WHY?! WHY they all trying to destroy such an amazing story (both comics and movie) and brilliant characters.
They doing this fucking reboot. In the comics, they destroyed Spuffy relationship giving the most idiotic excuse ever (for this characters). Everyone complains that the plot is disappointing and characters behave in a weird way.
They’re doing a buffy reboot… Like… Why? I mean if it’s like a sequel thing maybe but if it’s just a real reboot… Nope? Besides… Honestly… Can it ever be as good as the original?
And don’t those people have new fresh ideas for shows anymore??? The amount of reboots around are astonishing. We’re already getting Charmed, now we’re getting Buffy as well? What’s next? The Pretender? The Sentinel?
,,The actor tells Inverse that he’s “relieved” that his Star Trek journey is over, despite good memories of the cast and crew. Now, Isaacs says he can finally tell the truth as to why he took the role of Captain Lorca..and Isaacs heavily implies we’ll never see Prime Lorca either...” :(
#BRINGBACKLORCA
Discovery will never be the same!!
Hard choice... Lorca
And like someone said before:
She was strong not only because of her power.
A lot of people see her as a little silly girl, while she is a strong female character!!
Sarah Michelle Gellar deserved an Emmy for “Buffy the Vampire Slayer,” and the fact that she was snubbed is something I’ll never be ok with. Buffy, not only as a character but also as a show, was and still is to this day such a huge pop culture influence. The show gave TV the first lesbian kiss (the fact that it didn’t happen until the year 2000… yikes) and paved the way for better representation… No one else could’ve done Buffy justice the way Sarah did. She was the heart of this show and really demonstrated that women are multifaceted, and that if you’re “strong” you’re not just the “strong” girl, you have weaknesses and are capable of being vulnerable and that it’s ok to be both. And it’s also ok to be fed up with men and call them out for their abusive patterns and blatant misogyny. And it’s ok to slay vampires in heels and look super hot while doing it. She really was THAT bitch. The fact that her performance was written off by the television academy because they only saw it as a “teen vampire soap opera” is really messed up and unforgivable.
haha.. he just can't hide from us :P
It was also my first reaction!
I wanted to scream: ONE MORE TIME! I will go to cinema again. It was SOOO GOOOD
“King Arthur: Legend of the Sword” was amazing!
Alright, so my boyfriend’s first review of the movie was that it was “a movie for people with ADHD, made by people with ADHD”, because he thought the pacing and action was crazy fast, and he could barely follow what was happening at times. Lol!
And, while he is right that the pacing and action was pretty intense, this is one of the things I just loved about this movie! The regular jumping back and forth between narration and cut-scenes with the fast paced music (and often great visuals). Then again, I do have ADHD, so maybe he was onto something there. Lol!
To me, it’s a movie that falls more or less into the “Tron: Legacy” category. i.e. a feast for the senses that doesn’t need to have a solid plot or even remotely make sense to be enjoyed. And the 3D on that one is superb!
My immediate reaction when it ended was pretty much to go: “OMFG! This was so much fun and awesome! Can we watch it again? Like now. Now would be good. I need that soundtrack.” (While my boyfriend’s was something a little closer to “I need a moment to catch my breath and to process this. What just happened?” Lol!)
Also, I can’t help but be amused by the fact that Arthur (Charlie Hunnam) was raised in a brothel, and I think someone (Bedivere, possibly) mentions at some point in front of Goosefat Bill (Aidan Gillen) how much he’s blossomed (or filled out… Can’t remember what term was used exactly) since the last time he saw him.
Now, most of you probably know Aidan Gillen as “Littlefinger” (a.k.a. Petyr Baelish) on “Game of Thrones”.
But Gillen also played Stuart Jones on UK’s “Queer As Folk”. Where a then 18-year-old Charlie Hunnam played Stuart’s 15-year-old lover, Nathan Maloney. So, seeing Bill basically assessing Arthur / checking him out in that scene, where he and Bedivere are wondering what he can do with that sword, and having one of them comment on the fact that Arthur’s more or less all grown up now…
Let’s say it was a little difficult to refrain from smiling.
I’m guessing old “Queer As Folk” fans are probably going to be having a field day with this movie, and “Arthur/Bill” shippers will be glad to know there’s plenty of steamy material for them out there.
Should you ever wonder what would have happened if a younger Bill had ever come to that brothel when Arthur was 18, and shared an intimate moment with him? Wonder no more! YouTube has the answers you seek.
More seriously though, Hunnam and Gillen both gave very solid performances in their respective roles, and Gillen even managed to make me completely forget about Littlefinger, which is quite a feat!
OMG, it's so true!!
Blood works like Viagra :)
LISTEN if blood has to flow to a penis for a hard on how do vampires have sex if they have no blood pumping round their body HOW, because that’s not very sexy of them
Live long and prosper
I agree, and I love this tag :)