Curate, connect, and discover
That Barbie Movie meme except it's my favorite trainwreck siblings
I mean, tall, brunette, smartass and magical
Hela: Father I want to keep fighting because that's all you taught me.
Odin: No. How dare you have so little regard for life exactly like me? Imprisoned and forgotten.
Thor: Father I tried to kill all the monsters just the way you taught me.
Odin: No. How dare you put Asgardian lives in danger and glorify war exactly like me? Banished and stripped of your power.
Loki: Father I could have killed all the monsters without endangering Asgardian lives to prove my loyalty to you!
Odin: No. How dare you think that's what I wanted when I raised you with racism against your own people? Rejected and driven to suicide.
Hela, Thor and Loki:
In celebration of pride month, Iâve decided to make a post of some of my favorite LGBT+ Avengers art! With credit to the artists, of course.
(if i credited the wrong person please tell me!)
@shop5
@marathecactupus
@younggenji
@saucehair
@umikochannart
@vivasharkart
@frogyghost
@portraitoftheoddity
@spidertams
Rating: 8.0 of 10
So, if you live on Planet Earth, you have probably read reviews/heard from other people about how amazing Thor: Ragnarok is.
Iâm not gonna be one of those people.
Alright, I donât think itâs terrible either. I just think Ragnarok is okay, and somewhat on par with other âokayâ Marvelâs Cinematic Universe (*cough* Ant-Man *cough*).
I could say that the one great thing about Ragnarok is that it has a lot of personality. The sin of previous Thor movies were that they were not only forgettable, they felt âcookie-cutterâ. They felt like youâve seen them before, and in fact you definitely have. Meanwhile, Ragnarok is definitely its own beast, and that is for sure thanks to Taika Waititiâs clear vision as director. His vision in infusing fun and humor is definitely something that Thor sorely needs. And that proved to work, as evidenced by its success both critically and commercially.
However, Taikaâs brand of humor is not my brand of humor. Because the story is quite thin, Ragnarok definitely hinges a lot on its humor. So if you like Taika (see What We Do In The Shadows) then I guess youâll like it, but if you donât get the laughs then you wonât enjoy it as much. Iâve always said that Marvel movies are always unexpectedly funny, but although there were laughs, they were not usually at the expense of the characters. However, Taika likes to make fun of his characters, to the point that he makes them look quite foolish. He probably was trying to make them more ârelatableâ or something, but for me, they just make me respect our heroes less.
The villain is played by none other than Cate Blanchett. Cate Blanchett just has that enormous movie presence that makes every movie better, but her character Hela was not given the gravity it deserves. Given that Hela is Thor and Lokiâs sister (and given what happened to their father Odin), Ragnarok is ripe for a real, emotional family story. But Ragnarok failed on that front. Sure, Ragnarok touches on that in one or two scenes, but they definitely were not enough. An emotional core like that should be ingrained in its story, but instead it just felt tacked on. Just because Ragnarok is a funny movie, that doesnât excuse the lack of heart in this film. Just look at Guardians Of The Galaxy Vol. 2. That movie was funny as hell, but the emotional content of that movie was through the roof. Sadly Ragnarok couldnât do anything like that, instead Hela just felt like another Malekith (villain from Thor: The Dark World, if you donât remember, who was not that good of a villain to begin with).
Ragnarok, though, definitely plays on Chris Hemsworthâs strength. Hemsworth is an incredible comedic actor, and he fits right in this new tone. I couldnât grasp much of Hulk/Bruce Bannerâs character in this movie, mainly because in-universe we have not seen him for 2 years. He has changed a lot but we were not given time to revisit his character more. Tessa Thompson as Valkyrie though, is really great! She is badass and memorable, and is definitely a worthy addition to MCU family. About Loki⌠I canât believe Iâm gonna say this, but I do think that Lokiâs character has definitely run its course. Unless something happens to the character that changes him, I canât see how Loki could add value to future Marvel movies.
TL;DR If you need some laughs, or you have 2 hours to kill, Thor: Ragnarok is definitely a great movie. But if youâre looking for something more emotionally profound, youâre not gonna get it here.
(click on the image for a better image quality)
loki + callback scenes
So...letâs talk about Hela, shall we?
We all know that sheâs basically a version of Baldur. Odinâs first born, perfect golden son. The blessed child of Odin and Frigg, but Iâm thinking Frigga in the MCU never wouldâve allowed Hela to grow up the way she did...
My theory is that Hela is the daughter of Odin and Freya, who was likely Odinâs first wife in the MCU who died at some point before Hela was locked away and he met Frigga, etc. I think that Freya loved her âperfect daughterâ so much that he cursed her the same way she did Baldur in Norse Mythology. Making him immune to all things with only a single loophole left out, being mistletoe.
Odin likely wouldâve made up the loophole just in case, because he was obviously paranoid about everything down to his own childrenâs intentions. Though, because of his love for her, he chose mistletoe because of its poisonous nature. If he suspected any sign of madness, or she committed an atrocity, he couldâve just poisoned her food or drink and let her die peacefully in her sleep. A merciful death to spare himself the act of having to kill her with his own hands, but when she inevitably grew bloodthirsty, he still couldnât kill his own child (just as he couldnât kill Loki) and locked her away in a prison all her own (much like how Loki was locked away in Mythology with Sigyn protecting him from the venom dripping serpent.)
