Thought Dump Now That I've Watched Hazbin Hotel. (Major Spoilers)

   I watched the animated ‘The Mummy’ series so often as a kid, that I managed to quote the beginning monologue at the start of each episode almost 100% perfectly as soon as I heard it.

   I just saw that it was on Peacock and decided to watch it again for nostalgic reasons. Then as soon as the music kicked in, I managed to quote it along with the narrator almost word for word, lol.

   I’ve started taking suggestions for horror movies to watch, right?

   Well, I’ve so far been suggested The Boy, House of Wax, Texas chainsaw (The 2003 remake), and House of 1000 corpses. I’ve gotten through all except the last one, which I just started watching.

   ... I am 33 minutes in. Since five minutes in, I became painfully aware of why people keep saying Rob Zombie’s movies are weird as shit.

   For the first ten, I was asking myself if I really wanted to watch the rest. But y’know what? I am two-thirds of the way through, I might as well finish it.

   If you have any suggestions for movies, I’ll gladly take a look, lol.

Your daily reminder that I will never accept TR, IW and Loki show as canon not only because of retcon of the original storyline, but also because all of them completely ignored THIS:

Also: cryokinesis and levitating were unfortunately never shown on-screen, and the most of his powers were shown for a few seconds and usually is just made fun of in TR and LS.

(And he is literally a genius. Not only in magic but in ANY KIND OF TECHNOLOGY. And they just forgot about it)

~About Me~

Hello ladies, gentleman, and variations thereupon! Welcome to my page.

   I’m Fandomtrashfox, and welcome to my page. I’m an autistic guy who loves fandoms and writing. 

   I made this fandom blog some time ago and realized there aren’t many male ‘x reader’ stories, especially in relation to some of my more darling fandoms. So I figured I’d help change that!

   I’m an Autistic Manflux homoflexible dude with anxiety, ADHD, C-PTSD, and possibly OCD. (I say ‘possibly’ because I don’t have the money to get an official diagnosis for that one, but everything else is officially diagnosed, lol.)

   Feel free to look around and request a fic, imagine, headcanons, or whatever you like! My ask box is always open! :3

   Have a good day, night, or evening!

Requests are currently OPEN.

Rules/DNI:

X readers will only be done with characters who are 18+. We don’t do age-ups around here, that’s gross.

I don’t write for canon x canon or oc x canon. Reader insert stories are the only ships I’m willing to write.

DNI if: -You are/support p*dos/MAPs -You are/support Pr*shippers/C*mshippers -You do/support Doxxing/Harassment/Death threats -You are/support LGBT-phobes, Racists/Sexists, Ableists, Anti-semites. -You fetishize groups of people or support doing so. (Races, LGBT, etc.) -You ship/self-ship with real people or sexualize celebrities/real people. -You are/support Pro-life.

No incestuous themes. Ever. This includes: -Adopted/Step family members -Half-family members -Distant family members -Clones -Alternate reality family members/versions of the same character. (Fuck the Loki series.)

I will not do female readers. Gender neutral, NB, and male yes, but not female-aligned. Trans FTM readers are also a-okay, but will probably be post-transition unless the request is specified otherwise.

Female-aligned peeps DNI with the male reader fics. Please. 

I will be more than willing to do any gender of other character however, so feel free to request a male/GN/NB reader with a female character.

Not sure if I want to do smut, if I do, it’ll be given the mature filter.

AUs are allowed.

I’m willing to write polyamory.  I’m not confident in my ability to write open relationships, nor am I comfortable doing so. I have nothing against them, do you, but I’m personally not comfortable writing or depicting them. Sorry.

I might not do all requests, please don’t be upset if I don’t do yours

I WILL NOT write about real people. (Mcyt, Kpop stars, actors, etc.)

More rules may be added/subject to edits.

Fandoms I write for: -Marvel -DC -The Dragon prince -Doctor who (Doctor 9 - Doctor 11) -Mortal Kombat -BNHA/MHA -Slasher movies -Pokemon -MLP:FIM -Other (Ask if I can do a fandom you have in mind.) Anything that isn’t listed here you may ask about.

Content I make: -Headcanons -Imagines -Platonic or Romantic ‘X reader’ fics -Certain crossovers/crossover AUs -AU content (AU ideas, concepts, etc.)

