Curate, connect, and discover
Mbti - Blog Posts
I can’t believe people don’t know how cognitive functions work
Ti=titanium
Te=tellurium
Ne=neon
Ni=nickel
Se=selenium
Si=silicon
Fe=iron
Fi=...Fi
so if you’re INTJ your stacking is Nickel Tellurium Fi Selenium
Get it right people
possible enneagram combinations for the NTs (satire)(offensive)(Pdb be like)
INTJ:
1-INTJs can't be ones cause Si-less (Si=1)
2-INTJs can't be 2s because everyone knows INTJs don't feel emotions 🤓🤓
3-nooooo Ni doms can't be 3s they cannot possibly properly socialize with other homo sapiens
4-Too much Te (4s can only be IxFPs)(4s love to cry and INTJs are incapable of tears)
5-only Sp5 and So5 (being a Sx type indicates that the type has bitches and every INTJ is an incel who lives in their mom's basement)
6-sure why not (not Sp6 because it is too soft and weak and INTJs are emo badasses)
7-Not possible because INTJs hate parties
8-Se-less 💀 (Se=8 according to my uncle)
9-INTJs are not doormats therefore no (an INTJ online started yelling at me because I threatened to call the fbi to accuse them of having an iq below 300)
INTP:
1-not possible, INTPs have no productivity (somehow 1=procrastination-less) (in my experience INTPs never make their bed after they wake up)
2-No Fe 💀 therefore no 2 (INTPs don't know how to bake cookies and all 2s love sugar cookies)
3-INTPs have no ambition or social skills (lack of Te 💀) therefore they are un-3 (INTPs don't even have the ambition to get up from bed)
4-nooo 4 is Fi not Ti 😡😡
5-Only Sp5 (INTPs cannot be social types since social types can properly communicate with human beings and Sx5s have bitches)
6-INTPs are too 200 iq and all 6s are npc henchmen of 8w7
7-INTPs are too 🤓
8-INTPs are too 🤓
9-They overthink too much therefore they not 9 (9s are head empty and the only words they say are: I'm tired and I'm fine either way)
ENTJ:
1-yes cuz ENTJ yell (no Sp1)
2-no cuz ENTJ yell
3-ENTJ intensifies (no Sx3 because female energy 🤢🤮🤢)
4-nooooo ENTJs are Fi-less (ENTJs only have emotions because their zeal is powered by the tears of 4s)
5-nooooo ENTJs have no Ti and Te is too dumb and Ti is 500 iq and 5s cannot be stupid
6-ENTJs don’t focus on danger, they focus on ta grindset 😎💪
7-ENTJs are too sane to be 7s
8-ummm actually Te doms can't be 8s only Se doms can be 8s cause Te doms are just E1 and E3 karens trying to be cool 🤓🤓🤓
9-ENTJs are NOT submissive and breedable hence it is impossible for them to be 9s
ENTP:
1-no Si therefore not 1 (ENTPs hate it when the government threatens them for doing whatever the fuck they want)
2-all ENTPs are chaos demons therefore they can't be 2s (2s are too kind and innocent to commit several acts of first degree murder)
3-only So3 (ENTP is too lazy for Sp3 and too mean to be Sx3)
4-no Fi no 4 💀
5-ENTPs are E types and all 5s are hermits (being an E type indicates that the type touches grass dayly and that is 100% contradictory to 5s)
6-ENTPs never worry (from my mother's friend's cousin's brother's personal experience with his ENTP friend)
7-only Sp7 7w8 (7w6, So7 and Sx7s are too angelic. ENTPs love arson)
8-no Se no chadness 💀
9-all ENTPs are peace-breakers (one broke into my house and asked for Vbucks) therefore they are not 9s
simple (?) definitions of the functions
Edit: I made some changes (they are in italics)
Without a basic knowledge of the cognitive functions, it can be extremely hard to understand mbti. Here are the simplified definitions of the functions:
Ne (extroverted intuition): this function spreads intuition/ideas externally. The main thing Ne values is possibility. Ne wants to understand the dozens of ideas that stem from one event. It does not like to stick to one idea.
ex: when it sees a flower, it comes up with dozens of flower designs of its own. It thinks of all the possibility the flower can look like, thought Ne does not care if it is practical (or considered a “good” idea).
