Curate, connect, and discover
Gravitational Waves - Blog Posts
Black Holes: Seeing the Invisible!
Black holes are some of the most bizarre and fascinating objects in the cosmos. Astronomers want to study lots of them, but there’s one big problem – black holes are invisible! Since they don’t emit any light, it’s pretty tough to find them lurking in the inky void of space. Fortunately there are a few different ways we can “see” black holes indirectly by watching how they affect their surroundings.
Speedy stars
If you’ve spent some time stargazing, you know what a calm, peaceful place our universe can be. But did you know that a monster is hiding right in the heart of our Milky Way galaxy? Astronomers noticed stars zipping superfast around something we can’t see at the center of the galaxy, about 10 million miles per hour! The stars must be circling a supermassive black hole. No other object would have strong enough gravity to keep them from flying off into space.
Two astrophysicists won half of the Nobel Prize in Physics last year for revealing this dark secret. The black hole is truly monstrous, weighing about four million times as much as our Sun! And it seems our home galaxy is no exception – our Hubble Space Telescope has revealed that the hubs of most galaxies contain supermassive black holes.
Shadowy silhouettes
Technology has advanced enough that we’ve been able to spot one of these supermassive black holes in a nearby galaxy. In 2019, astronomers took the first-ever picture of a black hole in a galaxy called M87, which is about 55 million light-years away. They used an international network of radio telescopes called the Event Horizon Telescope.
In the image, we can see some light from hot gas surrounding a dark shape. While we still can’t see the black hole itself, we can see the “shadow” it casts on the bright backdrop.
Shattered stars
Black holes can come in a smaller variety, too. When a massive star runs out of the fuel it uses to shine, it collapses in on itself. These lightweight or “stellar-mass” black holes are only about 5-20 times as massive as the Sun. They’re scattered throughout the galaxy in the same places where we find stars, since that’s how they began their lives. Some of them started out with a companion star, and so far that’s been our best clue to find them.
Some black holes steal material from their companion star. As the material falls onto the black hole, it gets superhot and lights up in X-rays. The first confirmed black hole astronomers discovered, called Cygnus X-1, was found this way.
If a star comes too close to a supermassive black hole, the effect is even more dramatic! Instead of just siphoning material from the star like a smaller black hole would do, a supermassive black hole will completely tear the star apart into a stream of gas. This is called a tidal disruption event.
Making waves
But what if two companion stars both turn into black holes? They may eventually collide with each other to form a larger black hole, sending ripples through space-time – the fabric of the cosmos!
These ripples, called gravitational waves, travel across space at the speed of light. The waves that reach us are extremely weak because space-time is really stiff.
Three scientists received the 2017 Nobel Prize in Physics for using LIGO to observe gravitational waves that were sent out from colliding stellar-mass black holes. Though gravitational waves are hard to detect, they offer a way to find black holes without having to see any light.
We’re teaming up with the European Space Agency for a mission called LISA, which stands for Laser Interferometer Space Antenna. When it launches in the 2030s, it will detect gravitational waves from merging supermassive black holes – a likely sign of colliding galaxies!
Rogue black holes
So we have a few ways to find black holes by seeing stuff that’s close to them. But astronomers think there could be 100 million black holes roaming the galaxy solo. Fortunately, our Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope will provide a way to “see” these isolated black holes, too.
Roman will find solitary black holes when they pass in front of more distant stars from our vantage point. The black hole’s gravity will warp the starlight in ways that reveal its presence. In some cases we can figure out a black hole’s mass and distance this way, and even estimate how fast it’s moving through the galaxy.
For more about black holes, check out these Tumblr posts!
⚫ Gobble Up These Black (Hole) Friday Deals!
⚫ Hubble’s 5 Weirdest Black Hole Discoveries
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com.
Cosmic Couples and Devastating Breakups
Relationships can be complicated — especially if you’re a pair of stars. Sometimes you start a downward spiral you just can’t get out of, eventually crash together and set off an explosion that can be seen 130 million light-years away.
