for the ask game, đđđ¤đĄď¸ !!!
I started writing this and realized that my quest/story arc answer could also work for the sibling dynamic one and vice versa, so the first two are both for both.
Iâm very fond of The Story of the Crop-Eared Dogâwhich is to Arthurian lit what Lilly Onakuramara is to the Barden Bellas, only less importantâand its weird anticlimax in which the sidekick shows up and reveals that heâs achieved their key goals by killing a vast number of people, including all of the naked monks on the Island of Naked Monks, then defeating but sparing the main antagonist. (The antagonistâthe Knight of the Lantern, henceforth known as Lannyâis Alastrannâsâthe sidekickâsâyounger half-brother. Alastrannâs earlier speeches concerning Lanny can be briefly summarized as, âMy baby brother is sooo talented and amazing, but he destroys everything he touches, so Iâm going to kill all his friends and steal his stuff and hope that solves the issue.â Somehow, this works). Thereâs a lot more to unpack there, but itâs a complicated mess. A charming complicated mess.
Arthurâs sudden ascent to greatness, and the barriers that likely creates between the (formerly unwitting) foster brothers, has its own sort of pathos, but their dynamic in Cullwch and Olwen is heartbreaking and seems to get overlooked. (They arenât referred to as brothers or foster brothers there, but Iâll count it anyway). They have a falling out over an extemporaneous song with which Arthur ridicules Caiâs tactics on a specific killing errand. It might be meant as a joke, but it angers Cai so much that he leaves, never to return or aid Arthur again. The twist is this: itâs already been said that when Cai is killed, Arthur avenges him by killing not only his killer but also his killerâs brothers. Arthurâs vengeance is brutal and unfair and a mark of extreme grief; clearly, he never stopped caring about his friend/brother, even though he was never able to make up with him in life.Â
Your Most Specific Nitpick About Your Fave (anything from "Gareth would not have a beard" to "this is basically a different guy"):
One of my faves is Dinadan, and an adaptational/fandom nitpick of mine is when he gets shipped with random people. I personally headcanon him as aroace. There are some texts where I can understand reading him as being gay and having feelings for Tristan, but writing about, say, him and Mordred makes no sense to me and I find it aggravating. Aroaces (and aspec people in general) have such little representation as it is.
Who Are You Betting On In This Month's Tournament?
Assuming that Lanny is out of town, Iâll place a small bet on Dinadan. He doesnât win often, so I could get great odds for him, and when he does win, itâs very funny. I also really like Dinadan.
Shana Tova everyone, and a happy holiday to all who celebrate! May this year be peaceful and fulfilling :)
Those are fabulous. Iâll add an old and terrible meta-theory and expand on it to apply it to Grimwald:
The whole series was a dream Billy Raven had or took place in his imagination as a way of coping with his terrible circumstances. Lord Grimwald symbolized Harold Bloor. He was never a real person, or, if he was, he only visited Bloorâs once.
I am a truther for a lot of things, but my biggest truth is that Dagbert is agender. Why? If Lord Grimwald had no first son, then Lysander could kill him all day every day no problem. He/They Dagbert who doesn't identify as a man or son or boy but actually just doesn't care
Wait a minute...
Edward the Third was an Arthuriana nerd who named his son after Sir Lionel, and...
...made up a title for him, which....
...had previously existed in Arthuriana and didn't refer to a place. Coincidence?
Probably.
Well, darn. That would've been very interesting. Then again, maybe the knowledge that Edward III was such a nerd he named his son after Sir Lionel is enough to ask.
They call me "little man," "King Arthur's fool,"
And "simpleton," those lackeys at the court,
But this fool's mother had the Second Sight,
And sometimes when I caper for the king
I see more than Taliesin the bard
And Merlin the enchanter can, combined.
I stand before the dais, juggling:
The red balls first, then yellow, green and blue,
And when I add the gold and silver spheres,
The oval blur between my hands takes form.
A glowing, rainbow mirrow it becomes
Through which I see the king an older man.
His beard is shot with grey. Astride his horse
He sits up straighter than he would on land
When all the kingdom's cares, some awful guilt,
And the death of all his dreams lie on his back.
I see two rows of soldiers and a snake,
A sword unsheathed to kill it, turned on him--
I drop the balls and stammer out some jest,
A wish for pardon, while the courtiers roar.
He does not laugh. He sees my face go grey
With terror. Arthur thinks I fear his wrath.
He hands me the gold ball, rolled to his feet,
Says, "Dagonet, all people make mistakes."
He glances at his wife; she looks away.
Fool I may be, but even I can tell
There's something wrong when Guinevere looks down
Among the milling courtiers at one knight,
The tallest, bravest, handsomest in spurs:
At Lancelot, who never makes mistakes.