Ni (introverted intuition): this function forges an intuitive idea internally. Ni takes information in and thinks of one idea, one insight, on possibility. Like Ne, Ni is focused on what might be possible, not on what is tangible. It wants to dive deeper into the “truth” to find a secret meaning/contradiction.
Ex: when it sees dozens of flowers, it comes up with its own design of a flower. Unlike Ne, Ni takes its time to analyze the depth of one specific idea. Ne does not care much about the accuracy and worth of its ideas (it values possibilities more), while Ni wants its idea to be valuable.
Se (extroverted sensing): this function is focused on the external physical world around it. Se is focused on the present and what is happening in the moment. Like Si, it is focused on the small tangible details. Se is a fairly direct and objective function. It does not like to meddle with hypotheticals and theories (this does not mean Se is unintellectual). This function is a kinesthetic learner and likes to meddle with its environment.
Ex: when it sees a flower, it simply, well, sees it. It's a concrete object that has no other poetic meaning to it.
Si (introverted sensing): this function is focused on the real world in its head/internally. Si is oriented towards the past, towards repetition. It makes decisions based on how similar events in the past enrolled. Si values predictability (not necessarily tradition).
Ex: when it sees a flower, it remembers how the flower connects to past sensory details and it stores the details of the flower in its head for further use in the future.
Fi (introverted feeling): this function is focused on its own internal moral code/philosophy. It makes decisions based on how moral the situation is based on its own feelings and values. Fi is often seen as the function that wants to be authentic because it is concerned if the current situation/its decision aligns with its personal values.
Ex: when Fi gives gifts to other people, it contemplates on what gift it would like/value. Fi also analyzes how the gift would be valuable according to the person’s inner feelings and beliefs.
Fe (extroverted feeling): this function is focused on the external moral code. It is concerned if its actions align with external beliefs and ethnics. Fe makes decisions based on what the majority values. It is aware of how its actions will impact/meddle with the emotional state of other people*. Unlike Fi, Fe believes ethics are not decided by itself. Fe is objective, like Te.
*Though other functions might have this ability, Fe knows how other people feel on a “deeper level” and it is confident in its ability to do so (just like how Fi is confident in its ability to analyze its own beliefs). For example, Te might be able to analyze emotions on a surface level, but it has trouble understanding the emotions of others on an in-depth level. Plus, Te is not concerned with the emotional environment.*
Ex: when Fe gives gifts to other people, it gives gifts based on what the majority believes is the best gift.
Ti (introverted thinking): this function is focused on the logical world internally. It forges its own logical claims, reasoning and conclusions. Ti is mainly concerned with the internal consistency and analysis of one thing, rather than external evidence that supports it. Inductive reasoning. “The ball will fall because I’ve seen the same ball fall down multiple times, therefore it will fall down this time.” Ti cannot understand how one thing can contradict its own “rule”.
Ex: when Ti gives gifts, it forms an analysis on what gift would be the most beneficial based on the patterns and observations it witnesses.
Te (extroverted thinking): this function is focused on the external world of logic. It is focused on data, evidence and facts from the outside world. It is focused on if something is practical/aligns with external rules and principles. It analyzes things based on how it relates to similar external logical principles. “This ball will fall because I’ve seen other rubber balls like this fall, so it is logical to assume that this one will fall.” Deductive reasoning. Te cannot understand how one thing can contradict the “universal rule”.
