I will be honest guys, the Red portrait of king Charles is gorgeous asdfghjkl
it's a bad portrait. Like. Objectively. It does the opposite of what's intended. It looks like the painter is insulting him. If it was in a contemporary gallery with no context you would see it immediately as the ambivalent criticism of Charles's reign, how he fades into the overwhelming red background as a tiny little figure, small and insignificant, insufficient for the clothes he's wearing. It reminds my of Goya's portraits, how they were so 'realistic' that they ended up making these great figures look pathetic to the viewer. So these are our rulers?
the sheer novelty. the surprise and shock, the kinda cunt it's serving for no reason. I. I love it. It's an incredible portrait by Jonathan Yeo. By the sheer fact that Charles, the man, is impossible to portray as greater than man because he's just such a nothingburger of a dude. So a portrait made to make him look huge and interesting made him be swallowed in red brushstrokes. The butterfly, that reminded me immediately of " we will all laugh at guilded butterflies", draws more attention than him. It looks like an omen. It looks like a warning in all this red. Something is not right here.
This is the best royal portrait ever 10/10
Thank you to everyone who got me to 100 likes!
fucking shit up for funsies, thank you random strangers
wait a fucking second.
did they seriously change the title of a 14 year old video????
oh my fuckin God.
Putting Mabel through that straight to bi to aromantic pipeline
GET BEHIND ME LADIES!!
love when theyβre depicted like this
Dean Winchester + Halo Imagery π πͺ½
maybe this time picking at Textures on my skin will lead to being silky smooth
I cannot begin to explain to you the disappointment I felt on finding out that βmatch my freakβ was a sexual thing and not a level of how insane you are with your friends
Something a friend found on Twitterβ¦