For Valentine’s Day, we’re exploring the bonds between some of the universe’s peculiar pairs … as well as a few of their cataclysmic endings.
Stellar Couples
When you look at a star in the night sky, you may really be viewing two or more stars dancing around each other. Scientists estimate three or four out of every five Sun-like stars in the Milky Way have at least one partner. Take our old north star Thuban, for example. It’s a binary, or two-star, system in the constellation Draco.
Alpha Centauri, our nearest stellar neighbor, is actually a stellar triangle. Two Sun-like stars, Rigil Kentaurus and Toliman, form a pair (called Alpha Centauri AB) that orbit each other about every 80 years. Proxima Centauri is a remote red dwarf star caught in their gravitational pull even though it sits way far away from them (like over 300 times the distance between the Sun and Neptune).
Credit: ESO/Digitized Sky Survey 2/Davide De Martin/Mahdi Zamani
Sometimes, though, a stellar couple ends its relationship in a way that’s really disastrous for one of them. A black widow binary, for example, contains a low-mass star, called a brown dwarf, and a rapidly spinning, superdense stellar corpse called a pulsar. The pulsar generates intense radiation and particle winds that blow away the material of the other star over millions to billions of years.
Black Hole Beaus
In romance novels, an air of mystery is essential for any love interest, and black holes are some of the most mysterious phenomena in the universe. They also have very dramatic relationships with other objects around them!
Scientists have observed two types of black holes. Supermassive black holes are hundreds of thousands to billions of times our Sun’s mass. One of these monsters, called Sagittarius A* (the “*” is pronounced “star”), sits at the center of our own Milky Way. In a sense, our galaxy and its black hole are childhood sweethearts — they’ve been together for over 13 billion years! All the Milky-Way-size galaxies we’ve seen so far, including our neighbor Andromeda (pictured below), have supermassive black holes at their center!
These black-hole-galaxy power couples sometimes collide with other, similar pairs — kind of like a disastrous double date! We’ve never seen one of these events happen before, but scientists are starting to model them to get an idea of what the resulting fireworks might look like.
One of the most dramatic and fleeting relationships a supermassive black hole can have is with a star that strays too close. The black hole’s gravitational pull on the unfortunate star causes it to bulge on one side and break apart into a stream of gas, which is called a tidal disruption event.
The other type of black hole you often hear about is stellar-mass black holes, which are five to tens of times the Sun’s mass. Scientists think these are formed when a massive star goes supernova. If there are two massive stars in a binary, they can leave behind a pair of black holes that are tied together by their gravity. These new black holes spiral closer and closer until they crash together and create a larger black hole. The National Science Foundation’s LIGO project has detected many of these collisions through ripples in space-time called gravitational waves.
Credit: LIGO/T. Pyle
Here’s hoping your Valentine’s Day is more like a peacefully spiraling stellar binary and less like a tidal disruption! Learn how to have a safe relationship of your own with black holes here.
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com
“The ascension to the tenth level of intellectual heaven would be if we find the question to which the universe is the answer, and the nature of that question in and of itself explains why it was possible to describe it in so many different ways.” - Nima Arkani-Hamed
https://www.newyorker.com/science/elements/a-different-kind-of-theory-of-everything
That's true with stars. We can never see stars or planets in the 'now' bc it took the light we are seeing time to get to us.
Even the sunlight takes 8 minutes to travel from the sun to earth, so if the sun exploded, we wouldn't know for 8 minutes.
In 2015, LIGO detected some gravitational waves from something that happened 1.3 billion years ago, in the constellation, Hydra. If you were on Hydra looking at Earth rn, you'd be seeing Earth from 1.3 billion years ago. 1.3 billion years ago, we were in the Mesoproterozoic Era here on earth. Life was just beginning to develop into multi-cellular organisms.
In conclusion: yes
wait i was in a tiktok comment section for something abt space and im no scientist obviously, but what if the reason we haven't found proof of life in space yet is because light takes time to travel from there to earth. like we arent seeing what's currently happening up there just what was happening way in the past.
