Curate, connect, and discover
Controversy - Blog Posts
First, I go through this logic. I imagine the world without pedophilea, is this world any different? Is this world any better? Are the people more moral? Do they help each other with no benefit for their own soul?
No.
Then, let's go farther, the wrold without death, the world without weapons... Bla Bla Bla. Will people not find ways to hurt each other? If after the people are traumatized, they no longer make coherent cynical decisions, then wouldn't that be possible that pedophilea is not bad either? In the world as it is I really advocate for wokism, fort he way for trash to wake up. I want them to be wokne up. If you are moral solely because of random bias subjectively that you've encountered, my sword or anyone's sword is moral and justice, I cannot imagine the world without pedos as they will be replaced by the very ones who hated them, as their jealousy is shown true color.
Weird Earthworm Jim fact
Initially Earthworm Jim began as a maggot character.
At this point he didn't have the Jim part of the name.
Years later when this information was leaked online,
people who'd joined the development project AFTER the change
tried to call out the person who leaked the info as a liar
only for the original character creator to confirm it as true
and to this day some people still believe the maggot story to be a lie.
The reason for the change is even more bizarre
apparently the character creator got into a heated argument
with some random other guy not connected to the project at all
the subject being what the difference was between
maggots
and gnat larvae.
after that the character was changed to an earthworm.
nobody is really sure who won that argument.
but changing the character to an earthworm removed the issue.
You guys still asking about this guy? I can help.
The artist in question had two accounts.
Well, two that a relevant to our story at least.
One account was very open and honest.
Case and point.
The other was delusional as hell.
Surprisingly not the one we're talking about here.
The devil's playdoh enjoyer received a lot of hate.
Eventually people they knew in real life found out.
They tried to intervene and the results were complicated.
Not only did it not solve the issue,
It tore the family apart and they became isolated.
Now that second account starts to become relevant.
On their more delusional persona they had a successful following.
They were pretending to be a woman addicted to sex so duh.
On this account however the furries absolutely loved them.
Mostly because they made a furry dating sim with good graphics.
Eventually hey just started focussing more on this persona.
Not wanting to alienate their fans they kept the brown a secret.
After a long time of it being too awkward to do their regular thing,
They just stopped the whole scatplay idea all together.
They promised themselves to go back to it but never had the time.
All the attention they now had removed any chance.
When the hype died down they realised they'd grown out of it.
They still liked to dream about the concept,
But had lost interest in doing scat IRL.
That's where we are today.
This still draw art of the analvore though.
Now on a new third account.
And by the way fella.
I know you're reding this.
Yes we can track your activity even when you have a VPN.
Don't try to cancel us again.
Do you really want us to expose you?
Because we will,
If you try to attack us for fear of exposure.
Ironic isn't it.
Leave us alone and we'll leave you alone.
Understand?
Why did I just found out today that the reason why Get Schooled/True Education was taken off Webtoon was because it got into a huge controversy?!??! What do you mean the recent chapters have been racist?!?! What was the creator even thinking?!?! 😭😭😭😭
Like, I was so shocked when it suddenly got taken off Webtoon a few months ago and didn't even know why it got taken off until now. Like wtf?!?!? Like the chapter was about to tackle racism and discrimination but apparently it dealt it in a horrible way, and basically made one guy say the n word!? I would have assume it was a racist guy bullying the black guy but apparently it was reversed racism, where a korean guy was actually the one being bullied by the black guy? Idk, it's just what I have read and the who said the n word was the one being bullied? Like what? Now, idk really but it's just what I have read.
It sucks really, I wish the creator could have not made it that way. And took inspiration from black people or blasian or southeast asian people experience living in korea especially in school. that just sucks :/
Controversial Post
Good morning, afternoon, or evening to those reading this.
This will be a controversial post, so please grab your pitchforks and hold on to your keyboards.
Many people like to point out fictional characters that many viewers idolize, despite the creators pointing out that said characters are not good role models. The most mentioned characters are Don Draper from Mad Men, Walter White from Breaking Bad, and The Joker from Joker.
However, movies and TV shows about middle-aged men are not the only sources of media that feature characters who are poor role models but receive a lot of worship from fandoms.(please excuse my use of passive voice). Many Disney films and TV shows, which are typically about high school and college-aged girls, feature main or supporting characters who are poor role models but are idolized by their fandoms. These are broad statements, so I will not name names. I am solely generalizing.
This was inspired by @dani-luminae 's post comparing Mal Bertha and Elsa of Arendelle. I recently re-blogged the post.
