Best Reaction To Dimple I've Gotten Out Of Anyone. Cackling

its so scary to put yourself out there but a SINGLE message saying "hi i loved what you made it touched me in some way" makes it all worth it 10000%

In school mode, Sakura says she wants to put an end to her attraction to him, insinuating she will instead want to date Naegi. The argument that she can't be with Aoi (or any character that isn't Kenshiro, for that matter) loses weight here. Clearly, she isn't dating him as admitted here OR knows she can not be with him forever and she fully has the potential to move on.

“You shouldn’t ship Sakura with Aoi because Sakura canonically has a boyfriend!”

1. Sakura and Kenshiro have mutual interest in each other, that doesn’t mean they are dating. Kenshiro is never referred to as Sakura’s boyfriend.

2. Kenshiro is literally dying, it’s completely understandable that Sakura moves on and is able to fall in love again. Even if he wasn’t, Hope’s Peak has changed Sakura and she’s discovered new parts of herself.

3. I can ship whatever I want. #Sakuraoi4ever

you guys know you can just dislike things right. you dont have to find a reason that ship is bad, you can just Not like it. you can just say "fucking hate those guys" and move on. it's okay. this is not a failure on your part to have a preference

(Context)

There’s also a large grey area between an Offensive Stereotype and “thing that can be misconstrued as a stereotype if one uses a particularly reductive lens of interpretation that the text itself is not endorsing”, and while I believe that creators should hold some level of responsibility to look out for potential unfortunate optics on their work, intentional or not, I also do think that placing the entire onus of trying to anticipate every single bad angle someone somewhere might take when reading the text upon the shoulders of the writers – instead of giving in that there should be also a level of responsibility on the part of the audience not to project whatever biases they might carry onto the text – is the kind of thing that will only end up reducing the range of stories that can be told about marginalized people. 

A japanese-american Beth Harmon would be pidgeonholed as another nerdy asian stock character. Baby Driver with a black lead would be accused of perpetuating stereotypes about black youth and crime. Phantom Of The Opera with a female Phantom would be accused of playing into the predatory lesbian stereotype. Romeo & Juliet with a gay couple would be accused of pulling the bury your gays trope – and no, you can’t just rewrite it into having a happy ending, the final tragedy of the tale is the rock onto which the entire central thesis statement of the play stands on. Remove that one element and you change the whole point of the story from a “look at what senseless hatred does to our youth” cautionary tale to a “love conquers all” inspiration piece, and it may not be the story the author wants to tell.

Sometimes, in order for a given story to function (and keep in mind, by function I don’t mean just logistically, but also thematically) it is necessary that your protagonist has specific personality traits that will play out in significant ways in the story. Or that they come from a specific background that will be an important element to the narrative. Or that they go through a particular experience that will consist on crucial plot point. All those narrative tools and building blocks are considered to be completely harmless and neutral when telling stories about straight/white people but, when applied to marginalized characters, it can be difficult to navigate them as, depending on the type of story you might want to tell, you may be steering dangerously close to falling into Unfortunate Implications™. And trying to find alternatives as to avoid falling into potentially iffy subtext is not always easy, as, depending on how central the “problematic” element to your plot, it could alter the very foundation of the story you’re trying to tell beyond recognition. See the point above about Romeo & Juliet.    

Like, I once saw a woman a gringa obviously accuse the movie Knives Out of racism because the one latina character in the otherwise consistently white and wealthy cast is the nurse, when everyone who watched the movie with their eyes and not their ass can see that the entire tension of the plot hinges upon not only the power imbalance between Martha and the Thrombeys, but also on her isolation as the one latina immigrant navigating a world of white rich people. I’ve seen people paint Rosa Diaz as an example of the Hothead Latina stereotype, when Rosa was originally written as a white woman (named Megan) and only turned latina later when Stephanie Beatriz was cast  – and it’s not like they could write out Rosa’s anger issues to avoid bad optics when it is such a defining trait of her character. I’ve seen people say Mulholland Drive is a lesbophobic movie when its story couldn’t even exist in first place if the fatally toxic lesbian relationship that moves the plot was healthy, or if it was straight.                          

That’s not to say we can’t ever question the larger patterns in stories about certain demographics, or not draw lines between artistic liberty and social responsibility, and much less that I know where such lines should be drawn. I made this post precisely to raise a discussion, not to silence people. But one thing I think it’s important to keep in mind in such discussions is that stereotypes, after all, are all about oversimplification. It is more productive, I believe, to evaluate the quality of the representation in any given piece of fiction by looking first into how much its minority characters are a) deep, complex, well-rounded, b) treated with care by the narrative, with plenty of focus and insight into their inner life, and c) a character in their own right that can carry their own storyline and doesn’t just exist to prop up other character’s stories. And only then, yes, look into their particular characterization, but without ever overlooking aspects such as the context and how nuanced such characterization is handled. Much like we’ve moved on from the simplistic mindset that a good female character is necessarily one that punches good otherwise she’s useless, I really do believe that it is time for us to move on from the the idea that there’s a one-size-fits-all model of good representation and start looking into the core of representation issues (meaning: how painfully flat it is, not to mention scarce) rather than the window dressing.