I scramble for the balls. He looks at me,
Then looks away, and shrugs his lion's mane.
Dismiss me as a fool, Sir Lancelot.
Better a fool in small things all my life
Than a great lord who, with one folly alone,
Casts all he loves to ruin at life's end.
At this point, my categorized Arthurian theme song list has spiraled entirely beyond reasonable proportions. If itâs taught me anything, itâs that at least two thirds of Imagine Dragonsâ songs seem like they could be about Mordred.
If we go down,
then
we go down
together
Song lyric from "Paris" by the Chainsmokers; paintings by Herbert Draper, John Duncan, John William Waterhouse, N.C. Wyeth, Sidney Meteyard, Edmund Leighton, Rogelio de Egusquiza, N.C. Wyeth, August SpieĂ, Harry R. Mileham, August SpieĂ
ANTISEMITIC BIASÂ
Many antisemites donât consciously dislike Jews. They might even think highly of Jews. For example, they might believe âpositiveâ stereotypes of Jews, such as that Jews are good at business or good with money. They might have Jewish friends. They might like âsomeâ Jews. But they still cause tremendous damage to the Jewish community.Â
âBiasesâ can be defined as âan inclination or prejudice for or against one person or group.â
Unconscious biases are known as implicit biases. We all have implicit biases (whether negative or positive) in the way that we interpret the world around us. Conscious biases (such as, for example, the Nazis outwardly believing that Jews were âthe inferior raceâ) are known as explicit biases.
Because antisemitism is everywhere in our world â in our cultures, our languages, our folklore, our literature, our entertainment, our media, and more â itâs impossible for us not to internalize at least some antisemitic biases. These biases, however, exist on a spectrum: from unconsciously assuming that most Jews are wealthy (implicit bias) to believing the white supremacist conspiracy theory that Jews are enacting a âwhite genocideâ (explicit bias) to everything in between.
Because antisemitism is so old and so deeply embedded into our society and institutions (e.g. religion, language, literature, education, and more), that means that there is a lot of antisemitic bias in our world, most of which you might not even be able to see. But that doesnât mean it doesnât exist.Â
ANTISEMITISM IS A CONSPIRACY ABOUT THE JEWS
Antisemitism can be tricky to spot because it works very differently than every other form of bigotry. While other bigotries see their victims as âinferior,â antisemitism sees Jews as both âinferiorâ but also âsuperiorâ or all-powerful, capable of causing every calamity from wars to natural disasters to diseases to controlling the weather.Â
Societies project whatever they dislike most onto the Jews. In the Middle Ages, Jews were Christ-killers. In Nazi Germany and McCarthyist America, Jews were communists. In the Soviet Union, Jews were capitalists. In Nazi Germany and during the rise of the scientific racism period, Jews were the inferior race. To white supremacists, Jews are not white. To left-wing anti-Zionists, Jews are white. For centuries in Europe, Jews were untrustworthy foreigners from Palestine. But today among anti-Zionists, Jews are Europeans colonizing Palestine. We are whatever makes us the perfect scapegoat at any given time.Â
Itâs no coincidence, then, that antisemitism tends to surge most when societies are in upheaval. After all, the leaders need someone to blame. Examples of this include the Germansâ blaming Jews for Germanyâs suffering post-World War I, as well as the rise of the âDeadly Exchangeâ conspiracy which blames Israel for police brutality in the United States, following George Floydâs murder.Â
Antisemitism moves through conspiracy theories. Most notably, since to the antisemite, Jews are all-powerful, the most prevalent and deeply ingrained antisemitic conspiracies have to do with Jews and wealth and power. In the Middle Ages, for example, Europeans believed that Jews aimed to subvert Christendom. Since the 1920s, antisemitic leaders in the Arab world have rallied their followers behind the conspiracy that Jews intend to destroy Al-Aqsa Mosque and usurp Islamic lands. White supremacists â and far left anti-Zionists â today believe the âZionist Occupied Governmentâ conspiracy, which accuses Jews of controlling and manipulating the American government for their benefit.Â
Given the pervasiveness of conspiracies regarding Jews and power, antisemitism is nearly impossible to address without triggering more antisemitism. If an antisemite faces consequences for their actions, antisemites will use this as âproofâ that itâs the all-powerful Jews that have imposed these consequences. This makes antisemitism a self-fulfilling prophecy.Â
BIGOTRY WON'T ALWAYS BE OBVIOUS TO YOU
Most of us want to do the right thing. The problem is that bigotry â whether antisemitism or something else â doesnât come with a flashing neon sign that says âthis is bigoted! Call it out!â Instead, bigotry persists because entire societies convince themselves that their bigoted worldview is somehow justified. This is especially true of antisemitism. Antisemites throughout history have long persecuted Jews under the guise of seeking justice.Â
For instance, since the Middle Ages, Jews have been periodically persecuted on the accusation that they killed a Christian or Muslim child for ritual purposes. In other words, antisemites were seeking âjusticeâ for these children that the Jews allegedly killed. This antisemitic trope is called âblood libelâ and has led to the deaths of millions of Jews. Itâs safe to say that these murderous antisemites fully believed that they were doing the âright thing.â Some examples of historic blood libels that have resulted in violence against Jews include the William of Norwich blood libel (1144), the Damascus Affair (1840), and the Kielce Pogrom (1946).Â
During the Bubonic Plague, Jews were persecuted under the false accusation that they were âpoisoning the wellsâ and sickening the gentile population of Europe. Once again, the persecution of Jews was seen as just.