Ex: when Te gives gifts, it analyzes what is the most beneficial gift by evaluating the already the existing/assumed benefits each gift option has and picks the gift with the best benefits.
mbti as bugs?
intj: mosquito (I’m sorry)(it’s actually because mosquitoes are secretly scientific masterminds)
intp: spider
entj: praying mantis
entp: cockroach
infj: dragonfly
infp: butterfly
enfj: honeybee
enfp: bumblebee
istj: earthworm
isfj: snail
estj: wasp
esfj: ant
istp: beetle
istp: ladybug
estp: flea or ticks
esfp: fly
Intj and travel
Despite my protest that we just stay in the hotel, despite the seizure inducing lights, despite the loud music and despite the numerous amount of people surrounding me.... I actually enjoyed the night. I need to venture out of my comfort zones sometimes.
Which MBTI type is actually the most likely to be a serial killer?
-Statistic-
Based on an analysis of 150 criminal profiles on personality-database a conclusion can be reached that ISTJ is the most common type among serial killers. Roughly around 15.33% of the serial killers viewed are ISTJs and 23.33% are Si dominants (ISTJ and ISFJ). Interestingly, only 0.6% of killers are ENFJs.
This is a ranking of how common it is for a killer to be each type:
1. ISTJ 15.33%
2. ESTP 13.33%
3. ISTP 12%
4. ISFJ 8%
5. ESTJ 6.67%
6. INTP 6%
7. ISFP 6%
8. INTJ 5.33%
9. ENTJ 5.33%
10. ENTP 4.67%
11. ESFP 4%
12. ESFJ 4%
13. INFP 3.33%
14. INFJ 2.67%
15. ENFP 2.67%
16. ENFJ 0.666666666667%
-Function Breakdown-
Dom Ne - 7.34%
Dom Ni - 9%
Dom Se - 17.33%
Dom Si - 23.33%
Dom Te - 12%
Dom Ti - 18%
Dom Fe - 4.66666666667%
Dom Fi - 9.33%
-Letter Breakdown-
Extroverted: 41.34%
Introverted: 58.66%
Intuitive - 30.6666666667%
Sensing - 69.3333333333%
Thinking - 68.66%
Feeling - 31.34%
Judging - 47.9966666667%
Perceiving - 52.0033333333% (Note: for some reason the first statistic doesn't go fully into 100% so just pretend.) (Image Cred: New York Post)
The Zodiac Killer: A Jungian and Typological Analysis #1
Introduction to The Zodiac Killer
The Zodiac Killer was a Californian serial killer who took the lives of a confirmed five victims and a speculated seven to thirty-seven victims from December 20th, 1968 to October 11th, 1969. To this day he remains unidentified.
Murder (December 20th, 1968 - Lake Herman Road): David Arthur Faraday and Betty Lou Jensen are both shot at 10:15pm.
Murder (July 4th, 1969 - Blue Rock Springs Park Grounds): Darlene Ferrin and Michael Mageau are both shot with a 9mm luger. Mageau survives and later recalls the suspect as a short, heavyset male with short brownish-blonde hair and a round face.
Event (August 1st, 1969): The killer, now operating under the name “The Zodiac”, sends three letters written in code to the Vallejo Times, San Francisco Chronicle and the San Francisco Examiner.
Murder (September 27, 1969 - Lake Berryessa): Bryan Hartnell and Cecelia Shepard are approached by The Zodiac who binds them with fishing line under the false pretense he was a recently escaped prison convict. Bryan Hartnell and Cecelia Shepard are then promptly stabbed a total of sixteen times before the perpetrator vanishes. Hartnell survives and later recalls the suspect as a heavyset man clad in a black, executioner style hood and cross-hair symbol drawn on his torso with greasy brown hair.
Murder (October 11th, 1969 - Geary Street): At 9:35 The Zodiac enters the cab of Paul Stine, directing him to drop him off at Cherry Street. At 9:55pm Paul Stine is shot and killed by Zodiac; at the same time the murder is witnessed by three teenagers. The teenagers and other witnesses later recall the suspect as a 35-45 year old male with reddish-brown crew-cut hair, a medium to heavy-build and who was wearing heavy rim glasses. This description is used as the basis for the police sketch.
