Me Scripting That He Can't Live W/o Me, Feels Incomplete W/o Me, Fell In Love With Me At First Sight,

me scripting that he can't live w/o me, feels incomplete w/o me, fell in love with me at first sight, im the one for him, he's his best when with me, im his last thought when he gts and his first when he wakes up, im the best he's ever had/will have, the thought of us breaking up physically sickens him, absolutely head over heels in love with me, and that we're cosmically intertwined, soulmates, destined/meant to be, soul bonded & endgame

Me Scripting That He Can't Live W/o Me, Feels Incomplete W/o Me, Fell In Love With Me At First Sight,

More Posts from Nab3rries and Others

1 month ago

"proving" shifting through scientific evidence (& philosophic theory)

"proving" Shifting Through Scientific Evidence (& Philosophic Theory)
"proving" Shifting Through Scientific Evidence (& Philosophic Theory)
"proving" Shifting Through Scientific Evidence (& Philosophic Theory)

this post is heavily inspired by @voldyateme on tiktok. i saw her video and decided to do research on my own, and write a detailed post about this topic to make myself understand better. i also would like to mention that some of the claims irene made in her tiktok were wrong (and biased) i also wanted to clear some things up for myself.

fyi: long post ahead. this took me three days to understand and write. i might still be a bit unclear on my understanding of some aspects, but to avoid having to write a whole novel on the subject, i simplified my findings and shortened them by a lot.

-

john clauser is a physicist who won the nobel peace prize in 2022 for his work on quantum entanglement. his theory confirms that quantum particles can be entangled across vast distances, and that their behaviors are instantly connected, even if they're light years apart.

a very simplified example:

i: you create two entangled particles

ii: you send particle A to tokyo, and particle B to paris

iii: a person in tokyo measures particle A and sees it spinning up, then instantly, meaning instantly, faster than light, the person in paris will know particle B is spinning down

this is simply based on particle A or B's observation, w/o there having to be sent any message or signal between them. they behave as if they're one system - not two separate ones.

the moment you measure one particle, you're instantly aware of the other particle's state.

⭒ relating quantum entanglement to shifting:

okay so now we know that entangled particles act as of they're one system, even through long distances. so, if everything was once connected to the big bang, then on some level, everything may still be entangled. meaning you, your consciousness and other "versions" of yourself in other realities.

this could therefore suggest that we are already connected to all possible versions of ourselves. they exist within a quantum field of potential, and our awareness can shift between these versions by tuning into the version we desire - essentially by choosing a different frequency.

say you're listening to the radio. you know that you’re able to listen to any radio broadcast because there are thousands playing at the same exact time, but you choose which one to listen to, knowing you have the choice to change it to another.

it's the same exact with shifting. you know that there are endless versions of you in existence right this moment - you only have to choose to become aware of your desired self.

-

john wheeler, another physicist, proved that reality is directly linked to our consciousness and what we observe. it's been demonstrated that particles don't move until they're actually observed. so if we're not observing something, it doesn't have a definite state at all. this is called the "observer effect"

the effect has challenged and in some ways helped disprove einstein's theory of realism. einstein believed that that the physical world exists independently of whether we observe it or not.

example: according to einstein, if a tree falls in a forest and no one is there to observe it, the tree still falls. this is shown to be false on a quantum level. that said, we can't w/ certainty say that the tree does (or doesn’t) exist if no one is perceiving it (confusing, trust me, i know)

wheeler also proved that particles will change their makeup based on our choices and observation. simplified, this means that reality doesn't fully decide its state until it's observed. it can have different outcomes, and our choices affect the past behavior of particles.

⭒ relating the observer effect to shifting:

we know that quantum particles don't take on a definite form or "reality" until they're observed. this implies that our observation plays a direct role in shaping reality - not just by watching, but also deciding. this implies that reality isn't fixed, but fluid, shaped by our decisions, thoughts and observations and means we can "choose" our reality.

quantum physics shows that reality isn't fixed until observed, observation and consciousness do play a key role and that multiple outcomes are possible. so our consciousness focus can be said to be the mechanism that "shifts" us into a desired timeline or reality.