The majority of the featured characters are from films, but a few are from TV shows and TV movies. If you would like to add any more, please do so by replying or re-blogging.
At the top of my head, I have listed Mal and Audrey from the Descendants franchise.
Next, jumping to the Encanto fandom is Isabela Madrigal and maybe(emphasizing maybe) Dolores Madrigal.
So much collateral damage. Thankfully this scene takes place in a small town(nothing against small towns. I am from a small town myself), and if it took place in an urban area, the scene would look like the aftermath of an Avengers movie.
Lastly, since this post is getting too long, is another magical big sister, Elsa of Arendelle from Frozen(Same w/ the girlies from Encanto above: being a bad sister, plus, and mainly, collateral damage).
Yes, all of the ladies I mentioned above are b*d*ss*s, and do display some positive personality traits and engage in prosocial behaviors. However, despite that, they are not good role models in universe, as IRL, they would be felons, and their family members and friends may limit contact with them.
There is nothing wrong with sympathizing with any of the characters above. There is nothing wrong with relating to the characters above. There is nothing wrong with liking the characters above. However, you can sympathize with, relate to, or even like the characters above while simultaneously recognizing them as poor role models in universe and IRL.
Thank you for taking the time out of your day or night to read my very controversial post, and please be kind and polite in your replies and re-blogs.
To anyone who read my entire blog post, and have a great day or night.
Hypocrisies of social justice movements:
- Advocate free thinking and intellectual curiosity, but frequently engage in intellectual dishonesty and censorship when it disagrees w/ their prerogative
- "Freedom of speech for me but not for thee"
- Denounce dehumanization, but commit it frequently when people are "canceled"
- Claim to value the ability of discomfort to help people learn/change, but frequently defame ("cancel") individuals whose arguments make them uncomfortable, regardless of how realistic those arguments might be
- Use character assassination and censorship to have their way, no matter that this directly contradicts their principles of social justice
- Accept little to no criticism, despite criticizing endlessly
- Advocate 'embracing diversity,' but will dismiss/denounce/defame/demonize those who acknowledge differences and who insist that such differences should not be overlooked, and should instead be honored
- Appoint themselves the arbitrary arbiters of right and wrong: judge, jury, and executioner on every issue
They do all of this in the name of social justice
I appreciate what these movements are trying to achieve. But the lack of situational/self-awareness in them is astounding. They are isolating themselves in an echo chamber. They are losing people.
PIANOSAURUS COULD RETURN IN CHAPTER 5?
So, I know what you’re all thinking: “But we saw him get brutally eaten by Doey—how on earth is he still alive?”
Well, in the new Patch 6, they’ve changed Pianosaurus’s size to a smaller version, which means the bigger bodies version could still be alive.
I reckon the reason they altered the size is due to the controversy surrounding Pianosaurus’s screen time.
Anyway, it’s just a theory,A POPPY THEORY!
Poppy playtime chapter 4 was kinda good
So I noticed people saying that chapter 4 of poppy playtime is buggy and bad.
I say they should have tried (like they literally kill pianosaurus in 1 minute and everyone knew Ollie was the prototype) and make it better (even though I liked that huggy was back).
I hope mob finds a solution and makes chapter 5 a great finale(or in chapter 6)
Edit: i forgot to say that , in my opinion, i think is a 8/10
So part of the “Joshscorcher was grooming ink rose” narrative also came from a YouTuber called essence of thought who made a video on Lily orchard and her trying to ship Josh and ink rose together
You can watch the video here
However I want focus what she has to say about Josh and Ink rose because her evidence for Josh actually grooming ink rose is that Josh’s role playing oc firebrand dated ink rose’s role playing oc and when Josh himself married Ari his oc got married to her oc so that means Josh must have actually dated ink rose in real life
Okay so show of hands if you agree that this line of logic is f@cking stupid
Yeah... there's no way in Hell that Alex is going to recover from this.
Alex is gonna make a video. When it comes out I'm gonna post my thoughts here.
Honestly regardless if it's true or not, it's gonna be a fucked up situation.
If it's true then a person I and many others looked up to is a massive piece of shit
If it's false then a group of deranged lunatics decided to screw someone's life over and make the fight of actual SA victims even harder
Crazy to think Kung Fu Panda 4 has already aged worse in six months than the first three movies have in 8-16 years.
It is not a swap, the ai is trained to add textures and craters on top of the moon like all phones do to enhance photos, I am sick of telling people this, please watch mrwhosetheboss and MKBHD's videos on this. Please use your goddamn brains. Hell, you can go in settings and turn it off. Either the OP loves misinformation or they can't read.