Event (October 14th, 1969): Another letter is received by the Zodiac containing a portion of Paul Stine’s shirt and multiple threats.
Aftermath: More letters by The Zodiac were received by newspapers, most prominently the chronicle. Notable highlights of these letters include The Zodiac claiming to have taken the lives of up to 37 victims, a letter that supposedly had his name coded into it, a plan to use a technically plausible bomb, a letter claiming the murder of one Sgt. Radetich, a letter written entirely in cypher stating he believed his victims will work as his slaves in the afterlife, a custom made halloween card meant to be received by reporter Paul Avery and a letter that alluded to the idea he was the kidnapper of Kathleen Johns thus giving credence to the Lawrence Kane hypothesis. The Zodiac Killer has also been the main suspect in multiple other cases, such as Betsy Aardsma case where a college-aged girl was murdered by a stab wound to the torso.
Typological Analysis
Serial killers can usually be organized into six typologies each with their own unique incentive, ideas, thoughts and methods of killing. These types are the organized killer, the disorganized killer, the visionary killer, the mission-oriented killer, the hedonistic killer and the power-oriented killer.
Typology of the Zodiac Killer
The Zodiac Killer is an example of a mixture between two types, mainly a visionary and hedonistic (thrill variety) killer. The visionary killer is driven not usually by thrill or enjoyment but rather by a break from reality. In some cases, this type of killer shows the unique trait of remorse. On the other hand, the hedonistic thrill killer is driven by the thrill of murder, this type is similar to the power-oriented killer as they both commit murder out of enjoyment, however, the hedonistic killer does not derive gratification from dominating the victim.
An example of his visionary side was displayed in one of his many letters sent to the San Francisco Chronicle where he gloated that he wasn’t afraid of the gas chamber as his murders have already secured him enough slaves for paradise. From this we can assume his dominant incentive for killing was the belief that he needs a certain amount of servants for the afterlife. However, his hedonistic thrill seeker side is usually what is focused on when psychologists or people interested in the case first point out when discussing his psychology. For example, in The Vallejo Times letter he stated that killing was the most thrilling experience and was, “better than getting your rocks off with a girl”, though reasserted his belief in paradise afterward. An interesting thing to note is the Zodiac’s connection between sex and murder.
The organized vs. disorganized concept is another system of criminal typology that uses crime scene analysis. Using this system we can use conjecture to determine certain personality traits (organized killers might have a higher IQ, for example). I’ll use this rating system to figure out his orientation on the O/U scale:
-Restraints: 1
-Victim known: 0
-Stranger targeted: 1
-Poisoned: 0
-Chaotic scene: 1
-Controlled scene: 0
-Weapon planned: 1
-Weapon left: 0
-Body transported: 0
-Act focused: 0
From this ranking we can determine that the Zodiac Killer was directly in between a disorganized and organized killer. However, he matches 5/11 descriptor of a disorganized killer (minimal conversation, sloppy crime scene, minimal use of restraints, body left at crime scene, body left in open) and only 4/11 descriptors of the organized variety (planned offense, victim a stranger, aggressive acts prior to death, absent weapon).
For personality factors we can use the OCEAN model:
-Openness: High. Inquisitive and creative. Created his own suit, strapped a flashlight to his gun and sent coded letters.
-Consciousness: Low. Disorganized and spontaneous. Left victims alive, allowed his face to be seen multiple times and didn’t hide victims.
-Extraversion: Unknown. Likely low. Introversion is associated with disorganized killers.
-Agreeableness: Low. Uncooperative and hostile. Crime behavior and taunted police.
-Neuroticism: Mid to low. Moderately emotional and anxious. Was possibly anxious during the course of the Mageau attack, however was perceived as calm and monotone in other murders.
