... So, uh, assuming that that place is a recycling plant that is aware of what your workplace is doing, that would actually be good. Not as good as if they actually used different bags for each type, nor as good as if types that don't need them used open packaging, simplifying by not having the either plastic or paper bags having to be removed, but still...
Now, if that place is just a dump, possibly with burner, or their not saying that they do this, that'd be the sort of issue that should be counted against them. It's hardly the only factor in being 'green', so they could've won on other basises, but it wouldn't really be expected.
Hilariously, if you go to the actual Reddit thread (https://www.reddit.com/r/csMajors/comments/1f8x5ma/world_record_rejection/), the poster of the story is saying that
1: That's not his position; he's called the tech lead. and 2: There was a lot of other reasons to fire that HR department, it's just that what he did was what finally convinced the higher ups to actually go and do it. He just simplified the story for the sake of the Reddit post.
System A has to fight an eldritch horror. While all their singlet friends are running away or fainting, they look on with only a mild headache. Curious at this human's ability to withstand their incomprehensibility, the Horror asks, "How do you look at me without consequence?"
System A shrugs. "Dude, I dissociate all the time – and that makes the whole WORLD eldritch to me. You're just part of a typical Tuesday."
This statement makes sense to me. Quite frankly, my issue with the posts in question, except for one case where your blaming pro-endos for stuff that I know the pro-endo community helped the previous primary fronter unlearn after she learnt it from certain anti-endos claiming relevant trauma, is that they cap off with, or otherwise include, typically in essence, “QED endos aren’t real”.
Also, thanks for the reminder that now that we’re properly active we probably should at least have non-anon asks on? Yeah. Not that the others are active much, but...
The only thing here I’m willing to contend is the “not a comparable experience”. Irregardless of deeper dissimilarities, the experiences are similar enough that people who would wind up deciding their Endogenic are decently likely to run into Traumagenic communities and vise-versa, and there’s no real way to stop that beyond having a shared community on the surface level built to filter people to the relevant community via private links - which is the cited reason that when the non-disordered systems community tried to split off its terms wound up in the disordered systems community. (Its also the cited reason that both sometimes wander into tulpamancy spaces, though I’m told that tends to resolve a bit quicker - and tulpamancers get a lot less upset about terminology theft!)
Bluh, IDK how to really shorten that, and its not got real evidence in there, more so stating my opinion.
Anyhow, I had an actual next statement before I thought of that statement and shall now go onto it. While in retrospect I can see how it would be a problem, I had expected DMs. This is because we’ve seen other traumagenic systems attacked by anti-endos on the basis that they can’t be real, and I have what I’m pretty sure is a reasonable level of fear over that, since the system I’m in is *weird*.
@niavirrivain because of the stalking and harassment I'm currently going through, I'm not comfortable responding to the comments and giving out my main. I was going to send you an ask, but you have those turned off, so a post it is.
I am, for all intents and purposes, endo neutral at this point. I don't care what endos are doing in their corner of the internet. My blog and posts at this point specifically discuss sources and myths in regards to the DSM and DID/OSDD. I don't debate the existence of endos anymore, but I do point out that proof of their existence isn't going to come from the DSM, and it's not a comparable experience to DID/OSDD.
Very often this involves an anti endo stance within posts and syscourse. My stance, though, doesn't negate the sources or truth. In other words, just because someone doesn't like my stance, doesn't mean the post about the cultural exclusion (for example) is wrong. Worded from an anti endo standpoint? Yes, but the main point that the exclusion isn't meant for endogenic systems still stands.
Anyone, regardless of stance or origin, is welcome to send me asks about clarifying, explaining, or debunking sources. I encourage people to send me new sources to look at. It's up to you to take that information and make your own informed decision, and it doesn't matter who or what you are, I will help you understand things if you ask.
I decided to create something that I wish I had when I first got diagnosed with autism - so here’s my comic for ASDComicTakeover! You can find out more about the project here!
Keep reading
I'm... fairly confident you don't need to be familiar with the source material to understand. I've not seen this part before and my understanding of the overall source material is entirely from Tumblr, and yet, am entirely confident I understand the vibe.
Also, surprised it took seeing both of your reblogs to realise who, exactly, left those tags.
I used to be a very unemotive person before I transitioned but in recent years emotions have become a lot more intense and they make it to my face a lot easier. Sometimes I'll think of something funny and just full on laugh to myself like an idiot like
Question: how did you get the link to agree with the claim? This is a one question quiz. Naturally, that means it is probably based on some obscure lore, so I trust you, but how?
hello homestuck kinnies that live in my computer
i finally went ahead and made a classpect quiz based on my personal conception of how things work. that means it's probably one of the more accurate classpect quizzes out there. consists of two parts. 20 questions total. go take it, share it, argue about it, whatever. have fun.