I haven't seen it get mentioned on Tumblr yet but Samsung has just gotten caught in a hilarious scam: they apparently advertised how their latest phones can take great picture of the moon, compared to other phones!
But it turns out they aren't using machine-learning to clear up blurry pictures, they're using machine-learning to detect when you're taking a picture of the moon, and then they swap in a saved PNG file of the moon.
A reddit user figured this out by taking a photo of the moon from Wikipedia, blurring it in photoshop, then trying to photograph it from across the room with all the lights turned out.
Their Samsung phone somehow managed to "clear up" the blurriness and recover details that weren't there in the first place. Because it's just cheating.
Does McLean Hospital Have Ties To MK Ultra?
Claims made, the evidence, the known facts, and the falsehoods.
CW/Brief: This talks about a government ran mind control project that took place in 1953-1973. Claims recently have resurfaced as a reaction to a contentious video that was released. This video was greatly contested by people with DID and professionals in psychiatry and psychology alike for it's poor handling of subject material and violation of ethics. This will not go fully in depth on the tactics used but addresses more recent claims about the hospital that originally hosted this video. There will be usage of words like torture. This also will mention a prolific case where the victim ended up becoming a terrible person- murder may be mentioned. This case was only brought up due to its prolific nature.
READ AT YOUR OWN RISK
Terminology used
RAMCOA: A specific subset of purposeful abuse, known to primarily be done by groups. Ritual Abuse, Mind Control, and Organized Abuse.
TBMC: Trauma/Torture Based Mind Control.
Mk-Ultra: A government run CIA project/operation meant to try and mind control agents and civilians alike. This has heavy ties to TBMC.
Syscourse: System based discourse that tends to happen surrounding plurality or multiplicity (a self-schema) and DID/OSDD-1 a dissociative disorder that often has the Alters be highly focused upon. Syscourse usually culminates in fights between those with "endogenic plurality" and "CDDs" (CDDs are known as Complex Dissociative Disorders) we engage in this on our main and mention it as it does tie into the sorts of reasons the claims surfaced recently.
TLDR; There are possible and reasonable claims that McLean plausibly could have had a hand in Mk-Ultra in the past. It is fact that they have ties to Mk-Ultra, by association with Harvard Medical. The ties do not by any means implicate them in any form of guilt. There is no evidence that McLean for certain ever had any involvement in the past, however it is plausible. There is absolutely NO reason to suspect the hospital currently in the year of 2023, fifty years after the project (if they even had any hand in it), has been closed. The resurfacing of this discussion happened due to victims of similar experiences (TBMC/RAMCOA) becoming triggered by the aforementioned video and finding this information out and not doing their due diligence to handle any of it with the care it deserves. This was not the time to bring this up, this is a separate discussion that should have never been tied to the video. The current way the claims and accusations are being handled and the fear mongering is a net negative both for this discussion and for causing unnecessary distrust in doctors who are there to genuinely help. Additionally there are false claims mixed in with the true ones, such as the claim that McLean continued to partake in horrific experiments until 1987, which has no source other than a known conspiracy theorist.
Full Post
We were planning to stay fully out of syscourse for a little while but seeing as things/discussions for RAMCOA got crosstagged as syscourse we ended up running into something that we want to thoroughly stamp out the idea of. To preface this, yes, we are a RAMCOA survivor. The full details we have stated ever are very minimal, we are purposefully hiding a shit ton of things. However what remains is the fact we are a victim of TBMC, our RAMCOA was more focused upon MC than any other aspect. As such we took a very specific interest in this situation. Feel free to tag this post as syscourse if you want, we do not consider it such ourselves as this pertains directly to a type of trauma.
There is actually a loose connection to be made between McLean hospital and MK-Ultra. McLean Hospital had ties to Harvard Medical, which has been purportedly linked to MK-Ultra. The one declassified governmental mind control project.
This dates back all the way to 1977, this is not the only claim of Harvard's involvement either. In fact anyone who is morbidly curious may know of a famous case very, very well. Theodore Kaczynski, otherwise known as the Unabomber. It is a known fact that this man was a victim of MK Ultra and experimentation by Harvard. This has been known for a very long time.
To be clear TBMC does not excuse murder. We as a survivor of TBMC ourselves are not a danger, however it must be recognized that in some cases people are not criminally responsible due to their mental functionality. This is similar to a case where someone pleads insanity- the actions are heinous and still were UNDENIABLY his doing. We are not saying he should not be blamed, nor are we making light of his victims. Explanations are not excuses.