Gravitational Waves in the Space-Time Continuum
Einstein's Theories of Relativity
Einstein has two theories of relativity. The first is The Theory of Special Relativity (1905). This is a theory of mechanics that correctly describes the motions of objects moving near the speed of light. This theory predicts that mass increases with velocity. The equation is E=MC^2 or Energy = Mass × Speed of Light ^2.
In 1916, Einstein proposed the Theory of General Relativity, which generalized his Theory of Special Relativity and had the first predictions of gravitational waves. It implied a few things.
Space-Time is a 4-Dimensional continuum.
Principle of equivalence of gravitational and inertial mass.
This suggests that Mass-Energy distorts the fabric of space-time in a predictable way (gravitational waves). It also implies
Strong gravitational force makes time slow down.
Light is altered by gravity
Gravity in strong gravitational fields will no longer obey Newton's Inverse-Square Law.
What is Newton's Inverse-Square Law?
Newton's Inverse-Square Law suggests that the force of gravity between any two objects is inversely proportional to the square of the separation distance between the two centers.
Stephen Hawking's Theory of Everything
Stephen Hawking's Theory of Everything is the solution to Einstein's equation in his Theory of General Relativity. It says that the mass density of the universe exceeds the critical density.
Critical Density: amount of mass needed to make a universe adopt a flat geometry.
This theory states that when the universe gets too big it will crash back into its center in a "Big Crunch" creating giant black hole. The energy from this "Big Crunch" will rebound and create a new "Big Bang".
Big Crunch: hypothetical scenario for the end of the known universe. The expansion of the universe will reverse and collapse on itself. The energy generated will create a new Big Bang, creating a new universe.
Big Bang: Matter will expand from a single point from a state of high density and matter. This will mark the birth of a new universe.
Basic Facts about Gravitational Waves
Invisible "ripples" in the Space-Time Continuum
Travel at the speed of light
186,000 miles per second / 299,337.984 Kilometers per second
11,160,000 miles per minute / 17,960,279.04 Kilometers per minute
669,600,000 miles per hour / 1,077,616,742.4 Kilometers per hour
There are four (4) defined categories
Continuous
Stochastic
Burst
Compact Binary Inspiral
What is LIGO?
The first proof of the existence of gravitational waves came in 1974. 20+ years after Einstein's death.
The first physical proof came in 2015, 100 years after his theory was published. The waves were detected by LIGO.
LIGO- Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory
The waves detected in 2015 came from 2 black holes that collided 1.3 billion years ago in the constellation Hydra. 1.3 billion years ago multicellular life was just beginning to spread on Earth, it was before the time of the dinosaurs!
Continuous Gravitational Waves
Produced by a single spinning massive object.
Caused by imperfections on the surface.
The spin rate of the object is constant. The waves are come at a continuous frequency.
Stochastic Gravitational Waves
Smalles waves
Hardest to detect
Possibly caused by remnants of gravitational radiation left over from the Big Bang
Could possibly allow us to look at the history of the Universe.
Small waves from every direction mixed together.
Burst Gravitational Waves
Never been detected.
Like ever.
Never ever.
Not once.
Nope
No
N E V E R
We don't know anything about them.
If we learn about them they could reveal the greatest revolutionary information about the universe.
Compact Binary Inspiral Gravitational Waves
All waves detected by LIGO fall into this category.
Produced by orbiting pairs of massive and dense objects. (Neutron Stars, Black Holes)
Three (3) subclasses
Binary Neutron Star (BNS) // Two (2) Neutron Stars colliding
Binary Black Hole (BBH) // Two (2) Black Holes colliding
Neutron Star- Black Hole Binary (NSBH) // A black hole and a neutron star colliding
Each subclass creates its own unique wave pattern.
Waves are all caused by the smae mechanism called an "inspiral".
Occur over millions of years.
Over eons the objects orbit closer together.
The closer they get, the faster they spin.
