Ppl Need To Realize That U Can't Be An Anti And Be Anti- Harassment Ur Jst A Proshipper

Counter-arguments against antis.

first, let me inform all of you so we're all on the same page.

Proshipper: one who believes other shouldnt be harassed for their ships. (proships dont exist.)

Profiction: one who believes other shouldnt be harassed over what fiction they consume.

Comshipper: one who ships complex ships.

Comship: non-pedophilic age gaps, interspecies, complex relationships that arent inherently abusive.

Darkshipper: one who ships dark ships.

Darkship: abusive relationships, pedophilic age-gaps, insect.

lolicon: one who is attracted to a young fictional girl.

shotacon: one who is attracted to a young fictional boy

we all on the same page? ok. also sybau if your not studying psychology and your trying to make it seem like being a proshipper is harmful to ones mind.

"shipping insect, pedophilic relationships, and such is **harmful** to people who were in that relationship, so therefore disrespectful and immoral!"

actually, it can be used as a coping mechanism for victims, why? because it can help them **cope** with what happened to them, by projecting on their favorite characters, it can help them think that whatever happened to them, their favorite fictional character has endured it too. essentially comforting them.

"if fiction doesnt affect reality, then why after jaws, everyone became scared of sharks?"

people were afraid of sharks even before the jaws movie..? sharks eat people.

also, if fiction does affect reality, would consuming gay media as a straight person make you gay? nope! does playing limbus company make you a train that eats people? does playing genshin make you mavuika?

now let me again use antis logicc.

yk how rape and sex trafficking victims often relate to characters like aventurine? by your logic, they cant anymore because it "harms them".

do you also know how groom victims relate to topaz because she was groomed by jade? they cant anymore because it "harms them".

another example, you now cant relate to ei (who is implied to have NPD) because you'll turn to a god that "abuses" her citizens?

what about sunday? he also was groomed by that big back eagle, now you cant relate to him because it "harms them" like ok

switching to other games, liking eula makes you a racist, liking klee makes you a terrorist, liking varesa makes you a food champion.

see the flawed logic?

"Proshipping is going to give children the idea that dating an adult is okay!" and then they go on to belittle kids for their fictional crush being their age or a bit younger, but not batting an eye when their fictional crush is way older than them.

Using an anti-shipper's logic against them

thinking about f/os experiencing cuteness aggression... f/os who will wake you up from a nap with cuddles and kisses because you were just too cute to not bother, f/os squealing as they hold you tightly like a teddy bear, f/os doing slightly annoying things throughout the day like ruffling your hair or poking your cheek because they just can't help themselves when it comes to you <3

right, but then try rewriting this with literally any other comparison between media and irl crime

villain fans when you say that liking fictional murder is just as bad as being a murderer in real life

like what do you find so attractive about fictional murder? if you wouldn't commit murder in real life and risk going to jail and everyone hating you then what makes it morally and socially acceptable to find fictional, murderous villains attractive?

they're literally the same as real murderers, the height, voices, looks/appearance, (kinda varies) the personality, and since y'all LOVE TO SAY THIS for some reason, cannibalism as a metaphor for love

this is exactly what i mean when i say all villain fans are or will become murderers one day whether they wanna admit it or not.

this is also the same logic that homophobes/transphobes use to censor lgbtq+ literature and media portrayals because reading and enjoying those things and seeing them normalized in the media will turn their kids gay and therefore rotten in their eyes.

shit, you play violent video games? you're gonna kill people someday! your favorite character is mean and has abused people? well i guess you're just gonna end up being like that person. it's not like you could ever know the difference between fiction and real life or have the self control and self awareness to separate the two, that's impossible. that doesn't exist actually, b-because... it just doesn't, okay!?

these people fail to understand that liking something in fiction does not immediately translate to you condoning it in real life or becoming that way. it is such a strange concept to them.

hi proshippers! reminder NAWT to click any links, they might be to grab ur ip, or to doxx u.

i am blogging this everyday

fuck. you.

yeah let’s just ignore real qualified therapists telling trauma victims they can cope without harm via fiction. everyone listen to some random dipshit on pinterest because the TOTALLY know more than anyone with years of education and experience

why r people so against minors reading and writing smut as if not everyone has read explicit material atleast once in their life before they reached adulthood

"Oh, it's because proshippers are so more violent than antis!" The average anti when they see something they don't like (they could just block them instead):

it sucks that people can't stand the idea of SA victims coping using fiction if it doesn't fit the criteria of being repulsed of any and all subjects related to said trauma. you can't cope if the incident is presented in a way that isn't explicitly horrible. if you find comfort in rewriting your trauma, you can't do that either because it has to be bad all the time. you can't redefine what your trauma means, you can't process it in the way you want to, you can't heal because you're "not doing it right."