My thoughts on what mightâve happened to her if she were poisoned could go one of two ways. She either wouldâve died as any human would, or the spell keeping her invulnerable wouldâve been broken and she quite possibly wouldâve reverted to the âperfect golden childâ that Freya was trying to protect. Meaning, blonde like Odin with creamy skin rather than pale and quite possibly less insane, because she would finally be able to feel again. Pain, anguish, all of it. Sheâd be normal just like every other Asgardian for the first time since she was a small child and it would be quite the humbling shock to go from this:
To this:
Because of one teeny, tiny little plant probably mentioned in Human legend in the MCU by Odin as a warning, should she ever return/escape upon his death or for some other reason.
Just thought this might be an interesting idea for any of you out there trying to figure out how to write a Hela x Reader fic without getting stuck.
I hate how many people look at Loki (especially with a post-Marvel lens) and act like the Christian writers turned him from a generally heroic gender-fluid god into a Satan-esque villain. Itâs like these people only read the parts of the myths that support this claim and then ignore every other myth that Loki is in.
First off with the gender-fluid stuff, he only turns into a female three or four times (one of them is theorized to be Loki but never outright confirmed). All of these times are a different race (Horse, Aesir, Jotun), and all situational. The horse is to lure away Svadilfari and stop the builder from finishing Asgardâs wall , the Aesir (never stated what race his is here) is to accompany Thor as his bridesmaid to make sure the plan works (and probably watch Thor be embarrassed by the dress heâs wearing) (Ărymskviða), another as the Aesir to learn about Baldurâs weakness to mistletoe, and the final one is to stop Baldur from coming back to life after Loki got him killed. Iâm pretty sure Loki turns into a bird more often. Finally in the Lokasenna, he and Odin insult each other for doing unwomanly things, Odin doing magic and Loki giving birth to children (yes plural), and then Frigg (or Freyja) pretty much tells them to leave their skeletons in the closets.
Secondly, there is a post Iâve seen a couple times (and it is what inspired me to make this post) by @incorrectnorse-quotes where they got a message saying Loki is a faithful husband. The problem with this is that it forgets that Angrboda exists. Loki has had sex with three people that with children coming from them, and he claims a fourth. The three he has children from are; Svadilfari (Sleipnir), Angrboda (Fenrir, Hel(a), and Jormungandr), and his wife Sigyn (Vali and Narfi). He (and Odin at one point) claims to have had sex with Thorâs wife Sif. That claim is said by Loki during the Lokasenna, after Sif says he canât say anything bad about her.
Finally while I agree that he isnât the devil figure some make him out to be, he definitely isnât what I would consider a good person (some people seem to think he is the nicest person in Asgard). For example, he once completely plucked out a womanâs (Sifâs) hair, for no given reason (an event which led to the creation of Mjolnir). Another example is the murder of Baldur (which we are probably missing some context to, but Iâm working off the context we have), where he gets Baldur killed for âcomplaining about nightmares of his death.â My final example comes from the Lokasenna again, where the entire story is âLoki crashes a party, uses an old oath to stop from getting kicked out, insults almost everyone at the party (except Thor), admits to killing Baldur, then leaves.â
Also Iâm not sure what version of the builder myth OSP was using, but in the version I'm familiar with the Aesir only agree to a deal with the builder (after shorting his time from three seasons to one) because of Lokiâs advice, which is why they have him fix the problem.
All things considered, Loki seems to be Asgardâs resident asshole and occasional problem solver.
For a more in depth look Iâd recommend this essay by Reddit user u/rockstarpirate, where he talks also about Norse gender views. (Warning itâs 21 pages)
First off, it feels like most people see that Snorri Sturluson was Christian and immediately assume he did what the Irish monks did to Irish mythology. This completely ignores why he wrote the myths down, which was to establish a cultural connection between Iceland and Norway, in order to try and get Iceland to join the Kingdom of Norway (which failed). It also ignores that fact that he WASNâT A MONK. Outside of a part about the Aesir being Trojans and living in Asia (which makes no sense when looking at the rest of the Edda and the myths within), and some stuff about some great god who is more powerful than all of the Aesir and is never actually named, there isnât much evidence to there being large post-Christian changes.
The second problem is that the theory focuses too much on Loki. He doesnât do much during RagnarĂśk. He captains a ship (whatever that meant to the Norse) and he kills/dies to Heimdallr. Each of his kids from Angrboda does more. Fenrir eats Odin, and in some versions also the sun, moon, and stars. Jormungandr floods Midgard and poisons the sky, along with killing the strongest of the Aesir, Thor. Hel(a) brings an army of Draugr from her realm to fight Odin and Freyaâs einherjar (Freya got half of those who died in battle). I agree that RagnarĂśk is a story of revenge, but its not Lokiâs. ITS THE JOTNARâS REVENGE. Revenge for a long list of insults and grievances that started with the killing of Ymir during the Voluspa by Odin and his brothers. Also, both Fenrir and Jormungandr are getting revenge against the gods they hate most, whom they are stated to kill. In the end Surtr, king of Muspelheim, kills Freyr, destroys Asgard, and burns all of the worlds (which since they are made of Ymirâs corpse, make this technically Ymirâs funeral pyre). Also the Jotnar on Lokiâs ship arenât his troops, they are led by a different Jotun, and it isnât even his ship.
I could do an entire other post on the problems with how Loki gets viewed through modern lenses, and Iâm tempted to.
(*´âď˝)ďž