Extra notes:    -Specifics are encouraged when requesting. It makes it easier to write the more detailed it is.    -Occasionally, I’ll post content that isn’t fandom-related. This content will have the ‘#not fandom’ tag.    -I have a few triggers, but I won’t place them here since people have harassed me with them in the past for having them out in the open. Simply put, please be advised that I may skip a request if it contains one of my triggers.    -I refuse to do anything about the MCU past phase 3. As far as I’m concerned, the MCU ended at End Game, at the furthest. (Moon Knight was good, don’t get me wrong, but everything else was/is trash. Especially the ‘Loki’ series, you can’t change my mind on this.)    -I refuse to do anything about Doctor Who during Doctors 12 and 13.

Using the novelization of movies as evidence for something in the movie itself is really stupid.

Mainly, I'm saying this because the writer of the novelization is often a different person, who is tasked with 'expanding' on the source in their own way. Sometimes given early versions of the script to work off of, which were already scrapped for one reason or another.

So, the writer of the novelization will have a different interpretation of the story/characters than the original writers, and the movie's ideas and entire point may end up getting muddled and overshadowed by the biases and perspective of the novelization's writer.

So, to me, novelizations of movies/tv shows are far more like remakes, not bonus scenes. It follows the same formula, but it's not the same. So it makes no sense to use them as evidence for something in the original movie, whether it be about character, plot, or worldbuilding.

Same with movie-tie in video games, etc. People don't use those as 'evidence' from what I've seen, but I've seen people use movie novelizations as evidence, and it bothers the hell out of me.

Idk, I just wanted to make this post, because I'm annoyed.

A comment from Cinema therapy’s video on ‘Loki’.

Transcript and extra notes below:

I...disagree with the idea of Loki being a narcissist.   

   Acting out the way he does isn't just a trait of narcissists but also of people with low self-esteem, (I should know, being someone who has acted in such a way myself in the past.) Loki was clearly constantly put down by others, disrespected by who he thought were his people, and generally considered 'lesser' to Thor for most of, if not all of his life for seemingly no reason at all. (He 'feels' he's in Thor's shadow because he blatantly is. There's clear favouritism not just from Odin, but from all of Asgard.)

   He never wanted the throne, nor did he actually want power or popularity, he just wanted someone to tell him that he was worthy, he wanted someone to tell him he was worth something and that he wasn't a monster like the other Jotuns were. (This is far clearer in the deleted scenes, where Loki hesitates to take the throne in the first Thor movie, and even looks to his mother, the only person who really seemed to love him, before taking it. As well as his clearly more lovable interactions with Thor before it was revealed that he was Jotun.)

   I mean, hell, he tried to commit suicide at the end of the first Thor movie when his father, whom he tried to get recognition from, and who was certainly the biggest issue with his self-esteem, rejected him yet again.

   I feel like this is most prominent when you take into account that he IS a Jotun, a being that he was raised to hate and fear. He believes he's a monster, and that coupled with his already problematic self-esteem just makes it apparent that he has the exact opposite problem that a narcissist has.   He does deeply care for other people as well. Frigga being the biggest example, in Dark world, he was heartbroken and devastated by her loss. (And the fact that the last thing he said to her was that she 'wasn't his mother' certainly didn't make it better.) Or in Infinity War, where he recognizes Thanos' plan to kill 'half' of everything, so, seeing as he's one of two brothers, gets Thanos to kill him so Thor will get out safely. Literally sacrificing himself for his brother, who he, on all accounts, shouldn't have cared enough to help there if he was a narcassist.

   The mind stone and the sceptre weren't mind controlling Loki, but it was messing with his head, as is seen in-universe as well as mentioned in interviews. This is seen where he stabs Thor, as he's clearly shaken by what he's just done, even if you can only see this reaction for a few moments. He also doesn't believe in what he's saying in Avengers when he's telling the people around him to kneel, that's why Phil claims that he lacks conviction: Because he really does, he's doing all of this because he's hurting, and the mind stone is manipulating him, he doesn't actually believe anything he's saying there.

   Before anyone brings it up as well: Ragnarok and the Loki TV show are pieces of MCU lore that should be taken with a grain of salt. Many things said in Ragnarok are inconsistent with the other movies (See Sif apparently having to prove that women can be warriors, yet, the Valkyries existed. Or the fact that apparently the Valkyries died before Thor's time but Thor always wanted to join them? Or the 'we were eight at the time' line, when Thor and Loki, being Asgardian/Jotun, age differently than humans, so by that point, would've actually been infants. The Loki show as well, Sylvie and the entire situation revolving around that comes with many character and story inconsistencies, such as magic seen not working in the TVA but apparently Sylvie can still use it in another episode.)

