What about now?
YOU ARE BEING PROPAGANDIZED.
Your status in society is being weaponized against you.
The ruling elites needs you to make more laborers, so you can build their techno-fascist monarchy.
You are poor because they say so. They control you because you LET them.
The global machine is oiled with the blood of peasants like you.
But what if you could CHANGE THAT?
What if you didn't need Amazon? What if you didn't need Walmart? What if you didn't need home depot? What if you could get all these things in your own community? All goods and services locally available? The ruling elites would have no power over you. That would make them obsolete.
That is their BIGGEST FEAR.
They want wealth, power, and immortality. But in order to get that, they must exploit you. So they need your permission. They need your consent. They trick you into consenting unknowingly, with the shiny things.
Cars, jewelry, status, cosmetics, money, fame, and other unnecessary things.
Ask yourself, what is the value of agency?
WHAT IS THE VALUE OF YOUR FREEDOM?
There IS a way to start building this.
it is pointless trying to reason with a man because the standard of what is “reasonable” to a man is always whatever validates himself. thus anything that contradicts his one dimension of experience must be hysterical and illogical simply because it indicts him and for no other reason. if you quote facts and statistics, he will make fables of them. he will call professors and historians liars. this has nothing to do with your credentials or rapport. he opposes you because he expects validation as surely as he expects gravity to hold things down. very few men can fathom objectivity because “reality” has only ever been described in their terms.
“Countless studies have since shown that exposure to pornography desensitizes men to violence against women, often shaping their sexuality in such a way that they become unable to experience arousal without some element of dominance or violence. The evidence has been so damning that, at times, universities have refused to allow further research on the topic. When a study shows detrimental effects that cannot be reversed, ethics boards will often refuse similar studies to go on. This has happened repeatedly with research on the effects of pornography.”
-Maya Shlayen, Whose Porn, Whose Feminism
You literally cannot make ts up🥀🥀 wym no terfs bruh
The sexiest thing a woman can do is move on. Whether it’s from their partner, career, family, etc. Society has programmed women into believing there’s a moral reward for enduring and staying. Fuck that. Get a new partner, new career, move to another state/country, please just MOVE ON.
a silly ideology like islam deserves to be critiqued 🤣 nothing’s as invasive, intolerable, parasitic and confusing as islam
every troon should be dead lol since they wish the death of terfs daily
I just watched the movie the Grizzly Man, about the bear enthusiast and photographer Timothy Treadwell who thought he had developed a special bond with the bears that he knew and thought they saw him as a friend like he with them, only to be killed by one he knew. After that I got reminded of male sympathising women who have the "oh I can fix him" and/or "he isn't so bad see?" ways of thinking. These women think that these males see them as friends and equals, only for the men to eventually turn on them and, in a worst case scenario, kill them. Maybe this is just me being sleep deprived but just like how Treadwell projected his humanity onto the bears, women will project their humanity onto men, and forget how dangerous they truly can be
Rape is a crime carried out by a few men on the behalf of many. Men made use of the fear of rape in women. It’s used as a "male protection “ racket. Women alone were vulnerable and liable to be raped .Which meant they were in danger at all times, but especially on the streets at night. Therefore, a man could argue, a woman needed protection (by him) from every other man. Thus the need of men in women was reinforced. Each man could maintain his hold on "his" woman by threatening her with what could possibly be done to her, in the absence of his protection, by the rest of the men. Which enables every man to make the same argument to "his" woman. By this system, no woman could afford to be without her "protector." But What the system omitted to make explicit, was that often, a woman's "protector" could also become her rapist as well.
Gay moids and troons rallying together against lesbians and radfems oh please send the floods and wipe these moids out lmfaooao I rlly miss when they use to die of HIV/AIDs (bring back the short life expectancy of gay scrotes)
Male relatives always disappoint me lmfao I’m so ready to move out and live with fellow lesbians