After A Long Time I Decided To Draw Another Darkiplier. I Hope That You Will Like It @markiplier

So I've been thinking

We all know how in the Bio Inc. video, Dr. Schneeplestein says “I need your HELP! SAVE him, SAVE jacks-ANTI”

This has been confusing a lot of people, but one thing Sean did really stood out to me.

When going through art in his fanart video, he fluidly said Jack when he was talking about Anti and went on like nothing was wrong.

What if this whole time, we’ve been trying to save the wrong person? What if the real one that needs help…is Anti?

@fear-is-nameless @schneeplestein-protection-squad @chase-brody-protection-squad @anti-support-group What are your thoughts on this?

@therealjacksepticeye

@therealjacksepticeye Well, well, well Anti, maybe we created you as an evil being. But who said that somewhere inside you can not be good? Sweetheart I believe that you’re not as bad as everybody think. Maybe you just need to believe it. 😉 Can you try it? 😉 And what about you guys?

@therealjacksepticeye Although I have inflammation in both hands, but it didn’t stop me to draw this sympathetic guy. 😃😃😃 I realy love that demotic child. #septicart

Here is my drawing of DanTDM. 😊 I hope that you guys will like it 😊

@therealjacksepticeye H̸̶̬̞͍̖͖̕͢͡ū̺͇͓͂̈̕͜s͔̟͇ͧ͌ḩ̱͖̼ ̴̰͚͒m̨̯̖̗̳̊̓ͬͬ͘y̡̛͚͙̱͖̬͒ͧ͆͞ ̭̤̼͡͏͡p̲̰ͦ̔͋u̷̧͉͍͖̕͢҉p̥̎̈ͦ̓͞pͫ̃͆̈́͆̀͟͝ḙ̡̬̻̺̓̈́̆̒̂͏̴́͡t͙ͬ

Congratulation to 17 millions subscribers! I’m so proud of you @therealjacksepticeye

Happy birthday to big sister Kouyou.

It's not only you I heard it too. 😉

Is it just me or does it sound like he’s saying “Save him. Save Jackse- Anti”

I recently got photoshop, so I thought I’d try to colour a sketch I did a while ago.  

I have a lot to learn, but hey it was fun :D

#Saveyourinternet

The European Commission and the European Parliament really disappointed me and I'm sure that I'm not alone. Because they are saying that they are trying to protect smaller authors and creators in the Europe, but in fact their current version of the article 13 could destroy thousands of them. Yes, I know the article 13 should protect film studios, musicians, writers and others artists from the illegal distribution of their works. So for an example there shouldn't be web sides where is a possibility to download movies, songs, books or another artistic works for free, because that's illegal. There should be only web sides, which have a contract with the company or directly an artist who own mentioned product and I agree with this. But what about our youtubers a lot of them could be destroyed and why? Just because of the current version of the article 13 doesn't think about exceptions. Thousands of people across the Europe could lose their jobs, because of this. The article 13 says that people can't work with things, which they didn't create. But what about "let's players", because they didn't create games, which they are playing. But when we think about that they aren't doing anything wrong or illegal, because they bought games or got them from developers. When we're watching "Let's plays or gaming video" from "gamer" we can hear him/her to talk about the game quality. In fact by playing and talking about games they make an advertising to the developers and gaming industry. So I think that there should be a better definition for them. Another category are reaction videos or reviews, because there could be some troubles too so there are another missing definitions. The same problem is with tutorials, educational videos or various types of compilations, because there we need some definitions as well. And finaly special categories like parodies, covers or karaoke which should have some special rules. Right now the Article 13 is so poorly defined that it's in conflict with freedom of an expression and human rights. So I hope that together with EU we will find a solution that will be good for everyone.