Speculation, Comparisons to Other Killers, Psychological Profiles
We know that the Zodiac Killer could be profiled into both the visionary and hedonistic category based off motivation. However, what could possibly be the cause for these behaviors and what could be gleamed from these classifications? A good method for this type of speculation is by comparing him to other serial killers with similarities in already established psychology. So here are some related speculations.
-It’s possible that the Zodiac Killer gleamed sexual gratification from murder. Yang Xinhai, another hedonistic killer, stated he felt sexual satisfaction after killing his victims. It’s possible his specific type of victim (teenage couples) gave him the most satisfaction.
-When considering the fact he didn’t assault the victims afterward, his teasing of the police and creation of different methods of murder it could be assumed the Zodiac Killer enjoyed not killing on its own but rather the game of murder. He could’ve been hedonistic in the sense he gleamed pleasure from committing a murder, perfecting it and then getting away with it while receiving ludicrous amounts of media attention.
-It’s possible the Zodiac Killer has some form of schizophrenia, psychosis or a Cluster A personality disorder. David “Son of Hope” Berkowitz was strikingly similar to the Zodiac. Berkowitz and the Zodiac both killed couples, both killed their victims while they were in their cars, both sent letters taunting the police, both used guns to murder their victims, both didn’t assault their victims after and both had aspects of the visionary type. Berkowitz was diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. Berkowitz also gained sexual gratification from the murders, supporting the previous comparison.
-The Zodiac Killer likely took great pride in his public appearance. In his letter about the attack of Michael Mageau he said that he calmly left the scene as to not attract attention to himself, despite Mageau asserting he had left quickly in a panic. At the Lake Berryessa attack the Zodiac wore a specialized suit complete with a symbol on the torso. Sure this is strange on its own but the stranger part is that there’d be no need to wear the suit if he was planning on killing both victims, which indicates that he wore it because he wanted to tailor his image to his persona. The Zodiac even admitted this himself when he complained that he didn’t believe he got as much media attention as he deserved. All of this culminates with the Zodiac’s statement saying he didn’t look like the police sketch made of him, which could be his attempt to draw the public’s attention away from who he is under the façade of the notorious, mysterious and inventive Zodiac Killer.
-Another comparison could be made to Dennis “BTK’ Radar. Radar and the Zodiac both sent letters and penned their own name. Radar was diagnosed with narcissistic personality disorder, this could very well coincide with the Zodiac’s need for admiration and recognition.
-If he does fall in line with the “disorganized killer” typology it’s possible he did not travel far from his home to commit the crime, was secluded or asocial and generally worked in a field that didn’t require much talent.
-The female victims of the Zodiac Killer may look like a past girlfriend such as Ted Bundy or any woman associated with pain. 2/3 of his female victims were twenty-two years of age and Betty Lou Jensen and Darlene Ferrin have strikingly similar facial proportions (specifically the spacing between the nose, mouth and eyes and the size of those areas). This could also link to sexual satisfaction being taken from murder.
-He was more focused on killing women over men, evident from him failing to kill the male side of the couple in two murders. Possibly this the result of a damaged ego after rejection as if he’s trying to regain power over women. This could be a result of his introversion linked to unorganized killers. This could also possibly disprove the hedonistic killer theory in favor of the power-oriented killer theory.
From this we can assume three possible motivations:
-Paranoid or odd beliefs
-Sexual gratification
-Misogyny
Jungian Analysis
Carl Jung (born July 26th, 1871 - died June 6th, 1961) was an early Swiss psychoanalyst and apprentice of Freud. Many of the concepts he built upon and created are still in use today including the concepts of introversion/extraversion, archetypes, the subconscious, the unconscious and persona.
Use of Intuition
Intuition, explained simply, is the unconscious process which allows the user to see into or perceive conditions that are not obvious through logical thought. It presents its conclusions as whole or complete in the mind of the user. It's the ability for one to perceive and expect possible motions without logical deliberation. For example, one may get a bad feeling about an apple because it subconsciously reminds them of an apple pie they hated.
