The Bridgertons - Blog Posts

Oh Eloise you are willing to change the world ? But you couldn't help a girl out of a wedding with an old man ?

This writing is inconsistent and bad

“Pen I'm so grateful for what you have done for me”

And what exactly did Penelope do for Eloise ?!? Talk shit about her before even thinking about telling it to her ?!? Wtf is this writing

Eloise was literally like that in part one

And you're going to tell me that in the laps of one or two episodes she doesn't eveb bother to listen to Cressida telling her that a 70y old man wants to marry her ? That the friendship was “falling appart" ?!?

I can't bring myself to watch the last two episodes

I didn't even watch a full episode and WTF ?!? ELOISE ?!? YOUR NEW BFF IS TELLING YOU THAT SHE'S GOING TO GET ENGAGED TO A GRANDPA ?!? Why aren't you doing anything ?!?

Like that is character assassination

I haven't got to watch part 2 of Bridgerton but oh boy what I'm seeing.

Please free my girl Eloise from the Bridgerton writer RIGHT NOW.

Hear me out

The younger Bridgerton could be neurodivergent. Eloise ? Impulsivity can be an hyperactive trait plus the fact that she has hard time focusing on thing she doesn't like ? It could be her personality or adhd. Francesca ? I don't think I need to say more.

Hyacinth and Gregory ?

They are really giving me the vibe. Well way more Hyacinth than Gregory honestly but still.

I feel like not enough people dislike Bridgerton's love interest because they're sex offenders. Like there's no essays to do about whether you like the ship or not, or even if the ship had a great chemistry. The characters are sexes offenders, or think like one, and most barely feels bad about it.

Bridgerton rewrite:

Here will be the link to every canon stuff of my rewritr au :

The Ton

Benedict

X

The Ton in the Bridgertons

We do not see much politics in the Bridgertons but as sexism exist you cannot brush over or make racism disapear in what 40 years ? I try to be sensible about but as I am a white individual I might make mistake and apologise if so and will correct it.

At first we would still keep the same hierarchy of power than the one in real life and, I assume, in the show.

Secondly let's talk about THE thing that changes everything in the Bridgertons : the Great experiment.

The Great experiment appeared for the same reason than show in Queen Charlotte but it's a bit more subtle. It was introduced mostly so Charlotte could marry the king George but never did the royal councils intended to actually give more power to the "other side" of the society. Even if people could now get invited and participate in activity didn't mean they'd be invited or treated well.

Queen Charlotte is actually the one who shacked things up, after mostly focusing on her marriage at first she slowly woke up and saw that despise what was said her own were still being rejected and treaded unfairly. By attending Lady Danbury ball, she shoke things up. When some titles were left without any heir she would think first of giving it to the "other side" (that's how Simon's dad became Duke) etc.

Even thought the Queen Charlotte promoted tolerance things didn't completely work out that way. The "original" Ton felt jealous and left alone and while they couldn't reject the other side at the more little scandal possible they would directly reject a familly. And while young did marry racized Lord it was almost UNFATHOMABLE that an eligible white Lord would marry a girl of colour. It got a little better but there is still a lot of pression on racized people. A few Lord did actually mary girls from the "other side" the most known one being St-Clair, Abernathy and the Sterlings leaving a lot of preassure on their children because they represent this new kind of union and must be perfect. So it is a big deal that so many of the Bridgertons will have union with people of the other side as they are one of the most old and respected familly.