Sources Used:
On The Shoulders Of Giants by Stephen Hawking
Oxford Astronomy Encyclopedia
@watch-out-idiot-passing-through @nasa
XD the comments below the minutephysics video gravitational waves explained
There is nothing to add, it just deserves reblogging. I can’t even begin to explain why it turns me on so much.
What are Gravitational Waves?
Today, the National Science Foundation (NSF) announced the detection of gravitational waves by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO), a pair of ground-based observatories. But…what are gravitational waves? Let us explain:
Gravitational waves are disturbances in space-time, the very fabric of the universe, that travel at the speed of light. The waves are emitted by any mass that is changing speed or direction. The simplest example is a binary system, where a pair of stars or compact objects (like black holes) orbit their common center of mass.
We can think of gravitational effects as curvatures in space-time. Earth’s gravity is constant and produces a static curve in space-time. A gravitational wave is a curvature that moves through space-time much like a water wave moves across the surface of a lake. It is generated only when masses are speeding up, slowing down or changing direction.
Did you know Earth also gives off gravitational waves? Earth orbits the sun, which means its direction is always changing, so it does generate gravitational waves, although extremely weak and faint.
What do we learn from these waves?
Observing gravitational waves would be a huge step forward in our understanding of the evolution of the universe, and how large-scale structures, like galaxies and galaxy clusters, are formed.
Gravitational waves can travel across the universe without being impeded by intervening dust and gas. These waves could also provide information about massive objects, such as black holes, that do not themselves emit light and would be undetectable with traditional telescopes.
Just as we need both ground-based and space-based optical telescopes, we need both kinds of gravitational wave observatories to study different wavelengths. Each type complements the other.
Ground-based: For optical telescopes, Earth’s atmosphere prevents some wavelengths from reaching the ground and distorts the light that does.
Space-based: Telescopes in space have a clear, steady view. That said, telescopes on the ground can be much larger than anything ever launched into space, so they can capture more light from faint objects.
How does this relate to Einstein’s theory of relativity?
The direct detection of gravitational waves is the last major prediction of Einstein’s theory to be proven. Direct detection of these waves will allow scientists to test specific predictions of the theory under conditions that have not been observed to date, such as in very strong gravitational fields.
In everyday language, “theory” means something different than it does to scientists. For scientists, the word refers to a system of ideas that explains observations and experimental results through independent general principles. Isaac Newton’s theory of gravity has limitations we can measure by, say, long-term observations of the motion of the planet Mercury. Einstein’s relativity theory explains these and other measurements. We recognize that Newton’s theory is incomplete when we make sufficiently sensitive measurements. This is likely also true for relativity, and gravitational waves may help us understand where it becomes incomplete.
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space: http://nasa.tumblr.com
Can you explain in a simple (???) way gravitational waves? please? do you know any books about it?
Sure!
According to Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, what we think of as "empty space” isn’t nothing. Instead, space is more like a fabric that can be stretched, squashed, bent and shaped, and all matter and energy cause space to bend around them. The more mass or energy something has, the greater the bending of space around it it causes, a bit like heavier and lighter balls on a rubber sheet:
(Source - Note that this picture is a 2D analogy, and space is actually 3D! The bending of space isn’t something we can easily visualise, so we have to use analogies like the “balls on a rubber sheet” analogy - as long as we recognise their shortcomings!)
Let’s imagine the Sun is a bowling ball dropped onto a rubber sheet, creating a huge dent in space. And now let’s roll a marble - Earth - onto that sheet too. IF the marble is rolling too slowly, it will fall into the dent and roll around a few times, spiralling in and eventually colliding with the ball. If the marble is rolling too quickly, its path will be bent, but it will escape. If it’s rolling at a certain speed, however, the marble will roll around the bowling ball and go into orbit around it. (Here’s another shortcoming of the rubber sheet analogy - real rubber sheets have friction, so the marble would eventually slow down and roll in towards the bowling ball. Space, however, has no friction, so the Earth can stay in orbit around the Sun for a long time.) In other words, this bending of space is what we refer to as gravity!
