You Can Recognize Yourself Through The Fictional Character. But Watch Out

I may have just made my life's work

I came back from my finals with my personal head canon of king candy

Since I head canon that there was an original king candy before turbo took over, I decided to draw the difference between the two. The original KC was much more saturated, jolly, had sparkles to represent sugar (since me and my friend head canon that he presents more than one candy like peppermint, sugar cubes, fruit leather, butterscotch, etc) and had vanellope as his daughter. I would also think his role in sugar rush would be an assistant, helper or a guide to the player. Turbo as KC would be more desaturated at least in looks and his eyes were noticeably sunken compared to the original (basically how he was in the first movie). What they have in common is their ability to serve cunt

the beautiful bride and her ugly ass groom

Rushed the hell out of this one ngl

6x11: when a reductive gay joke plotline is still queer-coded (or more metatextual queerness in house md)

in its later seasons, house md keeps doing this really funny thing where they play into house and wilson with increasingly low-hanging fruit gay jokes (dw i still laugh lol). but they manage this without sacrificing the 6 seasons' worth of cultivated subtext that permits genuine queer coding above queerbait/2000s gay jokes/etc. 6x11 is one of the best examples of this so far.

so i'm not a musical junkie, and i'm sure this has already been written about to hell and back, but 6x11 prompted me to look more into the song that wilson was singing at the end of the episode.

"one" from the musical a chorus line (also the poster house bought):

"One singular sensation Every little step she takes One thrilling combination Every move that she makes One smile and suddenly nobody else will do You know you'll never be lonely with you-know-who!"

according to genius lyrics, "Despite the lyrics which praise a singular star, the star at whom it’s directed is never shown. The “One” is absent...The star is not even named – only referred to as ‘she’ or ‘You Know Who.’"

there is a "one" in 6x11 - nora, whom both house and wilson stake their claims for dating (which is exceptionally gross & misogynistic of them). but the song/musical choice implies that she was never important enough to be The One in question.

this frame seems self-aware of the potential absence of "The One." the shot gives the impression of symmetry, but it's very uneven. house is reclined back, warping the straight line of the couch, and the boxes on wilson's side are neat and tidied, whereas those on house's side are sparse and thrown about. more importantly, there's that arm rest between house and wilson's seats. if The One (nora) was to sit anywhere, this frame seems to imply that it would be there.

thus, this frame isn't straight.

house seems to be aware of this pseudo-absence, as well. he looks at wilson with a thoughtful, revelatory look on his face:

superficially, he's probably just astounded that wilson is singing the song from a musical he hates so much, but he lets the song continue, nonetheless. here, the episode remembers the genre of the song that wilson is singing - a showtune! and what happens in showtunes/musicals? the singers are spot-lit! the audience watches them perform!

here i'm gonna posit that wilson is a (non-self aware) paul, a chorus line's man character whose revelation that he's gay is both tragic but also drives the plot. house can see this. meta-textually, we see this THROUGH house seeing this.

taken together, this scene's asymmetry, implied spotlight, and awkward arm rest divide offer wilson as the performer in this musical-adjacent exchange, with house as the in-text audience, and us, the real audience, as the outer-textual audience. what a long winded way of saying that wilson is performing comphet here!

and there's another note i want to make on the subject of performance/performativity...

this is from the golden globes official article, "'A Chorus Line' Brought Visibility to Queer Stories in the 70s and 80s'":

"The audience gets to see [Paul, the main character's] valor, which may be an inspiration to those in the audience who face similar challenges."

wilson's proposal to house is complete performance. the entire precedent for the scene is just gay joke after gay joke and wilson's anxiety that this false impression of him will negatively impact his dating life.

when he makes this performance of homosexuality, he's lauded for it. the restaurant urges house to say yes, and everybody claps even before house has given an answer.

also from the article: " The character of Paul delivers a touching monologue about how performing revealed his identity as a gay man."

6x11 inverts this dynamic. the performance in question is that of homosexuality, and wilson is not rewarded for it in the end. he loses The One, as does house, and they go home and watch a hockey game together in yet another intricate ritual (as stated above).

i also think there's something to be said about house enlisting nora's help in bringing the poster for a chorus line up to his apartment.

i'm genuinely hesitant to applaud this show - or any show, really - for subtextual intentionality like this. i have a hard time believing that there was, long ago, a time where tv didn't just capitalize off fandom's tendency to pair up its characters in our internet fanbase/fanfiction age but deliberately queer-coded things. but even silly episodes like this one remind me of that one robert sean leonard quote about house and wilson, that they are the only relationship in the show based completely on choice - the choice to always come back to each other.

all that is to say that i sincerely think these 2 are written in a subversion of gender norms and binary platonic/romantic relationships. for 2000s tv, that's just like lightning in a bottle.

oh and apparently there's a gay character named greg in the musical, too. someone who's more qualified to talk about a chorus line should hijack this post. what the hell are we doing, david shore.

Hey quartz, why this era again? Why are we so back?

GUYS ALWAYS SELL YOUR SOOUL TO AZUL ASHENGROTO

my apology for the depressing yaoi

I really hate the healthcare system

why is FND still called conversion disorder. I was told by my therapist that I should see my PCP about conversion disorder which could be causing my inability to speak. When I googled "conversion disorder" all of the articles using that name were from like 2020 and before. All the recent articles said FND, and I was like "wtf does FND have to do with conversion disorder" so I googled "is FND a conversion disorder" and I got no clear answer.

I had to go onto discord and ask "hey does anyone know if FND is conversion disorder" and YES IT IS??

Also apparently the whole "mental issues converting into physical aliments" isn't even believed anymore, like FND can just happen.

Anyway I'm still waiting for an appointment with an SLP, the next available neurologist appointment is in October 2025, and my school says they can't give me any actual accommodations if I don't have a diagnosis, which is BULLSHIT because it took me over a year to be diagnosed with chronic pain and yet they still gave me accommodations in school.

I HATE THE HEALTHCARE SYSTEM

Redrew the Jon hair timeline

YES