Um These Are So Gorgeous WHAT?!

girlboss.

betty affirmations. read each separately

moles are quite interesting, wouldn’t you say?

I drew a little goober named Goober!

literally so real

atoms are just mini solar systems. electrons orbiting around a nucleus the way the earth orbits the sun. the most important thing on the smallest scale follows the same patterns as one of the most important things on the gigantic scale. life is always reflecting itself.

Alright US mutuals, if you are interested in, morbidly fascinated by, or anxiously doomscrolling through AI news, including Stable Diffusion, Llama, ChatGPT or Dalle, you need to be aware of this.

The US Copyright Office has submitted a request for comment from the general public. Guidelines can be found on their site, but the gist of it is that they are taking citizen statements on what your views on AI are, and how the Copyright Office should address the admittedly thorny issues in rulings.

Be polite, be succinct, and be honest. They have a list of questions or suggestions, but in truth are looking to get as much data from the general public as possible. If you have links to papers or studies examining the economic impacts of AI, they want them. If you have anecdotal stories of losing commissions, they want them. If you have legal opinions, experience using these tools, or even a layman's perspective of how much human input is required for a piece of work to gain copyright, they want it.

The deadline is Oct 18th and can be submitted via the link in the article. While the regulatory apparatus of the US is largely under sway by corporate interests, this is still the actual, official time for you to directly tell the government what you think and what they should do. Comments can be submitted by individuals or on behalf of organizations. So if you are a small business, say a print shop, you can comment on behalf of the print shop as well.

Ars Technica

Thorny AI copyright questions have Copyright Office seeking public input

Should AI-created works be copyrighted? US regulators want to know what you think.

Big fan of characters realizing they don't get to die. They have to live. And grow. And be a person. And deal with shit they thought they'd never have to. And be fucked up about it. I would like more of this. Enough dying for honor or as redemption. It ain't. You're just a corpse. There is no moral value in dirt time.

This scene was giving hardcore YouTube apologist vibes like “abide by the guidelines”?! 🤔🤔🤔🤔 sounds rather familiar…

never realized this and omfg

thinking about how a marceline with no simon never grew her hair out... the possibility of marceline growing her hair out because she wanted to match simon, who was more like ice king than his actual self at that point, and then later cutting it to match with simon after he becomes himself again.

Here’s an OC I’ve been working on :D I haven’t come up with a name for them yet so if you have an idea please leave it in the comments!

YES. YES I CAN WATCH THEM

Can u watch them for me?

I need to go draw their apocalyptic version