“Why should rich people pay more” because fuck ‘em
“So you are okay for paying more when you have money” I am not excluded from ‘fuck ‘em’ when relevant
I think you should legally disclose if something is ai just like how you legally have to disclose if something is an ad
My cartoon for this week’s Guardian Books
An apparently unpopular opinion: disabled people can have and do their hobbies. They deserve to have fun. They deserve to live their lives.
Their inability to do some things (like work, for example) does not mean they should be judged for… idk hanging out with their friends or to going outside. After all, having interests outside of work is often essential to our mental and physical health OUTSIDE of our disability.
And also *you might want to sit down for this* disabled people know what’s disabling for them (unless they people-please or push through due to necessity or survival of some sort). Disabilities don’t have to be visible or persistent to be disabling.
So yeah - my declaration: if an activity you want to do feels good and you’re able to do it, then do it. REGARDLESS OF YOUR DISABILITY WITH OTHER THINGS.
Ok now do NYT columnists
Ecosocialist praxis
caring about things is cool being passionate is cool being earnest is cool being genuine is cool being compassionate is cool
"This story is a tragedy because it didn't have to end this way."
vs
"This story is a tragedy because it was always going to end this way."