This just reaffirms unto me that my little pony is actually a deeply rooted narrative about the nature of class systems, wherein it follows a character who, perchance, was born in the right environment to have royal ties, higher education than the average noble class because of this and, when having displayed themselves to be a potential threat with the skillset they have they become indoctrinated into the royal family. This mind you, was easily done by the royal family requesting they keep a daily report happening as they are tasked with observing the daily lives of the middle and lower class citizens.
Mlp is very clearly a deeply thought out warning to society about how easily one can be swayed into another person's goals and ambitions while fully believing that this is what they too wish to have.
my little pony is problematic because it promotes a positive view of monarchy and subtly suggests the inferiority of earth ponies, none of which are represented in the royal family. also notice how equestria's monarchs call themselves princesses rather than queens, projecting a false image of innocence to their subjects. they should have unionized and sent celestia to the glue factory
~ cutie marx
Yess
me: existing doing nothing
my brain: emotions time babeyyyyyyy
me: I have absolutely no idea what this emotion is, guess I’ll just distract myself till it goes away
my brain: fucking asshole don’t ignore me!!!!!!!!!
Just about cried during a maths test because I completely blanked on the question about the one thing I spent an hour studying just so I could understand it.
Life is hell
the first five emotes on your recently used emojis describe you as a person ready set go
i think if you don’t have sensory difficulties, it’s easier to diminish them as a matter of “preference.” but they are not.
when i, an autistic person, say “I cannot handle bell pepper,” I don’t mean “I would rather avoid it.” i mean actively, if all the food offered to me for six days straight contained bell peppers, i would starve. there is nothing on this entire planet that would make me eat them, because i can not handle them. and so by extension, when another autistic person only has four-or-five meals that they will eat, removing one of these meals will not allow for a substitute to occur. it’ll be one meal less they’re eating. and these same foods can be brand-specific. even if you, as a person without sensitivities, can’t tell a sensory difference, it is possible for people with these differences to be able to. there’s a whole disorder named after this. (avoidant restrictive food intake disorder.)
this isn’t a die-hard rule. some of us have extreme sensitivities and are brand specific. some of us do not. some of us can tolerate it. some of us cannot. but do not get upset at autistic people who point out something such as “it is very possible for us to only want to eat that one specific type of Kraft Mac and Cheese and abandoning that would starve us.”
(OK to reblog!)
reblog to give the person you reblogged this from a fucking break
See, this was an excellent line in the story, but it's not until now that i realize the funny nature of quotes sometimes
TECHNOLOGY