>:3
and kirk, the guy who backdoored twitter and posted all those "send btc to this address and ill double it!1!!111!" tweets on celeb and billionaire accounts, gets 2 years in jail. g fucking g
why can rockstar games institutionalise you for life like nikita kruschev for being autistic
only on faceit and esea! racial slurs can only get you muted on valve servers
rule
my favorite queer furries with autism moment is the queer furries at who leaked private governmental data and hijacked and vandalized government websites, all because some american states started banning gender-affirming care
Thank god for queer furries with autism
Hi. Pretty much all my fanfiction and some of my fanart has been uploaded to Ai.
I'm typing with a lot of anger and hurt right now so pardon me if don''t make sense. I've been told of people seeing excerpts of my written work showing up in character chat bots before, specfically with my IZ work and Solar Lunacy, and more recently The Rehabilitation of Death (TROD) and I'm so tired.
I've put these images together very hastily and I didn't have the heart to add much more. I've blocked out the names for the sake of privacy for the creators of these, but allow me to be explicitly clear:
I DO NOT consent for my work to be uploaded to any AI databases, chat bots, artificial character chat rooms or similar.
Not only are you morally fucking over authors and artists, but you can put us into severe legal trouble as well. This is not negotiable. I will never be able to undo the damage this has done, even if these chat bots go down, my writing and the artwork is now uploaded to the database.
This has made me reconsider sharing my writing online more than any online discourse would have ever done. If you do this, please consider what damage and disrespect you are doing to us, and please block me if you're fine with it.
@chaoticbathwater
krips my beloved
Remember kids, this isn't an exclusive or situation
The issue with "porn addiction" rhetoric, aside from it being scientifically unfounded, is that it's just another line that makes excuses for men.
Blaming the objectification and degradation of women and girls on "porn addicts" creates a divide -- between good men, upright men, men we love, men who would never dream of mistreating women; and bad men, predatory men, men who are evil because something within their brains is broken. It says that no, the issue isn't societal, it's an issue innate to a specific type of person. My favorite man would never do such a thing!
And this is exactly why it's so popular with conservatives, why its main proponents are religious organizations. On one hand, it takes one of the core harms done by misogyny and repackages it into something that can instead be blamed on individual moral failing. On the other, it provides a justification to attack any expression of sexuality beyond the monogamous, Christian standard by claiming that any and all sexual desire is proof of "degeneracy".