I remain forever unconvinced that normality is normal.
Real talk re calling yourself an atheist vs. saying you're agnostic:
If you're willing to have believers preach at you because they think you're open minded and indecisive, say you're agnostic.
If you'd like to skip the preaching and go straight to the anger at you for daring to so shamelessly exist without belief in a deity, say you're an atheist.
Either way, they're going to be mad at you. I prefer to save myself the trouble, personally.
(For the record, I'm technically an agnostic atheist, but that is a concept almost no one gets, so I say one or the other when I'm not in the mood or place for giving a big philosophy lesson.)
The practice of clinics, centers, bars, universities, organizations, etc. giving out free condoms, while menstrual hygiene products remain expensive, may seem like a patriarchal nod to the needs of cis-het men over those who menstruate.
It absolutely is not.
Handing out free condoms was, is, and always will be (as long as the patriarchy exists, anyway) a radical act. It is a result of the movement to mitigate the spread of HIV/AIDS in the face of deathly inaction on the part of most mainstream institutions at the time.
That any of us ever believe that free condoms are a product of the patriarchy is a victory for the homophobic erasure of the fight against HIV/AIDS. I once fell for it, too, but it's simply untrue.
Yes to free condoms, and yes to free menstrual supplies.
so I was poking around for more info on the composer for Stray. IMDB?
ok, cool. but I want to know more. to the personal site!
so charmingly minimal, but I want to know even more. Twitter?
wait a minute. where do I know that screen name from?
*gasp*
I hear there's a show called "24 Legacy". Soooo, is it not rewatchable?
AND THEN OUT OF ALL OF THOSE THEY ALL USE THE SAME ONE (1) OUTHOUSE ANYWAY
My former foster kitty Mavis (née Duchess) was incredibly cruel with her affections. Every time I would bring a big strong paper bag home for her benefit, she would fall in love with its crinkly noises. Then, she would use it and use it until the bag had no crinkles left, at which point she'd become bored and leave it alone. There it would sit, reduced to a sad lonely life of uselessness.
Alas, poor shopping bags, destroyed by love and then abandoned.
Even though religious women who cover up will claim that they believe in feminism and free choice, they sure do love to call their own particular style of clothing "modest".
Think about that for two (2) seconds.
I don't think it's random, accidental, or coincidental. Words mean things. If you want to reclaim that style of dress as by and for women, rather than dictated by men and imposed on women, then you really do have to step away from the inherently patriarchal branding embedded in words like "modest".
And I'm speaking as a former devoted hijab-wearer. "High-coverage" is right there for the taking. You could also specify what you mean by "modest": high-necked, long-sleeved, loose-fitting, ankle-length, dark-colored, whatever. It's not like women even within the same religion agree on what's suitably "modest". Saying what you mean is a good thing.
The only time we met was enough My heart is a stopped clock Stuck on one particular time