During the Nuremberg Trials, high-ranking Nazi officers testified that they believed that Jews were a danger to the safety of the German people and the German nation. In other words, they justified their mass extermination of Jew under the guise of âprotectingâ the people of Germany.Â
The list goes on and on. Is it possible that today you too have been made to believe that violence against Jews â Zionists, Israelis â is a just cause?Â
THE NAZI FALLACY
A few years ago, the notorious antisemite Shaun King argued with a Holocaust survivor on Twitter. When accused of antisemitism, he retorted, âI canât be an antisemite. I fight Nazis every day!â But anyone even remotely familiar with antisemitism or Jewish history will know that Nazis were far from the Jewsâ only historic oppressors. You donât have to be a Nazi to be an antisemite. In fact, most antisemites are not Nazis.Not even close.Â
Nazism is just one manifestation of antisemitism. Itâs a deadly one, certainly, but itâs also far from the only deadly manifestation of antisemitism. Jews have been killed by the thousands â sometimes by the millions â by a multitude of other oppressors. Some, like the Nazis, the KKK, and other white supremacists, are far-right. Others, like the Soviet Union, are far-left. Others are somewhere in the middle, and others oppressed us so long ago that their ideologies long predate the left-right political spectrum as we know it today.
The horrific images of Nazism and the death camps are seared in the worldâs collective memory. Itâs easy to think that if it doesnât look like Nazism, if it doesnât look like Auschwitz, then itâs not actually antisemitism, or perhaps it could be antisemitism, but itâs not serious antisemitism. In reality, though, antisemitism doesnât go from zero to Auschwitz. Instead, antisemitic tropes, conspiracies, and stereotypes fester and proliferate, operating under new euphemisms and adapting to whatever society theyâre in. Many of the same antisemitic conspiracies that drove the Nazis nearly 100 years ago are the exact same conspiracies that are driving âprotestorsâ to violently harass Jews in the streets of New York City today.Â
For many years before the gas chambers, antisemitism in Germany, which once was home to the most assimilated, well-integrated Jewish community in the Diaspora, proliferated in university lecture halls, justified and explained away in academic language. It wasnât deadly yet, but it soon would be. When you dismiss any sort of antisemitic rhetoric because it doesnât mirror the deadliest days of the Nazi regime, what you are actually doing is that you are contributing to the sort of hostile, conspiratorial environment that eventually made the Holocaust possible in the first place.Â
THE GASLIGHTING
Antisemitism and the gaslighting of Jews go hand in hand. If an antisemite faces consequences for their antisemitism, it simply reinforces their antisemitic beliefs. Because antisemitism always places Jews in the role of oppressor, itâs nearly impossible for Jews to seek accountability or justice without being accused of exaggerating, crying wolf, playing the victim, or otherwise having nefarious intentions.Â
After the Holocaust, for example, the second in command at the Red Cross, Carl Jacob Burckhardt, decried the Nuremberg Trials, calling them âJewish revenge.â Others, like the Palestinian newspaper Falastin, did so as well.Â
Antisemitic bias oftentimes makes it impossible for some people to see Jews as victims. If an antisemite loses their job for espousing antisemitism, they will then blame the âpowerfulâ Jews â or Zionists, or another euphemism â for taking their job. In that way, they turn the victim into the victimizer. This is a classic gaslighting tactic, which creates a catch-22 and is one of the reasons antisemitism can be so hard to combat.Â
For example, in the lead up to the Holocaust, American isolationists of various political persuasions accused Jews sounding the alarm on the treatment of Jews in Nazi Germany of trying to instigate a war with the Germans.Â
Sometimes we are even accused of provoking or exaggerating antisemitism for our own benefit. There are a number of conspiracies, for example, that the Zionists worked with the Nazis to instigate the Holocaust to justify the creation of a Jewish state.Â
An example of the accusation that Jews play the victim is when we are told that we talk about the Holocaust âtoo muchâ â contrary to the statistics that demonstrate people are woefully misinformed about the Holocaust â or that we should move on because we âgot reparationsâ (not exactly true, but thatâs a different topic).Â
Then there are the accusations that we brought antisemitism or antisemitic violence onto ourselves â something that weâve seen on a grand scale following the Hamas massacre on October 7.Â
