Just liking what i see or care about 😖 (This account is dark and full of terrors)
128 posts
The director of the first episode also worked in the adaptation of the anime aku no hana. Whether you liked it or not, his work with rotoscoping was pretty good in my opinion and it fitted uzumaki. Now though, we are stuck with crappy 3d models that lack any of the detail or smoothness of the first episode.
So, unlike episode 1 they crammed like 5 chapters into one episode in a way that there was no time to build for any of them nor time to breathe.
And from the looks of it the animation and direction got screwed so badly because it is a different studio and director from the first episode.
I guess all those years of delays had to catch up with the series at some point...
The worst part is that they think that by doing this it will make her a "deeper character". Sorry no, it does the opposite, it takes away from her agency, from the trauma she expirienced and how she had to adapt to that kind of society and become an enforcer of said system. Now it's just "good" or "bad".
"History will paint you a villain"
Fourth wall breaking to make us believe what they're putting in Rhaenyra's mouth.
Alicent went to Rhaenyra's wedding wearing the colors her House use for war, which created the Green and Black teams. She knew what she was doing.
Alicent was the only one who actively hated Rhaenyra's children to be bastards. Corlys and Rhaenys didn't really care, Rhaenyra's own husband didn't care, Viserys was totally happily in denial. Cole hated it, but his opinion doesn't matter.
Alicent made it a big deal, raised Aegon to be scared of Rhaenyra when he had no true animosity towards his sister before. And telling her son to spare Rhaenyra after years of telling him he was a challenge for her and would die if she becomes queen, was silly.
She helped put Aegon on the throne, and when learnt she was wrong to do so, started to show disdain for him that led Aegon to take his dragon to battle and get burnt.
Then, at his weakest state, she accepted Rhaenyra's deal that includes the murder of her son. The very son who did not want to be king in the first place. Just so she could run away with Helaena and her daughter. She is literally fleeing what she helped causing. She could protect Helaena and Jaehaera and stay in KL to be by her sons' sides and accepts the same sentence she put on them. But no, she still wants a way out of this mess.
So, the writers telling us, through Rhaenyra of all people, "Alicent is a only a victim of patriarchy and will be paint as a villain" is so stupid. Yes, she is a victim. But it doesn't justify all she did. In season two, she marvels at how messed up her boys are, when all their life they heard her complain about Rhaenyra and her bastard children, how Aemond lost an eye and how Lucaerys should have lost his too, that Rhaenyra will murder Aegon in cold blood when she becomes queen (before he usurped her).
So, yes, she is a villain and history will rightfully paint her as such. That doesn't make her a bad character, nor does it mean all victims become villains in turn; Rhaenys is a victim of patriarchy too, Rhaenyra and her mum, the servant girl who Aegon sexually assaulted, all the women of the story are victims of that.
Do they think think that "strong female characters"="good people"?
- Rhaenys is an oracle of wisdom that only wishes for peace. Heleana doesn't have a taste for dragon riding or anything really, she's just there to have visions. Alicent is left behind and ignored... so she goes and talks with the enemy? And apparently Rhaenyra's ending in s1 and luke's murder meant nothing for her outside of 2 episodes? Are they scared of showing a woman acting out based on her emotions? I feel like anyone would be overwhelmed if a family member (not even a child necessarily) ended up being killed by the opposing side.
I feel like these people would instantaneously combust if you presented them with characters like Cersei or Catelyn, even Sansa.
No matter how good your actors are, they can only do so much if the script you are giving them is nonsensical. You can have characters who are conflicted and make wrong choices based on their situation. But Alicent giving up Aegon like that, as if her getting in front of Meleys to protect her family wasn't a pivotal point for her in showing her choice to Rhaenys last season? Rhaenyra too shouldn't have even given Alicent the time of day when she already tried and did basically the same as her but got told it was "too late" and an invasion of King's Landing is inevitable at this point. I know they shared a relationship together and do think that even if it was long ago, it still can determine how they interact with each other, but even that being the case, sometimes you need to prioritize some things over others. I don't doubt that Alicent cared about Rhaenyra, but that didn't stop her from advancing her own interests with her family. I don't doubt that Rhaenyra cared about Alicent, but she still put herself and her family first by leaving King's Landing and pretty much never visiting again, even when her father was there wasting away. That's what makes them interesting. The conflict within themselves and choosing one thing over the other. That even if it hurts, some things just turn sour.
Not even mentioning that since it's obvious that Rhaenyra will take the city, this whole interaction could have happened then and with bigger stakes, like Alicent begging for her life and Rhaenyra having to make the choice of whether she dies or is imprisoned or something.
This whole scene gives me the impression that they wanted a dramatic and emotional scene for the end of the season so they came up with this.
Yeah because THAT'S why people are talking abot them and celebrating the blockade, for sure, so sad that you can't cherry pick when literally no one is going to do anything to help and they are dying by the thousands during a genocide. Nice deflection though, go out and pick your perfect white saviour
The houthis are just one of many factions fighting for control of yemen as, essentially, the yemeni version of the taliban (which of course includes child brides and sex slaves) but their thinly veiled feudalist salivating over the prospect of controlling the red sea gets interpreted as righteous resistance simply because they declared israel their enemy, thus proving once and for all that the evilest fuckers can totally rewrite their image with more than a few people as long as they whip out a “but israel”
Not the only ones, here in Chile exist the biggest community of palestinians outside the middle east, the majority of them escaped when at the end of the XIX century had to leave since they were being pushed to fight for the ottoman empire, the majority of them where christians. Palestinians no matter when or what their background is HAVE ALWAYS BEEN FORCED TO ESCAPE NO MATTER THE TIME PERIOD.
This weekend about 2 billion people will celebrate Christmas across the world, and the birth of their religion in Palestine. Today the only remaining 700 Christians, the descendants of the first followers of Christ, are being wiped out in Gaza and their churches bombed to pieces. [@/ Hanine09 on X. 12/23/23.]
Haunting Landscape Photography Inspired by the Brothers Grimm Fairytales by Kilian Schönberger
German photographer Kilian Schönberger is deeply inspired by the exquisite and gruesome Brothers Grimm’s fairytales. Stunning and haunting, the images are brooding, atmospheric, which instantly transport you to a fantasy world, where the woods seem spookier, darker and far more enchanting than on Earth. Although Schönberger is colorblind, he understands that the composition and geometry of an image convey its mood and beauty.