I know I am starting to sound like a broken record here, but it feels that being a latina author writing about latine characters is a losing game, when there’s extra pressure on minority authors to avoid ~problematic~ optics in their work on the basis of the “you should know better” argument. And this “lower common denominator” approach to representation, that bars people from exploring otherwise interesting and meaningful concepts in stories because the most narrow minded people in the audience will get their biases confirmed, in many ways, sounds like a new form of respectability politics. Why, if it was gringos that created and imposed those stereotypes onto my ethnicity, why it should be my responsibility as a latina creator to dispel such stereotypes by curbing my artistic expression? Instead of asking of them to take responsibility for the lenses and biases they bring onto the text? Why is it too much to ask from people to wrap their minds about the ridiculously basic concept that no story they consume about a marginalized person should be taken as a blanket representation of their entire community?

It’s ridiculous. Gringos at some point came up with the idea that latinos are all naturally inclined to crime, so now I, a latina who loves heist movies, can’t write a latino character who’s a cool car thief. Gentiles created antisemitic propaganda claiming that the jews are all blood drinking monsters, so now jewish authors who love vampires can’t write jewish vampires. Straights made up the idea that lesbian relationships tend to be unhealthy, so now sapphics who are into Brontë-ish gothic romance don’t get to read this type of story with lesbian protagonists. I want to scream.      

And at the end of the day it all boils down to how people see marginalized characters as Representation™ first and narrative tools created to tell good stories later, if at all. White/straight characters get to be evaluated on how entertaining and tridimensional they are, whereas minority characters get to be evaluated on how well they’d fit into an after school special. Fuck this shit.                            

Last Song - Bat Country by Avenged Sevenfold.

Last TV Show - The last show I watched willingly was probably an episode of DanDaDan.

Last Book - Probably a book about Hanzi?

Last Movie - I haven't watched a movie in a while. The last one I watched may have been Halloween Kills.

Favorite Color - Orange.

Sweet/Savory/Spicy - Out of these, I like sweet things most, but savory can be good. Salty is my real favorite.

Relationship Status - Single.

Last Google - GameCube. I was looking for a photo of a GameCube controller because of a conversation I was having.

Current Obsession - Guilty Gear.

Looking Forward To - Receiving a controller that hopefully works and I don't have trouble with. Fingers crossed.

@murmurmurl @krumbkkyu + anyone who may want to join.

10 things for 10 people you'd like to know better

I was tagged by @lampambivalence. heheheh. now i have friends on tumblr who will tag me in ask games. heheheh. hehehehehhh.

Last song - For Elise by Saint Motel (its on my discover weekly!)

Last TV show - Love is Blind s7, my partner n I LOVE that shit.

Last book - Sorcery and Small Magics by Maiga Doocy. Haven't finished it yet but I like it a lot

Last Movie- Companion. Good Movie. :3

Favourite colour - porple. Fave is lavender yes im basic i know.

Sweet/savoury/spicy - savory but it must have spice to it yummee

Relationship status - Taken! We celebrated 3 years in March <3

Last google - "miitopia black hair" (wanted to make my dnd character. he has dreads. miitopia fucking sucks.)

Current obsession - oh. uh. definitely not british youtubers dan and phil. no. nope. uh. dont look at me. (also its always pokemon 24/7)

Looking forward to - moving in with my partner and living with them for the first time <3 2 weeksssss

I am tagging @mars-ipan @local-space-gay @stellamity @hannihilatorr (and anybody else who would like to participate pls just go for it) (no pressure to play @ those i tagged)

Please support this campaign for Gaza's children and elderly! It's spearheaded by a father in Gaza who works hard on distributing aid within his camp. Getting a supply of diapers is especially critical because they're costing $65-$75 per pack and so parents are resorting to makeshift cloth diapers that are giving their babies rashes.

(Ignore the end of the video where I tell people to comment, that's for algorithmic platforms, here you can just reblog)

I'm going to time how long it takes Murl to like this post.

Why was I not following you. What the hell. Fucked up

How dare you.

The “Ran” in Rantaro’s name means orchid. Taro is a suffix that can be used for the eldest son, which adds up since all of Rantaro’s sisters are younger.

Since he has a flower name, I’d like to suggest some names I thought of for his sisters, all relating to flowers. Also, I am aware many of them are stepsisters, so it wouldn’t make sense for them to all correlate, but this is just something I think is cute. I didn’t include any flower names already used like Aoi or Sakura.

Tsubaki (Camellia)

Shion (Aster)

Azami (Thistle)

Yuri (Lily)

Tsubomi (Bud)

Kiku (Chrysanthemum)

Sumire (Violet)

Ayame (Iris)

Satsuki (Rhododendron)

Renge (Lotus Flower)

Tsutsuji (Azalea)

Himari (Similar to Himawari / Sunflower)