WHAT YOU CAN DO
(1) Listen to Jews. I donât mean just listen to your Jewish friends, or to the Jews you personally agree with. I mean listen to the Jewish community as a whole. Jews donât often agree on much, but at the end of the day, we are a community, and only the Jewish community can fully describe our own experience.Â
Donât listen just to the Jews who validate your views. Listen to the Jews that challenge you. Donât shut yourself off from learning because it might contradict whatever ideology you follow. Learning is a lifelong process. I promise you you donât know everything there is to know about antisemitism (I donât either! Iâm always learning). But itâs your responsibility to open yourself up to new information so that you can do better.Â
(2) if Jews are telling you something is antisemitic, then your first instinct should never be to distrust us.Can Jews weaponize accusations of antisemitism? Sure. Anyone can weaponize anything. Is it likely that thatâs whatâs happening? No. Antisemitism worldwide has skyrocketed to the highest levels since the end of the Holocaust. Itâs a very real threat taking lives. You should take accusations of antisemitism just as seriously as you take accusations of other bigotriesâŚeven if initially you donât see it.Â
(3) I canât stress this enough: do your best to educate yourself about antisemitic conspiracies, stereotypes, and tropes throughout history. The euphemisms may change â sometimes weâre âglobalists,â other times weâre âZionistsâ â but the formula remains the same. To be able to spot antisemitism, you have to learn to spot it. I recommend reading my post âThe Worldâs Oldest Hatredâ for more.Â
This is what happens when you mash together a revenge quest, a slasher movie, a buddy road trip, a bildungsroman, a fantasy epic, and a shaggy dog story and set it in medieval times. Because there arenât many Irish Arthurian texts, whether Bhalbhuaidh, the protagonist, is meant to be Gawain or Galahad is controversial. His name and titles could point to either and his life situation seems more like Gawainâs, but I will refer to him Galahad because I find the idea of a Galahad AU where heâs pagan and gallivants around with a prince who was turned into a giant dog and lost all qualms about murder along the way entertaining. It starts when Arthur, who inexplicably holds the title of King of the World, convenes a hunt in the Dangerous Forest on the Plain of Wonders and the mysterious Knight of the Lantern does what any antagonistic knight worth his salt would do: gatecrash and ask for violence. It gets less normal very rapidly from there. Abhlach the druidess is at least as awesome as she is wicked, Galahad may or may not have a magical music-making sword, and the fact that thereâs an Island of Naked Monks is never given any explanation because itâs only mentioned in passing when the dog tells Galahad he killed them all.Â
Yeah, itâs a fun read.
Hereâs a link to the translation I read:
#SOMEONE PLEASE DROP THE SOURCE FOR THE HECTOR ONE THAT SOUNDS AWESOME
@sanddef
It's from Cantare di Astore e Morgana (the Cantare of Hector and Morgan).
Hereâs a link to a translation originally posted by lazerbem on Reddit, courtesy of Redpanda from the Arthurian Theater Discord server:
Arthur was killed by a giant cat.Â
Arthur killed the cat.
Arthur didnât fight the cat. Kay did.
Kay and Bedivere use salmon as taxis.Â
Lucan is half giant, half lion. (This Lucan, Lucano in the original Italian, is evil and not related to Bedivere).Â
King Arthur raided the land of the dead.
The human knight Caradoc Briefbras has three half siblings: a dog, a horse, and a pig.
A large portion of Arthurâs troops was killed a while before Camlann by his nephewâs attack ravens in self-defense. Arthur and said nephew were playing chess at the time and neither did much to stop it.
Merlin retired peacefully and went to live in the countryside with Taliesin.
Wherever Arthur walks, plants die. They donât grow back for years.
Arthur had a spunky (half?) brother who died in battle after making a mysterious oath.
Dagonet is more or less able to run the kingdom when Arthur is gone. His biggest error is overspending on mercenaries.
Guinevere has an evil almost identical twin half-sister.
Hector beat up all the best knights except for Galahad while possessed by a demon.
Gawain plays tennis.
Gawain has used a chessboard as a weapon.
Near the start of his reign, Arthur left Lot in charge of the kingdom and went on a quest with a sassy parrot.
Gawain or Galahad succeeded Arthur as king.Â
In which I ramble about poetry, Arthuriana, aroace stuff, etc. In theory. In practice, it's almost all Arthuriana.
215 posts