Hardcorebardcore - Hardcore Bardcore

No matter how many of you see this, reblog and then wait.

No one:

Still no one:

Absolutely no one:

Me: *simping over fictional characters and celebs who will never know of my existence* This is fine.

I tried to make a video for a friend and forgot my mother was in the room

Earlier today I witnessed a blogger being upset that people don't understand that when someone is yelling 'how much they hate cishet people' they should realise that it's not aimed towards them but it generalizes and it makes people feel bad. I know that there's a thin grey line here between right and wrong and it gets really blurred on tumblr. Did this whole cishet thing evolve over the past six months? or has it always existed and I haven't been around those bloggers?

I’m not sure I quite understand the wording of the question but I’ll do my best to answer;

I’ve found that a general chunk of tumblr has begun to take a common dislike for the profile of thin, beautiful, cishet females, and also cishet male figures.

Similarly, I’ve heard stories about people of those descriptions bullying already marginalized and oppressed groups of people.

Even more similarly, tumblr lately seems to be shoving the idea of ‘nobody needs gender’ down everybody’s throats. I’ve even seen in a couple posts that pink and glittery things don’t necessarily have to be feminine, and that butch manly things don’t necessarily have to be masculine.

While that is true to some extent, tumblr needs to realize that some things just have to be left as what they are; just things. If we continue to blur the definition of ‘boy’ and ‘girl’ and ‘masculine’ and ‘feminine’ as we do, and eliminate all labels from everything, how are humans to keep themselves comfortable and organized like our nature demonstrates?

Words like boy and girl and feminine and masculine will cease to exist. Sexuality will become a thing of the past and everybody will love everybody, and be able to see past gender and any other qualities that define a person as themselves. While that sounds like a good idea in concept, the way we are working towards achieving such a goal is damaging and harmful to those of us who would prefer to define ourselves with labels.

Sure it’s a cool thing to imagine a world where everybody loves everybody equally, but wouldn’t that just make everybody a clone of each other? Everything would be okay. You could be anything you wanted to and people wouldn’t care. It would be unideal and people wouldn’t be upset. Why? Because everybody loves everybody.

Family would be erased. Friendship would be erased. Connections wouldn’t exist anymore. Government and laws would be wiped out. Bank robberies would be fine. Rape wouldn’t be illegal anymore. People could drink and drive, do drugs, destroy property, and everything would be okay, because there would be no rules.

Anybody could die, be murdered, kill themselves, commit numerous crimes, and nobody would be heartbroken, because it’s okay. Everything is fine. It’ll always be fine.

Do you see what I’m poking at here?

I think we can all agree that this is Eren’s real eye color

“It is illegal for women to go topless in most cities, yet you can buy a magazine of a woman without her top on at any 7-11 store. So, you can sell breasts, but you cannot wear breasts, in America.”

Violet Rose (via c-icatrix)

This is one of my favorite quotes about sexualization/objectification vs autonomy of female bodies bc it’s so succinct

(via platonicsbeforeerotics)

I’m not sure which is my favorite