As Google has worked to overtake the internet, its search algorithm has not just gotten worse. It has been designed to prioritize advertisers and popular pages often times excluding pages and content that better matches your search terms
As a writer in need of information for my stories, I find this unacceptable. As a proponent of availability of information so the populace can actually educate itself, it is unforgivable.
Below is a concise list of useful research sites compiled by Edward Clark over on Facebook. I was familiar with some, but not all of these.
⁂
Google is so powerful that it “hides” other search systems from us. We just don’t know the existence of most of them. Meanwhile, there are still a huge number of excellent searchers in the world who specialize in books, science, other smart information. Keep a list of sites you never heard of.
www.refseek.com - Academic Resource Search. More than a billion sources: encyclopedia, monographies, magazines.
www.worldcat.org - a search for the contents of 20 thousand worldwide libraries. Find out where lies the nearest rare book you need.
https://link.springer.com - access to more than 10 million scientific documents: books, articles, research protocols.
www.bioline.org.br is a library of scientific bioscience journals published in developing countries.
http://repec.org - volunteers from 102 countries have collected almost 4 million publications on economics and related science.
www.science.gov is an American state search engine on 2200+ scientific sites. More than 200 million articles are indexed.
www.pdfdrive.com is the largest website for free download of books in PDF format. Claiming over 225 million names.
www.base-search.net is one of the most powerful researches on academic studies texts. More than 100 million scientific documents, 70% of them are free
bring back tumblr ask culture let me. bother you with questions and statements
reblog if you wear glasses. too many mutuals don't know they have glasses wearers in their midsts
Not been tagged, but...
@real-british-empire @same-pic-rick-roll
This is a trend, so why not..?
Online Political Strategy Geniuses: You don't get it-- you can't just vote about one issue like "should the United States relentlessly murder children". Because if you do that, you're throwing other vulnerable people under the bus, like trans people. The best people to protect trans people are child-murderers, we all know this!!
Kamala: *asked a question about whether she wants to protect trans people, twitching nervously* I think laws are where democracy sheds light on our decencies but also we must mitigate our risks, which means that under the current circumstances, we must be respectful of perspectives. Is Donald Trump forcing you to ask me this???
Look how excited she is to answer this question!!! (X)
Single - 1
Couple - 2
Few - 3 or 4
Several - 5 or 6
Lots - 7-11 but not 9
Nine - 9 (antiquated)
Dozen - 12
Baker's Dozen - 13
Candlestick Maker's Dozen - 14 or 15
Like At Least Twenty - 16 to 18
Thousands Upon Thousands - 19
Infinite - 20 or More
colourfullackoffungus
get disturbed
I've rarely seen a more validating sentence in my entire life.
Sometimes when I haven't taken my adhd meds, I don't even get a whole song stuck in my head. Sometimes it's shit like a 10-second loop of a single line "now where is the one that you called god?" sung to the tune of the Oompa Loompa song.
This is not a shitpost. It is, however, a shit post.
Thank you for coming to my TED talk.