Some minimal sources.
These are only one of many many articles, videos, deep dives, and talks about this situation and the irreparable damage that the way human experimentation in the USA has messed people up in more recent times.
If you had any awareness of the general situation surrounding these things you would realize the claims are predicated upon a long standing history of Harvard Medical specifically having definitive ties and accusations to ties with MK-Ultra. The accusations have not arisen out of thin air, this isn't a new claim, this has been brought up numerous times in the past. These claims came well before the current issue surrounding one man's horrendous presentation on DID- the DSM-4 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual 4th Edition) even was made after accusations of Harvard Medical being tied to Mk-Ultra.
Harvard Medical spawned McLean Hospital
People are making an association and are wondering if this was one of the ways that Harvard Medical along with the CIA accessed victims. This wonder does however have no definitive answers from what we can gather and should not be treated as fact.
Additionally many people have reasonable and not unfounded fears that said practices never truly stopped. However, these for the current day and year, 2023 are unfounded claims. A reasonable fear or reasonable feeling still does not always denote truth in what is feared. It is reasonable for us to fear the Christian faith given our history, however it factually is not pure evil and can be practiced healthily. (Not a great comparison but we had to think of something)
The debunked accusations of specifically McLean hospital being involved was from 1987 in which a conspiracy theorist claimed McLean was still doing these horrific experiments and tortures. The thing that was disproven was that they had continued to be involved, not that they had never been involved. To our understand the difference in these two cases is that there is numerous possible claims that McLean may have been involved in the past but only one which claimed this from a very untrustworthy source.
There is currently no evidence to prove they were not involved. However there is also seemingly no evidence to prove Mclean Hospital were involved as well. Due to the connections in administration in that time period, it is reasonable to conclude that it is plausible that Mclean did contribute all the way back when MK-Ultra was active, just as much as it is reasonable to conclude it is plausible they did not.
Does this mean it should be treated as fact? No. But the RAMCOA survivors who immediately learn of these connections and assume the worst are having a reasonable emotional reaction when paired with what RAMCOA survivors like us have experienced. The feelings are reasonable, but the fact of the matter in many cases just seems to not be there.
By denying the plausibility you are plausibly denying the experience of victims who are still alive to this day. As such many people (us included) still feel weird about definitively saying that there is no chance this happened in the past. However we must be fully aware and acknowledge that there is not enough evidence of this being the case, therefore it is wrong from a factual point to say that they were involved.
Again, does this reflect the modern day?
Absolutely not. I would say that to our knowledge the majority of doctors at the hospital who are (especially) younger than their 50 are not involved nor should be implicated. Anyone who was a child when Mk-Ultra launched and/or concluded should be automatically removed from a list of possible perpetrators. Additionally it will only harm what we do believe could be good doctors who had no idea of these things, many people today are far removed from things like Mk-Ultra, many if not most may have had no awareness of the past allegations.
You can address the fact that worries or claims that McLean Hospital or Harvard Medical today are doing this as false, without fully denying the plausibility of a dark past. Especially when it comes to Harvard Medical.
(Side note, just because something came form another organization does not necessarily mean they did the same practices. Additionally, I would argue, given the history of government projects only those directly involved with the experimentation would be aware of what was occurring and not all workers even within the hospital).
We took it upon ourselves to look into it initially- we already knew about the Unabomber being an Mk-Ultra victim, we only recently knew he had ties to Harvard Medical. And yes, we have found a few claims that the specific hospital he was put in when tortured was McLean, but those have only been on articles that require one to sign up or buy fully access which we are not doing.
Please just try and understand why some RAMCOA survivors have reacted the way they have, do more than just look on reddit or see that one lunatic claiming McLean was continuing on Mk-Ultra in 1987. Because what many are doing is resorting to a long time form of systemic oppression against RAMCOA survivors. The default of calling all of them delusional and conspiracy theorists. It is not delusion to see something so similar to your experience and make a connect even if it is faulty, delusion is another mental health issue entirely.
Acknowledge how things can be emotional reactions, while also acknowledging the bits of truth within those reactions. We do not think that this being brought up in response to specifically the DID video is good- we think it creates fear and leads to fear mongering about hospitals and doctors. This is something that should be brought up and addressed in its own right. But the timing was poor, and the reasons behind it were filled and fueled with people who were triggered in a variety of ways and were not actually discussing it out of concern for the victims. (We are usually not big on what the motivations behind something are but when your motivations end up seeping through and possibly harming an important discussion it does become a concern.)