Are There Any Works In The Post-apocalyptic Genre With Post-apocalyptic Librarians? People Who Worked

i haaaaaAAATE descriptions of older women in books like “looking at her face it was easy to imagine how beautiful she once was” and the woman is like. 60 years old. 60. so she’s got like, some wrinkles? and gray hair??? but otherwise doesnt look that much different than when she was “young” and she’s still probably beautiful like a description like that isn’t even EDGING on acceptable unless the character is in their 90s and barely resembles what they would have 70 years ago and even in that case fuck you??? they’ve got more important things to do and recollect than missing an allegedly hot body byee

Making a Plan

So, editing is eating my soul.  And by that I mean I’m so deep in the revisions process that getting my brain back to writing for this blog is proving quite difficult. But I’m making a plan.  Two posts a week!  (This totes counts as a whole post.) Even if it’s just to say, “Hey I’m alive! Also, still editing.” (It’ll be longer than that, promise.) Regular updates are back, baby! PS. Puck and I…

View On WordPress

Writing from Scratch #8

Now that we have gone over the four simple plot-problems (1, 2, 3, 4) and how they are solved through try-fail cycles, we’ll take a look at how to make complex, compound, and compound-complex plots through the same devices as sentence creation.

The first way we’ll try complicating a plot is by making the solution of the first noted plot-problem dependent on the solution of a second plot-problem, which stands in for easy solution prevention. We’re typically going to use dependent plots to strengthen audience satisfaction when the character is finally able to succeed. Or, like in the case-study we’ll look at today, they can be used to draw what appeared to be disparate plots together in longer works.

Read more on WordPress

Story idea: the local Academy of Magic has an Archaeology Department. They have an ongoing feud with the Necromancy Department because necromancers keep stealing bones from the archaeological lab, and archaeologists keep interrupting necromancy rites to ask the undead about their funerary rites.

The two departments also keep arguing over which one of them has the highest count of “ooops-found-an-ancient-evil-thing-and-almost-destroyed-the-world”.

The things I've seen about this whole fucking DOGE thing, from reputable sources, so far have been

there's a very good chance that this will basically be cut off before it even happens because it would require some form of approval from the House and Senate

presidents cannot make departments so it would actually be an office

their plans involve massively cutting down on regulations relating to safety and the environment and potentially getting rid of the FBI??? Inexplicable.

their promise of saving the country $2 trillion is literally impossible, like every single politician and financial advisor agrees that there is absolutely nothing that could be done to save that amount of money and very few expenses that can actually feasibly be cut (and would only save a few billion at most)

Structuring a Series: Part III

Structuring a Series Part III: Planning a Series from 1 Book

Welcome back to Part III of Structuring a Series!  If you haven’t read Parts I and II yet, you might want to.  Or at least familiarize yourself with Dan Wells’s 7 Point Plot Structure. (No word on which one is a bigger time commitment.) Ok, so… you want to write a trilogy (or some other type of close-ended series with at least one arc running through the whole thing), BUT you only know what you…

View On WordPress

OCEAN’S EIGHT (2018) dir. Gary Ross

Most shows with overpowered supernatural characters always try to come up with elaborate excuses to explain why the characters can’t just magic themselves out of every situation. Good Omens doesn’t really do that, but you don’t really question it because you completely buy that these morons are so unequivocally incompetent that they straight up forget that they have the powers of fucking demigods. They’re like high-level d&d characters who only use the same three moves and have completely forgotten about the 73 magic items sitting in their inventory. 

The war on drugs is rooted in racist policies . The failure of the war and drugs is obvious. We need to find a better solution, because people of color should never be the victims of racist policies. White Americans are more likely than black Americans to have used most kinds of illegal drugs, including cocaine and LSD. Yet blacks are far more likely to go to prison for marijuana, which is not a hard drug. Moreover , even when white people get caught , they get less time in prison. 

Outlining: one writer’s approach

…So I was puttering around on Twitter the other day, as one does, and in mid-putter found that someone on my timeline had just RT’d some tweets from a discussion about which approach to writing a book (or other longish piece of prose) was the best: pantsing or plotting. (”Pantsing”, for those of you who may not have come across the term, indicates just sort of making up a story as you go along, without establishing an underlying structure first or (sometimes) knowing how it’s going to end. “Plotting” means having some kind of plan about where the story is going to go – which I would normally take as meaning a premise or outline of some sort.)

And the person at the core of this particular thread, Rebecca F. Kuang, said this:

wait can someone who isn’t a pantser actually explain themselves? how detailed does your outlines get? do you really know the sequence of and content of every scene ahead of time? how you figure out smaller plot threads before you’re ~in~ it?

Since I’m emphatically not a pantser, but a four-decade plotter, I thought maybe I could bring something useful to the discussion. I asked how much detail on the process was wanted? as I’d been doing this for a while.

Rebecca said: 

haha well what i’m most curious about is how you can “feel” the story’s tone/heft/urgency and connect with the characters and their plight from an abstract outline? i’d like to plan more, but i have a hard time thinking from a birds eye view

It’s a good question. But for a moment there I was brought up short, as the concept of an “abstract” outline kind of startled me. I couldn’t imagine what kind of outline that would be. And then the horrible thought occurred: Wait. Can it be that when some of these folks hear “outline” they’re thinking about that godawful high-school English kind of thing? Full of Roman numerals and numbers and capital letters and small letters – ? 

Oh gods no. No no no no no no, it’s not like that at all.

…So I got into the subject a little: what novel outlines can look like, the trick I was taught about how to structure them, and how to make them work for you. (There are some references to Scrivener in there, because that’s what I use, but the advice will work perfectly well no matter what software or other instrumentality you’re using. My outlines tend to start out with pen and writing paper, but they don’t stay on paper for long.) There are also a couple of examples of the kind of outline you would send an editor when querying.

The thread got long, and a little disjointed. So when it was over I cut my bits together and polished them a little; and at the end added one (extremely important) afternote. Then I put it up on my main blog, right here. So if this is a subject that might interest you, maybe you want to take a look, as (to my great pleasure) I’m already hearing from people who say they’re finding the info / approach in the post useful.

Just as an FYI: A copy of the post will also go up on FicFoundry.com when that site goes live at the end of the month, as that’s where all my writing stuff will be going from now on. (It was past time that whole batch of content had someplace of its own. That’s getting sorted now.)

…And now back to work. (Yet another outline, as it happens…) :)