Me Whenever I Find Anyone Who Ships My Rare Pair

1700's medical illustrators be like "hey boss can I put a rhinoceros behind this anotomically correct sketch of the human skeleton" and the boss be like "only for the books being published in these specific european countries" and then they high-five and go out for drinks

Im pansexual myself and they really aren’t that different to me either.

But the way I see it is that it differs from person to person, I’ve never been one to think that bi people can only be attracted to two genders. Bisexual is two or more But not all. You could be attracted to every gender but just not be into the idea of dating one and that would qualify you as bi. If you are attracted to all you would be pan.

I’ve definitely heard the same arguments about the difference between them as you, never really got them. I can understand where the pretentious-pan stereotype came from when hearing it sometimes. Certainly still don’t agree with it but, regardless. I’m glad you deleted the post and put up with this response (hopefully). Have a nice day!

Did you know that librarymlm is an ace exclusionist and that they believe bisexuality and pansexuality are the same? Just letting you know just in case since you reblogged their post.

it took me a moment to figure out which post you meant. i will delete it. 

however i wanna say as a trans bisexual myself i also dont feel like bisexuality and pansexuality are really all that different since nobody’s ever given me a definition of pansexuality that doesnt depend the belief bisexuality is not inclusive to trans and nonbinary genders - which is absolutely is - 

obvs if ppl wanna ID that way its valid. but since these two words describe the same attraction to multiple genders i dont want to accept “they are the same” as being a problematic belief unless im given some specific reason as to why

just wanted to clear that up. but i love my ace friends and prefer to avoid discourse and exclusionist drama anyway so i will delete on account of that

DEACON - liar, liar, plants for hire

FOLLOW MY ARTWORK | ADD ME ON STEAM

PSA to fan creators who don't have a lot of regular contact with children: They are almost always bigger than you think. A 1-year-old baby may already be walking. A toddler is likely already hip-high. A 10-year-old may already be taller than at least one of their parents. A 14/15 year old may already have reached their adult height.

Jeans!

WARNING!!! 

THIS CANDY IS NOT CANDY. IT IS DRUGS DISGUISED AS CANDY. IF ANYONE YOU KNOW CARRIES IT, TAKE THE CANDY AND THE POLICE OR THROW IT AWAY IMMEDIATELY. REBLOG TO SAVE A LIFE.

Just daydreaming about your stories or what you want to write truly is being productive despite what your brain demanding immediate results to and gratification from your productivity might tell you, like it lets you work through details, figure out what you want, rotate scenes around and change things up if you're still unsure about them, have a little fun without committing just quite yet, even if it's not being written down, it is being processed in your mind nonetheless and it is contributing to future productivity and the eventual endgame of wherever you want to be going with it all, even if you're not physically interacting with or creating or consuming something at the moment, you are creating thoughts, coming up with the blueprints, and maybe those blueprints won't always come to fruition, but maybe one day they'll help you build something great, or maybe they just brought you some joy or intrigue at the time and that's fine too, and etc, etc, so yeah, let yourself daydream more

Okay, this is in incredibly petty nitpick, but: if you’re writing a fantasy setting with same-sex marriage, a same-sex noble or royal couple typically would not have titles of the same rank - e.g., a prince and a prince, or two queens.

It depends on which system of ranking you use, of course (there are several), but in most systems there’s actually a rule covering this scenario: in the event that a consort’s courtesy title being of the same rank as their spouse’s would potentially create confusion over who holds the title by right and who by courtesy, the consort instead receives the next-highest title on the ladder.

So the husband of a prince would be a duke; the wife of a queen, a princess; and so forth.

(You actually see this rule in practice in the United Kingdom, albeit not in the context of a same-sex marriage; the Queen’s husband is styled a prince because if he were a king, folks might get confused about which of them was the reigning monarch.)

The only common situation where you’d expect to see, for example, two queens in the same marriage is if the reigning monarchs of two different realms married each other - and even then, you’d more likely end up with a complicated arrangement where each party is technically a princess of the other’s realm in addition to being queen of her own.

You’ve gotta keep it nice and unambiguous who’s actually in charge!

HOW TO HELP TORTURED GAY MEN IN CHECHNYA

We can’t allow this to continue. A petition has also been launched by change.org and signed by tens of thousands of people.

It demands a full investigation of all the facts and unlawful repression in Chechnya of the LGBT population and calls for punishment for the ‘guilty parties’ and the end to the practice of extra-judicial violence.

You can sign that here.

Instagram.com/WeTheUrban