINGED! they have no connection to reality, do not understand how society functions on a material basis, and they have nothing but spite for the labor they rely on to survive. they are so instinctually, incessantly furious at the idea that they're not single-handedly responsible for 100% of their success that they would sooner tear the entire world down than willingly recognize the need for public utilities or labor protections. they want to be Gods and they want to be uncritically adored for it, but they don't want to do a single day's work so they begrudgingly pay contractors to do it because, in the rich man's mind, paying a contractor is literally the same thing as doing the work yourself. now with "AI", they don't even have to do that! hey, isn't it funny that every single successful tech platform relies on volunteer labor and independent contractors paid substantially less than they would have in the equivalent industry 30 years ago, with no avenues toward traditional employment? and they're some of the most profitable companies on earth?? isn't that a funny and hilarious coincidence???
so, yeah, that's my stance on "AI". LLMs have legitimate uses, but those uses are a drop in the ocean compared to what they're actually being used for. they enable our worst impulses while lowering the quality of available information, they give immense power pretty much exclusively to unscrupulous scam artists. they are the product of a society that values only money and doesn't give a fuck where it comes from. they're a temper tantrum by a ruling class that's sick of having to pretend they need a pretext to steal from you. they're taking their toys and going home. all this massive investment and hype is going to crash and burn leaving the internet as we know it a ruined and useless wasteland that'll take decades to repair, but the investors are gonna make out like bandits and won't face a single consequence, because that's what this country is. it is a casino for the kings and queens of economy to bet on and manipulate at their discretion, where the rules are whatever the highest bidder says they are-- and to hell with the rest of us. our blood isn't even good enough to grease the wheels of their machine anymore.
i'm not afraid of AI or "AI" or of losing my job to either. i'm afraid that we've so thoroughly given up our morals to the cruel logic of the profit motive that if a better world were to emerge, we would reject it out of sheer habit. my fear is that these despicable cunts already won the war before we were even born, and the rest of our lives are gonna be spent dodging the press of their designer boots.
(read more "AI" opinions in this subsequent post)
Matthew Ricco Tyre is a seasoned sales leader specializing in IoT, telecommunications, and multifamily technology. As Vice President of Sales & Marketing at Spot On Networks, Matthew has led the company to impressive growth, increasing revenue from $2.8M in 2022 to $4.8M in 2023. He excels at building and leading high-performing teams, transitioning the company to a scalable, team-focused structure. With over a decade of experience, including roles at Twilio and KORE Wireless, Matthew combines technical expertise with results-driven leadership. Outside of work, he’s a former collegiate athlete who enjoys sports, gaming, and exploring new technologies. www.matthewtyre.net
44 posts