The Zodiac Killer represents the perfect picture of an extroverted intuitive killer. Instead of receding from the object to transpose his internalized view of abstracted images from the subconscious onto the environment around him, the Zodiac Killer’s intuition is in good relation to the object. He’s not oriented toward transposing his view of the abstracted image onto the object but rather interested in the object's pre-existing string of possibilities and abstracted images as if he was searching for chaos.
We could also see use of intuition in the very concept of The Zodiac Killer. The perpetrator of these crimes comprises his self of the multiple abstracted characteristics of what the symbol of the Zodiac Killer is. He tries to inhabit a single symbol of multiple characteristics including strength, mysteriousness, intelligence, creativity, etc. Though he may or may not inhabit any of these characteristics.
Archetypes
On the topic of personas or symbols of self, in this paragraph we’ll discuss his use of The Joker symbol. Throughout his violent escapades he takes on the form of someone rather unaffected by conventional morals, beliefs or attention to organization. He rather takes on the persona of someone humorous, who likes playing games and is free form all conventional forms of organization. It seems as if the main archetype he tries to inhabit is the Joker, even if subconsciously.
Outro
The last Zodiac Letter was received in 1974, the last murder was in 1969 and all likely suspects are now dead. Even after all that time the remaining notoriety of this case is staggering, and new suspects are still coming up today. Even more staggering yet, after all that the case is still likely to never be solved.
Sources:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/307819660_The_Traits_and_the_Thrill_of_Serial_Killers
https://www.zodiacciphers.com/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zodiac_Killer
https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/son-of-sam-arrested
https://www.infjs.com/articles/jung-descriptions-of-each-dichotomy-i-e-n-s-f-t-j-p.37/
https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna8929452#:~:text=Serial%20killer%20personality,more%20severe%20psychopathic%20personality%20disorder.
https://www.britannica.com/biography/Carl-Jung
https://www.marshall.edu/forensics/files/Baber_Seminar2014_ODcsp.pdf
https://zodiackillerfacts.com/ https://www.zodiackiller.com/AllenFile.html
(Notice: I am not a psychologist, but just interested in criminology and versed in Jungian theory)
I took an MBTI test and i found out im a INTP-T and during my whole life i thought i was a crackhead
mbti as scents
intj: jasmine
entj: chocolate
intp: sandalwood
entp: cinnamon
infj: spearmint
enfj: rose
infp: lavender
enfp: eucalyptus
istj: sea spray
estj: coffee
isfj: vanilla
esfj: fresh linen
istp: pine
estp: pumpkin spice
isfp: baby powder
esfp: lemon
MBTI Studying Tips - Part 1
DISCLAIMERS:
What I did do: Collect information and organize them into an easy-to-read-and-understand-post. What I didn’t do: Write most of it. Most of the information here isn’t my own writing, but rather useful tips I found from various sources. Credit is given at the bottom of the post.
I wrote most of this by doing a hell lot of research online and trying to ask my friends of different types irl what they thought of it. I am no professional, and my words in no way should be taken as gospel. Please, please send me corrections or your thoughts if anything I wrote was inaccurate, I will appreciate all the feedback I can get.
Hello hello! Your old friend Skye is here with some tips for studying based on your MBTI personality type. Now before we jump straight into things, let’s answer a few basic questions:
What is MBTI?
MBTI stands for the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, which is basically a personality test that classifies you into one of 16 different personality categories based on a four-letter code. This is what the “INFP” or “ESFJ” codes mean if you’ve been seeing them around in the community. The test assesses you on four of your main traits:
How do you prefer to direct your energy? (I vs E)
What kind of information do you prefer to gather? (S vs N)
What criteria do you prefer for making decisions? (T vs F)
What kind of environment do you prefer? (J vs P)
So how do I find out what’s my type?
You can take a free online quiz here!
Okay, but what’s with the ‘Introverted Thinking’ and ‘Fi’ and all the fancy terms?
You can read more about Cognitive Function Theory here! I will be basing my post off this theory because I think it’s a more comprehensive method of understanding MBTI.
