Not my usual type of content but I was baffled by the sheer stupidity so much I had to make a meme
why do so many antis compare loli/shota to csem?
Like seriously? How do you exploit a drawing?
Those two aren't near the same level.
One is extremly illegal and harms real children. The other is "icky drawings".
"Oh but loli/ shota cons may actually start liking real children" can any anti send actual defining proof this this is true.
Now I am not saying it's not impossible for that to happen. But had it actually ever lead to it?
Being “proship” is common sense, I think the label shouldn’t exist
Hopefully, sometime soon, antis will quiet down and people can stop bothering with labels.
I love being the hype non-judgemental friend. You think you're an old diety from ancient times? Okay girl that makes sense, have you seen yourself!!
YouTuber: Hey, I swear and cuss and yell. But my videos is not geered towards children. It's not my job to monitor your children and make sure they only consume content age appropriate to them.
Anti: Yeah. People shouldn't be expecting random YouTubers to make content for kids.
Horror Writer: Hey, I make graphic and scary media. But my books/movies are not meant for children. And it's not my job to make it appropraite for children/
Anti: Yeah. They made it clear what the movie was in the trailer/poster. If a child watches that and gets scared it's their own fault. The writer made it for adults not kids.
Adult Show Creators: Hey, my show has sexual jokes and violent imagry. But it's not my fault if a child sees my work. My shows are for adults, not children.
Anti: Yeah. Not everything is meant for kids. It's up to parents to make sure their children don't see inapropriate material.
Libriarian: Hey, we have a variety of books including books parents don't agree with. But I'm not payed to monitor what children are reading. The most I can do is ask a child if they know what they're reading and if it's in their age bracket. But I can't memorize the morals of every parent of every child who comes here to make sure they're reading approved books. And it's absurd to expect me to.
Anti: Yeah. Book banning and censorship is alt-right tactics and disgusting. It's not libriarians' jobs to make sure your child is reading books you approve of. If you don't want your child seeing somehting you don't approve of, you monitor them.
Proshipper: Hey, I make content with taboo themes and imagry. But I make it clear children shouldn't be seeing my content and it's not meant for them. My content is meant for adults and it's not my job to parent random people's children.
Anti: That's groomer logic! Keep that shit to yourself! What if a child sees it!? You deserve to rot in jail! KYS! Pedo! Children don't listen to DNIs! We should be protecting children from this degeneracy!
"Victim of proshipping" You are a victim of abuse/grooming, not proshipping... you do know that, right? It's important to me that you know that.
something that proshippers do that i wish they didn’t: defend their shipping, hobbies or interests to people that demand them to. in what world is it ok to go up to a person irl who’s wearing idk? band shirt? and demand them to explain why they like that band.
alongside this, EXPLAINING YOUR TRAUMA TO THEM? NO. you have nothing to defend! you do not need a justification!
just delete the anon, delete their messages, report and block them. ❤️
If a groomer uses proship content to groom someone, it is not proshippers fault. It is the groomers fault. Proshippers are not groomers, but some groomers are proship and use content to groom people. That does not mean the content shouldn't be made or shared. Groomers shouldn't exist, and most proshippers hate them, but we do not control other people's actions.
Sincerest apologies if you were groomed by a proshipper. But that does not mean all proshippers are groomers.
"i want more media with zero drama, no tension, and zero problematic characters and i am not joking"
Great! Here are my recommendations:
any of yall ever notice that antis cannot look at normal ass nonsexual artwork without immediately sexualizing it?
i remember once i saw something on tiktok. it was artwork of a father kind of spinning around playfully with his toddler/baby daughter. the daughter had blush on her face, you know, for shading and to show that she's alive.
and i remember antis calling it weird, sexual, predatory, etc. and somehow WE are the creeps..?? nuh uh. that is weirdo behavior.
he . 4teen🍖🌈, 🐰🎀i'm not the biggest fan of dark ships, but i won't harass those who are.
144 posts