-

way before quantum physics existed, george berkley, a philosopher in the 1700s argued the idea "to be is to be perceived", which is eerily similar to what scientists are exploring today.

he believed that physical objects don't exist independently of our own perception. so if no one is for example perceiving a tree, then it doesn't exist.

berkeley said that there is no such thing as matter existing on its own w/o a mind to perceive it. BUT! there's a twist. you see, berkley also argued the existence of God being necessary to explain how the world works within his theory of perception and idealism.

okay so, to simplify because it can be really confusing:

i: physical things only exist if they're being perceived.

ii: when humans aren't perceiving things, God is.

iii: the reason why the world keeps existing even when we're not looking is because God is always "watching".

this raises the question: if we're not perceiving something, and the only reason it exists because God is, then how do we know it actually exists when we're not perceiving it?

berkeley responded:

"we know it exists because we can come back and perceive it again, and it behaves consistently"

if you look at a tree, walk away, come back. it's still there. berkeley argued that you assume the tree existed the whole time because when you go back, the tree would still be there, at the exact same spot.

this consistency would therefore be explained by God's continuous perception of it. so even though you didn't perceive it the whole time, the fact that reality is orderly and consistent is reliable "proof" that something (God) kept it there.

critics have argued back that assuming God is perceiving all the time isn't proof that He actually is, so how would we know that?

the answer is: w/o God, things would just pop in and out of existence every time we blink and that doesn't happen. so God is used to explain why the world is consistent and stable even when we're not watching.

you can't personally perceive something that you're not perceiving, but you trust that it's still there when you go back there, because of God.

berkeley's theory is still relevant today because the things he imagined in the 1700s do line up w/ scientific discoveries today and i resonate w/ his theory, so i just had to include it even though God’s existence isn’t proven. it’s fascinating, really.

⭒ relating george’s idealism to reality shifting:

if, like berkeley said, things only exist when they're being perceived, and if reality stays consistent because someone is always perceiving it, then that means perception isn't just passive, it's creative and shapes what exists.

this ties back to shifting beacuse it suggests that your desired reality doesn't need to "appear" in front of you for it to be real - it only needs to be perceived. if you consciously focus on your dr, perceiving it in your mind as real, then by berkeley's logic, it is real, maybe not in the physical sense just yet, but within the field of awareness that gives rise to reality in the first place.

so basically: if reality is perception based, and you're perceiving your dr, then you're giving form to something that exists because you're actively perceiving it, and you are capable of being in that place.


Tags
3 weeks ago

i am officially divorced from this reality. paperwork done. lawyers hired. fees paid. went to court. the bitch can have the kids too because i'm not bringing that baggage with me. we're over.


Tags
3 weeks ago

me when my s/o breathes

Me When My S/o Breathes
4 weeks ago

I need to just be silly and dancing with my man in my dr, not studying for exams in this reality. That's all I want

1 month ago

“you should appreciate this reality more, it might help!”

me: *takes a good hard look at this reality* uhm… no <3

why appreciate the reality where people’s rights are being taken away when i can be in a reality where things like homophobia, racism, ableism, etc. don’t exist? 🤨

1 month ago

acceptance it is not going to hurt.

there are no quests. no moral choices. no divine prophecies. your worthiness is not questioned by your suffering . . . yet, you are still trapped. you are in your own cage.

why are you treating shifting like a quest? as if you are the hero in this greek myth, encountering gods and magical objects, evolving and understanding the world by completing a task who looked bigger than you. and your reward? is going back home.

but, it can be easy. and you are not used to this.

it looks like enemy territory. when people around you seemed to have it simple and you had to put twice of their effort to even accomplish something. it feels like everything you did in life is not worthy; simple tasks required hours of your time, and something as . . . whimsical as shifting, is simple? you are holding on your past experiences because that’s all you know. at the end you still accomplished those tasks, so with shifting is going to be the same.

but what if it’s the holding that it’s hurting you? accepting to let go is not a cruel joke. the cruelty is staying in a situation that is not helping you . . . and everything you accomplished in your life is not going to disappear because you acknowledged that something can be easy. acceptance doesn’t ask you to forget. it’s healing your suffering. it wants to make you understand that your cage is not everything that exists in the world.

accept it. the cage is open. you can walk away.