Onwards! (The rest is under the cut bc skye rambled and it’s long af even tho I’m just covering the introverted functions)
Keep reading
Things about you that contrast every stereotype of your MBTI type
(and in general are extremely unlike your type)
Vs
Most stereotypical traits of your's
I'll start:
ESTP (7w6)
Unstereotypical:
I wrote fanfiction, had a phase in which i doodled everyday. Have had one relationship so far, don't drink alcohol and the last time i was at a party was more than a year ago. I also hate team sports with a passion. I love learning new languages and am a total TV show nerd.I also binge watch. Also I have never been in a physical fight. Lmao . Btw i also love to have philosophical conversations with special people and am generally attuned with analyzing my dreams and the meaning behind them. I usually take a lot of time to make friends (real friends).
VS
Stereotypical:
I love the gym , calisthenics etc. I love cars and traveling, and exploring new places with a passion. I generally prefer being outdoors to indoors. I like camping and sometimes am a adrenaline junkie.
Laughing at myself as I go through some old emails from grad school. If you ever wanted an email version of an INFJ door slam, it looks like sequentially replying to a social group email chain with:
"Thank you for the invitation! I’m so sorry I can't make happy hour."
One week later...
"Unfortunately, I can't make the birthday party."
Two weeks later…
“I’m unable to join that day.”
One month later...
"I won't be there."
Four months later...
"I'm moving to South Africa."
"I don't think pancakes will solve this."
-ENTP gently coaxing INFJ out of a downward spiral with some practical advice
Tell me you've seen an INFJ get angry without telling me
(via true that)
(via Pin page)
Been giving this look to a lot of people these days
Poll: INFJs, what's your ideal day?
Imagine you have one glorious day all to yourself. No work, no errands, no obligations whatsoever. How would you spend your time?
A) Cottage core coziness
You settle down on a couch in a sunny corner, with your sketchbook, latest needlework, or a good book, along with a pile of blankets, and a pot of tea. However, you may or may not get around to any of it because napping is strongly encouraged. When you wake up, you stroll through the garden and then bake a batch of scones.
B) Rainy academia rabbit hole
You turn on some classical music, pull a chair up to a magnificent mahogany work desk and crank out the newest plot twist in your murder mystery manuscript. For inspiration, you go for a walk in the rain, grab a coffee from your favorite cafe, and end up strolling the halls of a local museum.
C) Wanderlust wayfarer
You hop on the local public transportation and get off at a stop you've never been to before. You stroll through charming streets, go antique shopping, and browse bookshops and thrift stores. For a break, you grab a table at a local restaurant, order an indulgent meal, and journal about your excursions that day.
D) Brew-hopping bookworm
You grab your favorite travel bag, pile it full of books, a journal, and/or a sketchbook, and make your way over to your favorite coffee shop or bar. You snag a small table in a cozy corner and, over the course of several luxurious hours, imbibe in your favorite drink, and get lost in reading, writing, or sketching for hours. At the end of it all, you purchase a growler of your favorite brew, or bag of your favorite roast, and head home.
E) Fresh air friend
Fresh air is calling, and you must answer. You lace up your favorite pair of walking/running/biking shoes and hit the trail. The weather is perfect. A crisp breeze greets your face. As you breathe it in, the endorphins start flowing. You're making great time, but that's not the point. It's going to be a great day.
F) Gamer of Thrones
A whole day to yourself? You breathe a sigh of relief as you settle into an ergonomic chair in front of a desk equipped with enough monitors to create a screen the size of the Pacific Ocean. You feel the security of your noise-cancelling headphones suction to your ears like a life vest, and dive into the comforting world of your favorite game. With a minifridge within arms reach and plenty of snacks at your fingertips, life gets very, very good, for the next several hours. (Time? What is time? Also, what is “outside”?)
(via Pin page)
ENTP WHEN HE’S BEING INTROSPECTIVE