   Basically, from where I'm standing, this diagnosis doesn't seem to make any sense? It makes more sense to say that he's faking narcissism just so he can look strong and more in control, while on the inside continuing to feel unworthy and unlovable. Lashing out not because he's truly hateful, but because, as you've said in another video: 'Hurt people, hurt people.' (Again, something I have sadly been through.) I'd also like to point out, in this way, his mischief seems more like a cry for help. As many will point out, if someone is neglected enough in early life, they're likely to develop a mentality of 'any attention is good attention', which seems to be pretty in-line with a lot of 'mischief' he pulls.

   But hey, I'm not a therapist, and that's just my opinion.

Note: Narcissists aren’t inherently bad people. Don’t write them off as ‘evil’ or ‘monsters’. Not all of them are. Putting everyone in boxes like that for mental disabilities or neurodivergence is doing nothing but perpetuating harmful rhetoric and harming people.

...With that being said though, Loki ain’t it, chief.

Real talk though: Cinema therapy’s video on Loki is stupid as hell. ‘Loki genuinely believes he is superior’ is a direct quote, and as you can read from the above post, that statement is blatantly wrong on its own.

If I got anything wrong, feel free to mention so. I want to be sure I get as much correct as possible in this as not to miss anything or perpetuate any harmful stereotypes, I just went off of what was described in the video.

pokemon fans when they have to wait another year for the next big game with no major releases in-between

Blood and Honey 2 = FNAF movie

Watched both the FNAF movie and Blood and Honey 2, and you know what? ...I feel like these movies should've traded tones.

When you hear a 'Winnie the Pooh horror movie', I personally think 'Oh that's silly', so the tone of the FNAF movie would've probably been more appropriate. So, it's horror, but it's silly horror, like the modern IT movie (Chapter 1) with the weird nonsensical 'cleaning up the bathroom' scene. It also would've helped a lot of the goofier dialogue jokes they tried to make. (The whole 'Let's Bounce' thing, for instance.)

Meanwhile, FNAF is a horror franchise at it's core about children being lured away, murdered, then stuffed into suits where they rotted until they possessed them. ...That deserves a way, way more dark tone than we got in the FNAF movie imo.

Either way, I can confidently say that Blood and Honey 2 stole its plot from the FNAF movie, but despite that, I had more fun watching Blood and Honey 2 than I did watching the FNAF movie. The only parts I actually really had fun with the FNAF movie on were the cameos, tbh, which is definitely a bad sign. (Like another series I know, if the thing you enjoy about it is the references to the original source material, then it's not a good addition to the franchise.)

I know why FNAF is sillier, because the franchise for some reason is trying to appeal to kids, now, but still. You can make horror for kids that's kid-friendly while still being scary and interesting, guys, come on.

“why does that character have to be queer?”

why not?

“why does that character have to be trans?”

why not?

“why does that character have to be a poc?”

why not?

Autistic! Male reader + Soulmate AU imagine

Male reader is an autistic guy with a hyper-fixation on mythology.

He gets teased a bit about it as he grows up, but it doesn’t really bother him. That is until he turns 18, when the name of your soulmate is supposed to appear as a tattoo on your wrist. Sure enough, it says ‘Loki’.

When people find out about it, the teasing turns into bullying and making fun of him. With people especially insinuating that nobody in the ‘real world’ wants him, so he only has his mythical gods. Among other things.

Then the attack on New York happens. After things calm down, Male reader is chilling out in a coffee shop. In this coffee shop, he literally bumps into someone. A man with slicked black hair, green eyes, wearing a black suit. (A bit overly dressed for a coffee shop, but whatever.) 

Male reader apologizes to him but the man seems very eager to get away from him, almost like he’s trying to hide from someone. That is until he hears the male reader introduce himself.

“Oh, uh, my name is (Y/N) by the way.” The man freezes and looks back at him. His tune changes immediately and he offers the male reader to walk with him as he leaves the shop.

Sure enough, pretty soon they’re walking down the street, talking on and on about the male reader’s hyper-fixation: Specifically Norse myth. 

Slowly Loki gets more and more dumbfounded by what he’s hearing, immediately cringing particularly when he’s told of the story about how this mythical version turned into a mare and had a stallion’s children. 

Loki finally says something about it under his breath.

(Y/N): “What do you mean?” Loki: “Hmm?” (Y/N): “’I can’t believe how much midgardians got wrong about me.’ What do you mean by that?”

Then, it finally clicks. Once there’s nobody around, Loki shows himself in his green and golden glory. With a smirk, showing (Y/N)’s name on his wrist.

*Que internal fanboy screaming from male reader. With Loki chuckling about it in the background.*