In Newton’s view of gravity, Earth would naturally follow a straight line through space, but its path would be bent towards the Sun by a mysterious pulling force. That force holds the planets in orbit around the Sun and pulls apples to Earth, but Newton couldn’t explain why - a mysterious influence that spread out through space, called the gravitational field, somehow caused bodies to attract one another. Einstein explained that massive objects curve the space around them. Earth would also naturally follow a straight line through space, but the space itself is curved, forcing Earth to follow a curved path - it’s a bit like trying to walk in a straight line along a hill. Try as you might, your path will have to bend to follow the contours of the landscape. According to Einstein, gravity isn’t really a “force” as such but an effect of this bending of space. Matter and energy tell space how to bend; space tells matter and energy how to move. That’s all gravity is. The gravitational field isn’t some mysterious entity in space - the gravitational field is the space itself! Here’s a nice little video to help you visualise all this:
(I’m oversimplifying a little, btw, saying that gravity is the bending of “space.” In Einstein’s theory, the three dimensions of space are unified with time into one four-dimensional fabric, the space-time continuum. So gravity isn’t just the bending of space, but the warping of time too - you can’t change one without changing the other! Gravity actually slows time down, so you would age slightly faster in space than you do at Earth’s surface. The difference is incredibly tiny, but measurable - time passes more quickly for the GPS satellites than it does for us here on Earth, and what the clock of a GPS satellite would measure as “one day” is about 38 microseconds shorter than what we measure as “one day.” That doesn’t sound like a big difference, but engineers have to take it into account when designing GPS systems - if they didn’t account for this, your GPS location would drift by as much as 10 kilometres per day! So this isn’t just some abstract theory - this is a real effect that’s already important for technology you probably use every day.)
General Relativity has now been through many, many tests and has passed every one with flying colours, and all of its predictions had been verified by the beginning of 2016 except one - gravitational waves.
What would happen if we could somehow destroy the Sun? Newton believed that there was a mysterious gravitational connection between the Sun and Earth, holding Earth in its orbit, that would instantly be broken if the Sun was destroyed. Earth would instantly fly out of its orbit in a straight line. Einstein, however, didn’t like this - his Special Theory of Relativity (which he put out 10 years before the General Theory) says that no information could ever travel faster than light. It takes about 8 minutes for the Sun’s light to reach us, so how could Earth fly out of its orbit instantly? That would let us know the Sun had been destroyed 8 minutes before the light from the Sun’s destruction reached us. Einstein wasn’t comfortable with this.
Thankfully, General Relativity resolves the paradox - if you got rid of the Sun, Earth would still stay in its orbit for a while, because the space-time around the Sun would still be curved. Meanwhile, at the place where the Sun was, space-time would spring back to its original flat state, and that would ripple through the surrounding space-time as everything adjusted back to where it was. That ripple - a gravitational wave - would spread out through space at the speed of light, so the space around Earth would stay curved and Earth would remain in its orbit until the same time the light from the Sun’s destruction passed us - at which point the gravitational wave would ripple through the space around Earth and restore it back to its original flat state, and Earth would finally leave its orbit.
Of course, in reality, stars don’t just disappear. But the gravitational environment does change. Stars move around, and the fabric of space-time also moves with them. Stars explode. Black holes and neutron stars form, putting huge dents in space-time, and sometimes they collide. All these events are a bit like changing the environment in a still pond - stars and planets gently orbiting are like ducks gently gliding through the pond, creating gentle ripples as they disturb its surface - and black hole collisions are more like throwing a rock into the pond and sending out massive waves. Almost everything in our universe produces gravitational waves, but most of the time, they’re too tiny to detect. (That’s why I said in real space the Earth can orbit the Sun for “a long time,” and not “forever.” Earth is constantly sending out very faint gravitational waves as it rolls around the Sun and moves through the fabric of space-time. Those waves are too small to detect, but they very, very slowly sap Earth’s energy and cause it to very, very slowly spiral in to the Sun. In reality, that would take unimaginable trillions upon trillions of years, and Earth will probably be destroyed by the dying Sun long before that! Even if Earth manages to survive that, it’s more likely to be pulled out of orbit by an incredibly rare passing star or knocked out by unpredictable gravitational tugs from the other planets or something before it spirals into the Sun. Orbits are stable for a very, very, very, very long time.) More intense sources of gravity than our puny Earth and Sun, however - things like neutron stars and black holes - can generate detectable gravitational waves.