3 weeks ago

i have too many drs i want to shift to.

i want to make a pjo dr but like. change almost everything. add different quests. i will be a daughter of dionysus but less wine aunt vibes more unhinged god of insanity vibes . do i make myself fall into tartarus ? idk depends on how i’m feeling (i won’t do that. i think. i don’t hate myself THAT much)

i am eternally in my percy jackson era. Just like i’m in my harry potter era all the time. i read them at just the right age and now they are cemented in my mind. i make dam jokes and make fun of jason grace ALWAYSSSS

anyways i don’t know what this rant was for. i want to be percy jacksons scary girlfriend. that’s all. bye


Tags
1 month ago

can't believe tom riddle can make me giggle in another universe. when did i get here. how did this happen. i was supposed to hate that man


Tags
1 month ago

I just found out that I can script that it is totally normal not to wear a bra in any context and that motivated me so freaking much 'cause I'm gonna be so comfortable...


Tags
1 month ago

i’m literally so done with this reality i am going to script a new dr where i literally relive life (from the very start) in an earth where discrimination (of any sort) capitalism the patriarchy misogyny colonialism and other shit stuff has never existed and never will and just chill tf out. Not like my better cr drs where i do a fix-it au with my life. No. A completely different live. I’m so done

ok bye


Tags
  • xxviperloverxx
    xxviperloverxx liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • astroc0re
    astroc0re liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • aajjndndkekwiwwiw
    aajjndndkekwiwwiw liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • lullabiesforlosers
    lullabiesforlosers liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • myadmiringmind
    myadmiringmind liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • rosyrituals
    rosyrituals liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • nossvioblure
    nossvioblure liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • lawww-liet
    lawww-liet liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • ferriwinkle
    ferriwinkle reblogged this · 2 weeks ago
  • sosleephye
    sosleephye liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • yaoiboss
    yaoiboss liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • chrysanthemum19
    chrysanthemum19 liked this · 2 weeks ago
  • loreene
    loreene liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • walkingtalkinglibrary
    walkingtalkinglibrary liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • dcathst9r
    dcathst9r liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • mythos70921
    mythos70921 liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • suivezlelapinblanco
    suivezlelapinblanco liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • astrophel11
    astrophel11 liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • shiftingwmaryamm
    shiftingwmaryamm liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • pprettypinkprincesss
    pprettypinkprincesss liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • sl4ught3r3d
    sl4ught3r3d liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • jxstamour
    jxstamour reblogged this · 3 weeks ago
  • jxstamour
    jxstamour liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • millieprinceton
    millieprinceton liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • whatis-stuff
    whatis-stuff liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • vampbellasblog
    vampbellasblog liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • brightersour
    brightersour reblogged this · 3 weeks ago
  • ohsilco
    ohsilco liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • rubscubs
    rubscubs liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • nebulanaa
    nebulanaa liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • generousbearpersonpsychic
    generousbearpersonpsychic liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • penguinologist
    penguinologist liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • 222fairy222
    222fairy222 liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • unknownshrimp
    unknownshrimp liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • starrcard
    starrcard liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • nimbusandy
    nimbusandy liked this · 3 weeks ago
  • malikadurden
    malikadurden liked this · 4 weeks ago
  • miyaaraii
    miyaaraii liked this · 4 weeks ago
  • rimzip
    rimzip liked this · 4 weeks ago
  • carolloveswaffles
    carolloveswaffles liked this · 4 weeks ago
  • calecitashifting
    calecitashifting liked this · 4 weeks ago
  • sjjjajaja
    sjjjajaja liked this · 1 month ago
  • sxphrosynee827
    sxphrosynee827 liked this · 1 month ago
  • dzuuuliaa
    dzuuuliaa liked this · 1 month ago
  • feitanvchrollo
    feitanvchrollo liked this · 1 month ago
  • arioeros
    arioeros liked this · 1 month ago
  • poststhatslayy
    poststhatslayy liked this · 1 month ago
  • appleg1rl
    appleg1rl liked this · 1 month ago
nab3rries - Sam sam Sam
Sam sam Sam

be ugly and know beauty

226 posts

Explore Tumblr Blog
Search Through Tumblr Tags