I Will Give $100 To Anyone Who Can Spot The Difference✌

So the first pic is a deptiction of the plot below, relating to the Fibonacci sequence.

What is this fuckery?

It might describe 'feedback loops" and self-interference patterns of a regression in dynamical information geometry; a set of information transforms.

The neat aspect is that if you expand the "outside frame" (the overall shell with the varying diameters), then neat 'coincidences' happen: the expanded 'virtual lines' often end or cross exactly at points at the "shell"...

I will play with finding loop sequences, as it's really thrilling.

Furtherly, it might also make sense to describe momentum and position of elementary particles depicting them as "progression of a dynamical information geometry". Plus the conceptions regarding relativistic aspects is in parallel 'production', and interestingly, although I didn't intend to put both aspects of my current work (this one and the relativity conception) together, they are each other's interesting addition. Someahat they "weave each other"... These thought processes are somewhat like the two perfectly symmetric, yet antithetic 'loops' of the first picture here. And it is like, so neat! The chaos literally sorts itself.

the fact that marc takes every same step steven takes before sleeping to ensure he knows when he's been awake when gets home before the shift, like cleaning the blood, changing clothes, putting the tape on the door, the sand around the bed (unless he carefully steps over it when he leaves which cool), and chaining himself to the bed again is hilarious cause like, dude's a mercenary yet he cannot let poor shop gift-ist steven realise his body is out there in the world, god knows where, every night, sometimes for a couple days, fighting the leader of a cult and his minions to try and stop them from murdering people and all in the name of khonshu, an egyptian god

it's hilarious and i love it

nevermind this kid is perfect to play percy 💀

“Kiss me until I am sick of it.” 💜

I give you: memes that I think would exist in the grishaverse

hahah ayes

my childhood in one picture

Sometimes I think that I could be the beautiful sword wielding girl with a dark past then I have the misfortune of remembering that I'm a fucking nerd who uses books as escapism.

truer words cannot be spoken

me to any fictional character i hate: well you're not even real you dumb bitch

me to any fictional character i love: why aren't you real you dumb bitch

https://bluemoonlagoon94.tumblr.com/post/678007640683610112/could-there-be-an-common-theme-of-our-reality-that

What are your thoughts on this?

Interestingly Richard Fenyman remarked the occurence of the Fibonacci sequence and the 'golden angle' (primary part of the fine structure constant) in his work on quantum mechanics. And according to my information progression stuff, yes it wouldn't surprise me that this elementary principle of 'self-replication" might be one of the fundamental underlying patterns.

This is a plain idea I head: dividing the Fibonacci numbers: Larger Fib. number/smaller Fib. number (like 3/2 or 8/5) results in a damped wave alterating around large PHI (1.618...) and smaller number/larger number (like 2/3 or 5/8) results in a damped wave around small phi (0.618...) in the pic I just combined them in a strange axes system - and it's fun to imagine what would happen if you cause torsion and skews upon that visualized model:

Interestingly, the Fibonacci numbers also exist in a certain interference-diffraction pattern/fourier transform, Fraunhofer diffraction to be more concrete.

Made a post about that some days ago(or was it weeks already?): (Although the stretched x-axis is not really required)

In concrete, these describe position probabilities of superposed/entangled elementary particles. It is the pattern recognized in the double slit experiement.

Secondly, as the standard distribution also has connections to the concept of Pascal's triangle, in which the pattern of the fibonacci numbers are also omni-present, this would hint even more on the fundamentality of this logical sequence. But what is it concretely interpreted? In a different approach of interpretation, the Fibonacci sequence can be ragarded as a simple replication sequence, of continuing certain progression patterns, somewhat, yes it sounds silly: "Past+Present=Future, and Present=Past+more previous past", although it is far too simplified if taken literally. In a very rough pattern, this might be correct. But the exact details are generated by that same process just interacting with uncountable similar parallel versions of it (these are what i regarded as butterfly clones in my thesis)- chaos theorists might call them "feedback loops", and you can imagine it as a ball of uncountable worms knotting each other...

what happens if you take away otto’s actuators?

a master post of replies to this tweet