Pandora Hearts fanart on 2025?????
obbbb ob god onbbbb
Briefly bringing back the sskk actors au to say:
Atsushi: It's of uttermost importance that we add a scene where vampire Akutagawa bites me Director: … It isn't? It would solve absolutely no plot purpose whatsoever? There's no need to? Atsushi, now with increased emphasis: It's of uttermost importance that we add a scene where vampire Akutagawa bites me. It's necessary and vital that we insert a scene where vampire Akutagawa bites me. It's fundamental to the show that we feature a scene where vampire Akutagawa bites me. The whole world is going to fall down if we don't include a scene where vampire Akutagawa bites me. My neck has to be bitten by vampire Akutagawa. Vampire Akutagawa's fangs have to be on my neck.
Illustration by anime character designer/animation director Chizuru Kobayashi from Pandora Hearts 24+1 Official Guide: Last Dance
Why can't we ever use bullshit bioessentialism for fun things
Penetration is a gender-neutral act. Topping is gender-neutral. Bottoming is gender-neutral. You are not more or less of a man or a woman depending on how you fuck. You are not “fake trans” for having sex a certain way. You are not any less masculine for bottoming or any less feminine for topping.
Make no mistake, the Palestinian resistance caused this. Just hours ago, they announced a successful operation against the IDF
Its operations like these that has made it difficult for the IDF to conduct a genocide in Gaza
Of course the biggest credit goes to the people of Northern Gaza who steadfastly refused for 16 months to let their land get colonised
A good thread on whether “queer” is a slur and if it should be used or not.
They’re too evil! - Redemption has nothing to do with how good or evil you were to begin with.
They don’t deserve it! - Redemption is not something that can be “deserved.”
Their actions are unforgivable! - Redemption has nothing to do with forgiveness.
It’s too late for them to change! - It is only “too late” to choose redemption when a character is dead (unless the scope of the story includes an afterlife in which change is possible).
It doesn’t fit the themes of the story.
They’re not an important enough character for showing the process of a redemption arc to be worthwhile.
They’re more interesting as a character who isn’t doing the right thing.
It’s more satisfying to let them keep being evil.
It makes it more satisfying when they die.
There’s probably more, but you get the idea.
Remember, redemption is when someone realizes they are wrong, and takes steps to doing the right thing. That is not something that can be “deserved,” it is not something that hinges on forgiveness, and it is not something that it is ever too late for! …Unless the person is dead or something.
Why did “be critical of your media” turn into “find all its flaws and hate it” why did people become allergic to FUN