Like Velvet...
Bristol, Vermont
π₯π’ππ³π’π« π₯π¦π‘π’π° π¦π« π±π₯π’ π£π¬π―π’π°π± π°π²π«ππ’ππͺπ°
Anything That Moves (Summer, 1991)
β BISEXUAL FREEDOM β
Couldn't reblog because it's a community post but I really wanted to lol
So a TIF who, in that very screenshot, calls herself a "gay man" and therefore outs herself as being a homophobic heterosexual who fetishises gay men is the fault of bisexual liberals?
bisexual liberals have achieved levels of homophobia that the Westboro Baptist Church could only ever dream of
Reblog this to show support of curious women secretly reading βterfβ blogs. You can ask us questions, we wonβt out you. Youβre our sisters :)
in case anyone was forgetting what the church was all about
Feminism is in trouble. Underneath a veneer of supporting women, there's too much navel-gazing over which women deserve to be protected and which women deserve to be blamed and hated.
Misogyny is the oldest form of bigotry. It is the original form of oppression. Cultures from around the world, across time, decided that women were inferior so that men could control, rape and abuse, all in isolation.
Intersectionality is important for feminism, because misogyny is so entrenched into all sorts of different societies that it also is entrenched into every other form of bigotry, too. Every woman that happens to be part of a different oppressed group too has specific extra examples of specific misogyny that she faces because of that intersection.
That begs the question: can misogyny even be erased before every other kind of bigotry and hatred is erased? Or can no other form of bigotry be erased until misogyny is defeated?
It's interesting just how intersectionality has both the power to bring all women together of all different female lived experiences - but also the power to ensure that there can never be any form of class consciousness for women at all.
How can there be class consciousness and solidarity for all women when there are both white women that gloss over black women's lived experiences at one end, and then lesbians who victim-blame straight women for the abuse they receive at the hands of male romantic partners on the other?
Actual feminism is incredibly hard. Actual feminism means supporting and advocating for all women, not just women you like. It means offering a hand to women who have previously spat at you, or hated and abused you. Women who have been misogynistic or who promoted misogyny. Women that you otherwise (even rightly) hate. It means women who are oppressed in other ways, too, standing shoulder to shoulder with women who are part of oppressor classes because we're all women.
Especially in online spaces, it seems like the bar to be a feminist is to hate men, maybe prioritise and care for some groups of women (aside from using all women as statistics to justify hating men to focus on men again), and, if lucky, possibly a few scan-reads of some foundational texts, and then that's good enough to become a sudden shield to use so that it becomes safe again to make up some new misogynistic slurs. So that it's acceptable to understand that female socialisation is the cause for some anti-feminist behaviours, but it's all those evil women's faults and their free choices to attack and hate others depending on the narrative.
It's obvious that in online spaces, so many that describe themselves as "feminist" come from TRA spaces, because they have hierarchies of women in mind, fuck you, [identity label] woman, stupid fucking handmaiden, you get what you fucking deserve. It's just a remapping of prioritising men to prioritising certain women, like feminism is a new religion instead of a difficult movement with difficult and uncomfortable inner work, even before that has to translate to offering actual solidarity to all women that isn't just lip service.
If you call yourself a feminst, be honest with yourself: are you actually a feminist, or do you just like how the title sounds?
i'm so happy that we're in this together!
your sexuality is valid.
your attraction to males is valid
your attraction to women is valid
and you have every right to be upset about being stereotyped as a whore- as unfortunate as us bisexuals are labled.
you do not need to change your sexuality for ANYONE.
you have EVERY FUCKING RIGHT TO REJECT WHOEVER YOU WANT!
just because tras say that 'you're biesxual! you are attracted to both sexes that means you'll be attracted to me!' doesn't matter at all. YOU DATE WHO YOU WANT TO DATE!
you absolutely deserve the company of people that respect you for being bisexual. that don't try to force you into the gay or straight role
and you absolutely deserve to be around people that love you for who you are and won't try to change you because of that <3
i love you <3
from one bisexual radfem sister to another
The beautiful remains of some stained glass in the old church burned down during the world war in coventry...
Any man that wants or accepts a platform should always be treated, at the very least, with the greatest suspicion.
Great feminist acts for woman are organising, protesting, connecting with other women, fundraising, researching, writing - all kinds of different ways to raise class consciousness and fight the patriarchy exist that every woman of every means and ability can do.
Actual male allies can do the basics required of them by actually sharing physical and mental labour with the women in their lives, ditching weaponised incompetence, refusing to use porn, standing up against other men being misogynistic in their presence, etc.
To fight patriarchy, women need to come together to fight the system oppressing us.
Men, on the other hand, need to improve themselves in their own private lives. If they genuinely care, then they don't need a platform to do the fucking dishes.
Feminists really need to stop giving male βfeministsβ a platform