Dabi Is AMAZING And RARE Rep For Abuse Victims.

Not all venom fans are monster fuckers 😞 some of us are just aroace disasters who like the idea of a platonic soulmate who likes to murder annoying people for you, is that so bad?

Beautiful hydro dragon

commission for @addicted-to-12th-intro !!✨ "the spilling of blood and the act of creation"

My favorite ship AND favorite movie? As if you didn't already made me love your art! Now Tomura just needs to look/act a bit more like an absolutely hopeless loser and it's even more perfect. I love my loser Eddie.

But I absolutely adored how his scars are in the venom form as well. It suits him. And maybe wear like in ear headphones so he can talk to Venom/or whatever the symbiote is named in this AU without people thinking he is crazy and so he wears them all the time, just in case.

Or maybe he is already hunted for some crimes and all! Ohh I want more Lore!!

And maybe like my favorite scene with them as well? Like Tomura chilling at Toya's/Dabi's and some cops or special unit showing up and the symbiote is like, "We need to kill them all!" "No we are not going to kill people." "But... one pile of bodies, one pile of heads." "We are not going to kill them!" Or maybe they do want to kill, but Toya is around, and so he wants to appear cool and not like a serial killer.

I am very excited!! I am sure that idea has been added to the list of writing ideas!

when something’s kinda rad, but not too rad

YoI be like

Tagging this with gay fandoms sorry

There's currently a European proposition to ban conversion practice in Europe

If you're European please sigh it

If you're not please reblog

eci.ec.europa.eu

European Citizens' Initiative

Give your support !

I’m tired of hearing people say “Disney’s Cinderella is sanitized. In the original tale, the stepsisters cut off parts of their feet to make the slipper fit and get their eyes pecked out by birds in the end.”

I understand this mistake. I’m sure a lot of people buy copies of the complete Grimm’s Fairy Tales, see their tale of Aschenputtel translated as “Cinderella”, and assume what they’re reading is the “original” version of the tale. Or else they see Into the Woods and make the same assumption, because Sondheim and Lapine chose to base their Cinderella plot line on the Grimms’ Aschenputtel instead of on the more familiar version. It’s an understandable mistake. But I’m still tired of seeing it.

The Brothers Grimm didn’t originate the story of Cinderella. Their version, where there is no fairy godmother, the heroine gets her elegant clothes from a tree on her mother’s grave, and where yes, the stepsisters do cut off parts of their feet and get their eyes pecked out in the end, is not the “original.” Nor did Disney create the familiar version with the fairy godmother, the pumpkin coach, and the lack of any foot-cutting or eye-pecking.

If you really want the “original” version of the story, you’d have to go back to the 1st century Greco-Egyptian legend of Rhodopis. That tale is just this: “A Greek courtesan is bathing one day, when an eagle snatches up her sandal and carries it to the Pharaoh of Egypt. The Pharaoh searches for the owner of the sandal, finds her and makes her his queen.”

Or, if you want the first version of the entire plot, with a stepdaughter reduced to servitude by her stepmother, a special event that she’s forbidden to attend, fine clothes and shoes given to her by magic so she can attend, and her royal future husband finding her shoe after she loses it while running away, then it’s the Chinese tale of Ye Xian you’re looking for. In that version, she gets her clothes from the bones of a fish that was her only friend until her stepmother caught it and ate it.

But if you want the Cinderella story that Disney’s film was directly based on, then the version you want is the version by the French author Charles Perrault. His Cendrillon is the Cinderella story that became the best known in the Western world. His version features the fairy godmother, the pumpkin turned into a coach, mice into horses, etc, and no blood or grisly punishments for anyone. It was published in 1697. The Brothers Grimm’s Aschenputtel, with the tree on the grave, the foot-cutting, etc. was first published in 1812.

The Grimms’ grisly-edged version might feel older and more primitive while Perrault’s pretty version feels like a sanitized retelling, but such isn’t the case. They’re just two different countries’ variations on the tale, French and German, and Perrault’s is older. Nor is the Disney film sanitized. It’s based on Perrault.

I belong to the first group. One breast is breast boobiling in another way than my other breast is breast boobiling. And so my boobily breasts are not boobiling breasty in boobily harmony.

u ever walking somewhere and become aware of your tits moving and go aw fuck im breasting boobily. im literally breasting boobily right now. :(

I would just die, instead death. Like yeah, yep they died. I'm dead. The second that branch was in the momentum of falling NY body dropped dead on the floor without even a fit of coughing and puking out my lungs

Excuse me while I sneeze 30 times in a row…