Our first indirect evidence of gravitational waves came in 1984, when the American astronomers Russel A. Hulse and Joseph A. Taylor discovered a binary neutron star system - two intense sources of gravity orbiting each other very rapidly. As they orbited each other, they sent out huge gravitational ripples - a bit like stirring up that duck pond with two oars whirling round and round - and lost energy by a detectable amount. Hulse and Taylor found that their orbital period slowed down by about 75 milliseconds per year - short, but detectable! That slowing exactly matched the predictions of gravitational wave theory and got its discoverers the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1993.
(Source)
But gravitational waves weren’t directly observed until 2015 (and confirmed until this year) by a detector named LIGO (the Laser Interferometer Gravitational wave Observatory). All LIGO is is basically two beams of laser light travelling between two pairs of mirrors oriented at right angles to each other, like this, so you can measure how space-time is stretched in one direction and squashed in the other by a passing gravitational wave by recording how long it takes the light to travel from one mirror to the other*:
(Source for both images: http://phys.org/news/2016-02-ligo.html)
LIGO’s two “arms” (the two beams of light) are each 4 kilometres long, and a gravitational wave passing through the detector stretches or squashes each of the “arms” by a ridiculously small amount - the ones LIGO actually found stretched and about 1/10,000th the width of a proton. As you can imagine, the LIGO physicists had to account for many, many different effects that shook the detector too. But gravitational waves distort the two beams in a predictable way that would make that distortion stand out from ordinary passing trucks or distant earthquakes, and by February 11th, 2016, the LIGO physicists were confident enough that they really had detected a faint ripple in space-time passing through their detector. The signal was consistent with a gravitational wave from two black holes in orbit around each other, spiralling in to one another.
(Source)
This is exciting for two reasons:1) It confirms the last outstanding prediction of General Relativity, and2) It opens up a whole new field of astronomy! Every so often astronomy is revolutionised by the discovery of new things we can look at from space. Originally all we could detect was the visible light that we could see with our eyes and telescopes. But soon we learned to build radio telescopes, and that opened up a whole new world to us - we could see phenomena that were invisible in ordinary light. With space telescopes we could see the sky in gamma rays, x-rays, ultraviolet and infra-red light as well. Now we could see the explosions of distant stars halfway across the observable Universe, look at clouds of gas and dust too cool to shine in visible light, and peer through other dark clouds to see stars forming inside. We also found particles we could see coming from space, too - neutrinos from the Sun and from supernovae, and cosmic rays. These opened up other windows on the Universe. And now we have gravitational waves - yet another new way of “seeing.” Gravitational wave astronomy will let us study some of the most puzzling events in the Universe, like colliding neutron stars, or black holes falling into other black holes - events we’ve never been able to see before.
So I hope that helps, Anon!
As for books, the problem is gravitational waves were detected so recently I don’t know of any books that have come out since then on the subject, so everything will be out of date. However, the basic physics has stayed the same since Einstein first predicted them, so any good popular book on general relativity (Spacewarps by John Gribbin, The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene and Travelling At the Speed of Thought: Einstein and the Quest for Gravitational Waves by Daniel Kennefick are good examples) should give you some good insight - just replace phrases like “if we detect gravitational waves” with “when we detected gravitational waves!”
(*Yes, yes, I know LIGO isn’t actually measuring the time taken for light to travel down each “arm,” but the interference of the laser beams. Still, that interference allows us to infer the travel time for the light, so I’m simplifying.)