I like this aesthetic :))
🦢 our lady of sorrows 🕯
daily reminder that jeffrey dean morgan loves you!! trust 🤞
︶ִֶָ⏝︶ִֶָ⏝˖ ࣪ ୨ ♰ ୧ ࣪ ˖⏝ִֶָ︶⏝ִֶָ︶
Sorry for the late reply but thank you very much‼️
Today has been such a bad day, so seeing this me feel so much better (〃´▽`) /srs /gen
Also if you have a p/o or an f/o or a significant other anything similar then they also love you(if you want them to) ((o(^∇^)o)) /srs
Here's some pictures of him(if you ever send something similar like this and the pictures bother you then tell me and I won't add the pictures):
He's so dreamie especially in the 8th picture!! And he's so strong too and most of these are new pictures that I got from pinterest (//∇//)
︶ִֶָ⏝︶ִֶָ⏝˖ ࣪ ୨ ♰ ୧ ࣪ ˖⏝ִֶָ︶⏝ִֶָ︶
Guys. I think this might be me(or transplural, I can't decide yet) (*^▽^)/★*☆♪ /srs
Multiself is an umbrella term for any singlet/singlet adjacent being that experiences multiple identities/selves. The term also applies to individual sysmates that share the experience, provided the sysmate/s in question identify as multiself independently from the rest of the collective.
Mulitself beings may or may not "switch" between selves, though multiself is explicitly separate from the plurality spectrum and does not describe multiple consciousnesses/distinct people. However it's important to note that SOME parasian/plurallet experiences may fall under the multiself umbrella
• You can identify as both transplural/transmedian and multiself at the same time, in the same way that you can identify as a both a boy and a girl at the same time. Trans identity is very complex, and often paradoxical in nature
• Generally switches are amnesia free and voluntary, but this is definitely more of a guideline than a hard and fast rule. (I myself have light amnesia, and experience "switches" more as kinshifts rather than a conscious choice.)
• Multiself is inherently tied to transid, in the sense that selves have their own distinct sets of transids. Though notably, the amount in which the selves differentiate depends on the individual. On one end of the spectrum, one's selves may be extremely different in name, appearance, age, race, gender etc. On the other end of the spectrum, one's selves may be entirely identical except for each selves trans/trispersonality ids
(Note: this is general language for the umbrella term, and may not be applicable to more specific labels that fall underneath it)
Shift (verb): The experience of changing selves
"I'm shifting into Mallory"
Form (verb): The experience of forming new selves
"I formed Riley yesterday"
Mindset (noun): The term used to describe which self you currently identify as
"I'm in Monty and Jamie's mindset right now"
Primary self (noun): The self you most commonly identify as
"I'm in Darce's mindset most often, they're my primary self"
Selves are not separate consciousnesses, though we/us language is also acceptable if you feel more comfortable using it. If you wish to refer to all your selves at once, but want to avoid being mistaken for a system, you could simply say "my selves", or "my cluster"
Those that choose to have multiselves: dark pink
Those that do not choose to have multiselves: light pink
Those that experience their selves as being "alter egos" for the main self: grey
Those that are at their core consciousness, experiencing selves that are all equally them: white
Those that have fluid selves, in any sense: lilac
Those that have static selves: light blue
Distinction from plurality: dark blue
This label was a reaction to segreID. At first glance the two terms seem very similar, but there are some key differences such as my far laxer approach to including those that identify with some form of plurality. This label is not meant to act as a recoin, nor is it meant to "out-inclusive" the segreID coiner, vampi-rq.
I wanted to create a less specific term that would include me, and anyone else that shared the majority of my experiences
While there is conflict between me and vampi-rq, I still have a lot of appreciation and respect their term and how it was intended to be used. The multiself label is personal to me, and it was born out of respect for the segreID definition rather than in spite of it. SegreID exists to describe a much more specific experience, and it's one that simply doesn't apply to me, which I'm fine with
All thumbs are fingers, but not all fingers are thumbs
While by definition segreID does happen to fall under the multiself umbrella, that does not mean that 100% of the things described here apply to it. Vampi-rq has been explicit about what is and is not segreID. I encourage you to do your research and pick the appropriate label for what you're experiencing. The multiself label is intentionally very vague and nonspecific
cis - identity someone bodily has and identifies with
trans - identity someone doesn't have bodily but identifies with
tris - identity between trans and cis or encompassing both of them
dia - old name for trans
muto - someone who is cis but identifies as trans
null - someone who bodily has some identity but doesn't identify as one
pan - every
perma - someone who feels like they always should have some identity
schrödinger - someone self diagnosed with identity but if proven wrong they will identify as trans severi - someone who identifies with less/more severe level of identity
iter - someone who should identify with trans label but for whatever reason doesn't
aestheti - someone who identifies with identity for aesthetic reasons
xeno - someone who's identity falls under xenoabled umbrella which describes unconventional relationship to disability label that isn't encompassed by exisiting labels
pxn - someone who is simultaneously all and none identity
Yayyy !! I'm so happy for youuu, Idk you but I'm happy for you !! ((o(^∇^)o))
Oh my god Charlie (penguinz0) read our superchats <3 I’m so happy I love him smmmmmm
fictional reliance disorder (FRD)
> when one is heavily impacted by or heavily reliant on works of fiction. this includes;
holding views or beliefs that are mainly present in fiction/mainly based in fiction.
having unrealistic expectations of certain experiences.
relying heavily on works of fiction to function or prefering to interact with fiction over reality.
experiencing confusion or upsetness when something turns out different from the media they consume.
maladaptive daydreaming, if not daydreaming is still prevelant.
have an interest in creative arts such as drawing or writing.
If a groomer uses proship content to groom someone, it is not proshippers fault. It is the groomers fault. Proshippers are not groomers, but some groomers are proship and use content to groom people. That does not mean the content shouldn't be made or shared. Groomers shouldn't exist, and most proshippers hate them, but we do not control other people's actions.
Sincerest apologies if you were groomed by a proshipper. But that does not mean all proshippers are groomers.
Katze
Reblog if u promote problematic pedophilic and incestuous relationships /silly
Stop being so cute gosh darn it